القائمة
Use when an experiment phase is complete, before drawing conclusions, before writing results, or before claiming findings are publication-ready
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Use during or after manuscript writing to verify every quantitative claim traces to actual data, every figure is script-generated, and all results including negative ones are reported
Use when starting any conversation involving research, hypotheses, experiments, data analysis, scientific claims, or manuscript writing — establishes how to find and use Eureka research skills
Use when a research design has been approved and needs to be broken into executable experiment steps — the research equivalent of an implementation plan
Use when creating, updating, or reviewing a research figure (plot, chart, brain map, heatmap, schematic) — guides chart-type selection, typography, colorblind-safe palette, layout, and journal-specific export specs. Dispatches a figure-reviewer subagent after rendering. Complements claims-audit (which checks figure integrity) by checking figure design.
Use when running any experiment or analysis — hypothesis and analysis plan must be registered before seeing results, the scientific equivalent of test-driven development
Use when writing a research manuscript — guides section-by-section writing with prerequisite gates, citation discipline, number traceability, and per-section subagent review. Activated after experiment results are reviewed and before claims-audit.
| name | requesting-research-review |
| description | Use when an experiment phase is complete, before drawing conclusions, before writing results, or before claiming findings are publication-ready |
Dispatch eureka:research-reviewer subagent to catch scientific issues before they propagate. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the evidence, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work.
Core principle: Review before you conclude.
Mandatory:
Optional but valuable:
1. Identify what you're reviewing:
Determine which research phase just completed and what the reviewer needs to evaluate.
2. Gather the review context:
RESEARCH_QUESTION = The exact hypothesis being tested
DESIGN_DOC_PATH = Path to the approved research design document
RESULTS_PATHS = Paths to ALL result files (not just summaries)
PHASE_DESCRIPTION = Which phase just completed (e.g., "baseline experiments")
DOMAIN_CONTEXT = Field-specific context, tools, typical effect sizes
TARGET_VENUE = Target journal or conference (sets the bar)
PASS_THRESHOLD = Score threshold (85 for mid-project, 95 for pre-submission)
3. Dispatch the research-reviewer subagent:
Use the Agent tool with eureka:research-reviewer type. Fill the template at requesting-research-review/research-reviewer-prompt.md with the gathered context.
4. Act on feedback:
| Situation | Threshold | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Mid-project checkpoint | 85/100 | Catch major issues early without demanding final polish |
| Before writing results | 90/100 | Claims must be well-supported before committing to paper |
| Pre-submission gate | 95/100 | Publication-ready: all claims verified, all stats complete |
| Quick sanity check | 80/100 | Just checking for obvious problems |
[Just completed baseline experiments comparing three models on a held-out test set]
You: Let me request a research review before interpreting these results.
RESEARCH_QUESTION = "Does Model C outperform Model A and Model B baselines
on outcome Y prediction?"
DESIGN_DOC_PATH = docs/eureka/designs/2026-04-10-model-baselines-design.md
RESULTS_PATHS = results/run_20260411_171136/cv_results.json,
results/baseline_modelA/, results/baseline_modelB/
PHASE_DESCRIPTION = Baseline experiment completion (Model A, Model B, Model C)
DOMAIN_CONTEXT = Supervised prediction on cohort data,
Pearson r and R-squared are standard metrics
TARGET_VENUE = [target journal]
PASS_THRESHOLD = 85
[Dispatch eureka:research-reviewer subagent]
[Subagent returns]:
D1: 88 D2: 82 D3: 75 D4: 70 D5: 72 D6: 78 D7: 80
Overall: FAIL (D3, D4 below threshold)
Critical: Single seed results reported — need ≥5 seeds
Major: No confidence intervals on Pearson r comparisons
You: [Fix: re-run with 10 seeds, add bootstrap CIs]
[Request re-review after fixes]
eureka:using-eureka (when experiment phase completion detected)eureka:research-reviewer agent (via Agent tool)eureka:receiving-research-review (for handling the feedback)Never:
If reviewer is wrong:
See template at: requesting-research-review/research-reviewer-prompt.md