القائمة
Work a GitHub issue end to end in Alt — read the issue, locate the affected code, drive the fix test-first, and commit it. Use when the user points at an issue by number or URL and wants it fixed, or says "fix issue 42" / "この issue 直して".
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Drive Alt changes test-first in outside-in order — E2E (Playwright/Hurl) → CDC (Pact) → Unit (RED-GREEN-REFACTOR) — and close with a local CI parity sweep (format/lint/type/security) for every touched microservice. Use when implementing a feature, fixing a bug, or refactoring, when deciding what test to write first, or when the user says "TDDで". Also use before declaring work complete, since "tests pass" is not "CI will pass".
Alt の Architecture Decision Record を日本語で `docs/ADR/NNNNNN.md` に書き起こす。番号採番、frontmatter（title/date/status/tags/affected_services/aliases/supersedes）、Context・Decision・Consequences の書き分け、wikilink 形式、OSS 公開向けの情報衛生を扱う。実装が一段落して決定を記録するときに使う。ユーザが「ADR書いて」「ADRにまとめて」「ADRに記録して」「実装が終わったのでドキュメントに」と言ったとき、または設計上の判断を伴う変更を終えたときに使う。
Interrogate a plan against the project's documented decisions and domain language — challenging fuzzy terms, cross-referencing the code, and surfacing where the plan contradicts an existing ADR or canonical contract. Use when the user wants a plan stress-tested against what the project has already decided, rather than in the abstract. Prefer plain grill-me when there is no documented model to test against, and plan-context-loader when the goal is to gather vault context rather than be questioned.
Hunt for deepening opportunities — shallow modules whose interface costs as much to learn as their implementation saves — and present them as a visual before/after report, informed by the decisions already recorded in docs/ADR/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, reduce the cost of understanding a subsystem, or make code more testable. Use clean-architecture instead when the question is whether a specific change violates Alt's layer rules.
設計・計画タスク時に、Obsidian vault から関連 ADR・contract・review・runbook を 必要最小限だけ集めて計画の精度を上げる。 次のときに使う: - 「計画を立てて」「設計して」「プランを作って」 - ADR や過去の決定を確認したい - Knowledge Trail / Knowledge Home や reproject-safe / immutable 設計が絡む
Alt の Go 規約を適用する。エラーラップ、context 第一引数、slog、テーブル駆動テスト、http.Server の 4 タイムアウト、Redis Streams の XACK/XAUTOCLAIM 対、fail-fast 設定を扱う。Go のコードを書く・直す・レビューするときに使う。ユーザが「Go」や規約名に触れなくても、Go サービス（alt-backend, auth-hub, pre-processor, search-indexer, mq-hub, rag-orchestrator, altctl）の実装・修正に入るなら使う。
| name | fix-issue |
| description | Work a GitHub issue end to end in Alt — read the issue, locate the affected code, drive the fix test-first, and commit it. Use when the user points at an issue by number or URL and wants it fixed, or says "fix issue 42" / "この issue 直して". |
| allowed-tools | Bash, Read, Grep, Glob, Edit, Write |
| argument-hint | <issue-number> |
Target issue: $ARGUMENTS
gh issue view $ARGUMENTS. Restate in one line what behavior is wrong and what
correct behavior would look like — the reproduction steps in the issue are the specification.tdd-workflow skill: a failing test that reproduces the reported
behavior comes before the fix, so there is evidence the defect existed and is gone.tdd-workflow Phase 5) before declaring it done.git commit -m "fix(<service>): <what changed>
Fixes #$ARGUMENTS"
Co-Authored-By trailer — Alt's history does not carry them.git push and gh pr create are not part of this workflow. They happen only on the user's explicit
instruction, run by the user.