| name | pr-review |
| description | Pull request review workflow — orchestrates multi-agent review with confidence scoring, parallel analysis, and PR comment formatting. |
| user-invocable | false |
PR Review Workflow
Overview
Multi-perspective PR review using parallel specialized agents with confidence-based filtering.
Review Pipeline
- Gather context — PR diff, CLAUDE.md guidelines, related files
- Launch parallel reviews:
- Convention compliance (vs CLAUDE.md and coding standards)
- Bug detection (focused on changes only, not pre-existing issues)
- Historical context (git blame, related changes)
- Test coverage assessment (are changes tested?)
- Score findings — Each finding gets a confidence score 0-100
- Filter — Only findings ≥80 confidence are reported (configurable)
- Format — Output as terminal summary or PR comment
Finding Format
### {severity}: {title}
**Confidence:** {score}/100
**File:** {path}#L{start}-L{end}
**Category:** Bug | Convention | Security | Coverage | Performance
{description}
**Suggestion:**
{specific fix or recommendation}
Severity Levels
- BLOCKER (confidence ≥90): Breaks functionality, security vulnerability
- MAJOR (confidence ≥80): Significant quality issue, missing coverage
- MINOR (confidence ≥70): Style, naming, minor improvement
- NIT (confidence ≥60): Optional, author's discretion
Auto-Skip Conditions
Don't review if:
- PR is closed or draft
- PR is trivial/automated (dependabot, version bumps)
- PR already has a review from this session
- All changes are documentation-only (use doc-updater instead)
Comment Modes
--terminal (default): Output to terminal for local review--comment: Post as PR comment via gh CLI--inline: Post inline comments on specific code lines
