القائمة
Classify review feedback and choose proportionate guardrails without inflating default context cost.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Fine-grained outside-in RED-GREEN-REFACTOR microcycles with specialist agents and single-diagnostic implementation.
RGR sequence, observed-failure evidence, drill-down unit tests, and non-behavioral exemptions for Phoenix/Commanded work.
Phoenix 1.8, Postgres, Commanded, Ecto, ExUnit, Dialyzer, and strict static-check conventions.
Phoenix auth/session/CSRF, command authorization, event data sensitivity, Postgres, dependency, secret, and threat-model review triggers.
Process Forgejo PR feedback with reflection, guardrail-gap classification, and inline thread replies.
Write implementation plans as test-addressed red-green-refactor cycles rather than component waterfalls.
| name | review-taxonomy |
| description | Classify review feedback and choose proportionate guardrails without inflating default context cost. |
Use this skill when processing PR feedback or deciding whether to add a new rule, skill, command, or plugin behavior.
guardrail-gap means the failure is systemic and the added control is worth its ongoing context and maintenance cost. one-off means fix the immediate issue without adding always-loaded guidance.
Knowing bypass of an existing guardrail is prima facie guardrail-gap because the existing control failed.
Prefer the smallest durable control: plugin enforcement for hard safety rules, a short always-loaded rule for frequent guardrails, a skill for longer procedures, a slash command for repeatable workflows, and no new guardrail for isolated mistakes.
