Faithfully replicate a single raster icon/graphic image as a hand-authored SVG — reproducing the actual drawing, NOT swapping in a similar stock glyph. Use this whenever the user wants to "vectorize", "redraw as SVG", "replicate this icon as svg", "hand-write an svg of this", "make an editable/scalable version of this icon", or turn a cropped PNG/JPG of a logo, icon, or small graphic into clean vector code. Prefer this over grabbing a Font Awesome/Tabler/Material icon whenever fidelity to the original matters. Also used as the per-icon worker for the figure-to-svg skill.
Faithfully replicate a single raster icon/graphic image as a hand-authored SVG — reproducing the actual drawing, NOT swapping in a similar stock glyph. Use this whenever the user wants to "vectorize", "redraw as SVG", "replicate this icon as svg", "hand-write an svg of this", "make an editable/scalable version of this icon", or turn a cropped PNG/JPG of a logo, icon, or small graphic into clean vector code. Prefer this over grabbing a Font Awesome/Tabler/Material icon whenever fidelity to the original matters. Also used as the per-icon worker for the figure-to-svg skill.
icon-to-svg
Turn one raster image of an icon or small graphic into an SVG that looks like that specific
image. The goal is replication, not "find a close-enough icon." A stock glyph is a different
drawing; here we reproduce the shapes, colors, and proportions actually present in the crop.
Hard-won rules (baked in — no need to read anything first)
Organic/interlocking glyphs (handshakes, clasped hands, faces, gestures) have a LOW ceiling
for primitive hand-authoring. If the user rejects your drawing on look twice, STOP re-drawing
and switch methods — a recolored open-license stock glyph (Font Awesome / Tabler / Material,
note the license), or keep the crop as raster — or ask which they prefer. Repeated identical
feedback means the method is wrong, not the parameters.
White-on-dark icons: judge by eye, not by score_icon — the scorer assumes dark-on-light
and lies on inverted polarity.
Learn something new the hard way? File it with /figure-to-svg lesson "<...>" at session end, and
merge the rule into the step of the skill where it applies — that's how these two got here.
Why hand-author instead of auto-trace
Auto-tracers (potrace/vtracer) reproduce every pixel including blur and background artifacts, and
emit messy paths. A human-authored SVG built from primitives (ellipse, rect, , ,
) is clean, tiny, editable, and recolorable — and for the flat/line/solid icons common in
figures it can match the original very closely. So we read the image, decompose it into a handful
of shapes, and write those shapes directly.
circle
line
path
Setup (one-time)
The verification script needs a Python env with cairosvg, Pillow, numpy:
Use that interpreter to run scripts/render_compare.py. (Reuse it across runs; don't reinstall.)
Workflow
1. Look, then decompose
Open the image and study it. Enlarge it if small (nearest-neighbor) so edges are visible. Write
down, explicitly:
Component shapes, back to front (e.g. "grey rim ellipse → white top ellipse → navy button
circle → light highlight → dark dash on the right").
Exact colors — don't guess. Sample hex values from the pixels (open in Python and read a few
representative pixels, or use the palette the parent figure already defined). Muddy guesses are
the #1 cause of a bad replica.
Style: flat solid fills, outline/stroke line-art, or pseudo-3D with shading. Match it — an
outline original should become fill="none" stroke="...", a solid original should become filled
shapes.
Proportions: the crop's width:height ratio sets the viewBox.
2. Write the SVG
Author it directly with primitives:
Make it make sense. The aim is a good, coherent drawing of the object — the version a
competent illustrator would produce — not a shape that merely overlaps the crop. Every element
should correspond to a real part of the thing: a smartwatch has a hollow outlined face + a strap +
a heart; a folder has a tab + a pocket + an actual "+"; a test tube has a body + a cap + liquid. If
you can't say what a shape represents, it probably shouldn't be there, and if a required part is
missing the icon is wrong even if it "reads" colorful. A viewer should recognize the object at a
glance. This — not the score — is the bar.
Self-contained & centered. Draw the icon centered in its viewBox, and size the viewBox
tight to the icon's own content with small, roughly EQUAL margins on all sides. Do not copy
the crop's framing: crops are often off-center or padded on one side, and reproducing that (drawing
the glyph shoved into a corner of an oversized viewBox) is a bug. The crop tells you the shape and
colors; the icon's placement in the larger figure is handled elsewhere (the composer's bbox). A
good icon fills most of its viewBox and is visually centered.
Set the viewBox to the icon's aspect ratio (e.g. a ~74×42 icon → viewBox="0 0 200 120"); pick
round numbers so coordinates are easy to reason about.
Draw back to front so later shapes sit on top (rim before top face, body before details).
Reuse the sampled palette exactly. For multi-tone icons (e.g. a two-color brain), keep each color
as its own shape/group.
Keep it minimal — a good icon is usually 4–15 elements. Resist adding noise the eye won't miss.
Comment each shape (<!-- sensor button -->) so it stays editable.
Prefer geometric primitives where they fit; fall back to <path> only for genuinely irregular
outlines (organic curves, silhouettes). For a <path>, sketch with a few cubic Béziers rather than
hundreds of trace points.
Then view /tmp/cmp.png — it's the source and your render side by side at matched size. Check:
silhouette/aspect, color accuracy, placement of internal details, solid-vs-outline, overall "reads
as the same thing."
Then get a numeric self-score (the icon's inner evaluation) so you don't ship on a hunch:
It trims both to content (robust to crop edge-bleed), then prints sim / shape / color / center_off
and a PASS/REVISE verdict (exit 0 = pass), so you can loop until it passes: REVISE with a
low shape means the silhouette/details are off, low color means a fill is wrong, high center_off
means re-center.
But PASS is not proof. The score is coverage + colour, so a shapeless mass of the right colour can
still pass — a watch that came out as a teal blob, or a "+" that collapsed into a notch, may read
PASS. So the visual compare in /tmp/cmp.png is the real gate: look at it and ask "does my render
read as the SAME OBJECT — right parts, right structure?" If not, fix it no matter what the number
says. The number tells you when you might be done; your eyes decide if you actually are.
4. Refine, then save
Iterate on the shapes until the comparison looks right (usually 1–3 passes). Save the final .svg
to the requested path (or <name>.svg next to the source). Report what you changed and any
intentional simplifications.
5. Normalize centering (self-contained check)
Even a well-drawn icon can end up off-center if you inherited the crop's framing. Re-frame the
viewBox tight to the drawn content with equal margins:
It renders the SVG, finds the true content bounding box, and rewrites only the viewBox/size (shapes
untouched) so the icon is centered and self-contained. It prints the center-offset before/after;
aim for a near-zero offset. Do this as the last step so the saved asset drops cleanly into any layout.
Fidelity bar
"As close as possible" means a viewer glancing at both sees the same object with the same colors and
layout — not a pixel-perfect trace. If an element genuinely can't be reduced to clean primitives
(fine photographic texture, tiny rendered text like "120/80"), say so and either approximate it or
recommend keeping the raster crop for that one. Honesty about a weak match beats a confident wrong
one.
Example decomposition
Input: a small oval biosensor crop — white puck, navy button left-of-center with a light
highlight, a short dark dash on the right, subtle 3-D rim.
Output shapes (back→front): grey rim ellipse; white top ellipse with thin grey stroke; navy
button ellipse; light-blue highlight ellipse (rotated); rounded dark rect for the dash. ~6
elements, matches the crop.
