| name | dispatching-parallel-agents |
| description | Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies |
| trigger | when_needed |
| language | zh-TW |
| adapted_from | openskills/dispatching-parallel-agents |
| version | 1.0.0-antigravity |
| original_license | Unknown |
DISPATCHING-PARALLEL-AGENTS 處理指南
技能版本: v1.0 (Antigravity 適配版)
原始來源: openskills/dispatching-parallel-agents
語言: 繁體中文
概述
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies
Dispatching Parallel Agents
使用情境
此技能適用於以下情況:
- 用戶明確要求相關功能時
- 任務需要專業領域知識時
- 需要遵循特定工作流程時
概述
When you have multiple unrelated failures (different test files, different subsystems, different bugs), investigating them sequentially wastes time. Each investigation is independent and can happen in parallel.
Core principle: Dispatch one agent per independent problem domain. Let them work concurrently.
When to Use
詳細內容請參閱:example_4.txt
Use when:
- 3+ test files failing with different root causes
- Multiple subsystems broken independently
- Each problem can be understood without context from others
- No shared state between investigations
Don't use when:
- Failures are related (fix one might fix others)
- Need to understand full system state
- Agents would interfere with each other
The Pattern
1. Identify Independent Domains
Group failures by what's broken:
- File A tests: Tool approval flow
- File B tests: Batch completion behavior
- File C tests: Abort functionality
Each domain is independent - fixing tool approval doesn't affect abort tests.
2. Create Focused Agent Tasks
Each agent gets:
- Specific scope: One test file or subsystem
- Clear goal: Make these tests pass
- Constraints: Don't change other code
- Expected output: Summary of what you found and fixed
3. Dispatch in Parallel
Task("Fix agent-tool-abort.test.ts failures")
Task("Fix batch-completion-behavior.test.ts failures")
Task("Fix tool-approval-race-conditions.test.ts failures")
詳細內容請參閱:[example_5.txt](examples/example_5.txt)
## Common Mistakes
**❌ Too broad:** "Fix all the tests" - agent gets lost
**✅ Specific:** "Fix agent-tool-abort.test.ts" - focused scope
**❌ No context:** "Fix the race condition" - agent doesn't know where
**✅ Context:** Paste the error messages and test names
**❌ No constraints:** Agent might refactor everything
**✅ Constraints:** "Do NOT change production code" or "Fix tests only"
**❌ Vague output:** "Fix it" - you don't know what changed
**✅ Specific:** "Return summary of root cause and changes"
## When NOT to Use
**Related failures:** Fixing one might fix others - investigate together first
**Need full context:** Understanding requires seeing entire system
**Exploratory debugging:** You don't know what's broken yet
**Shared state:** Agents would interfere (editing same files, using same resources)
## Real Example from Session
**Scenario:** 6 test failures across 3 files after major refactoring
**Failures:**
- agent-tool-abort.test.ts: 3 failures (timing issues)
- batch-completion-behavior.test.ts: 2 failures (tools not executing)
- tool-approval-race-conditions.test.ts: 1 failure (execution count = 0)
**Decision:** Independent domains - abort logic separate from batch completion separate from race conditions
**Dispatch:**
Agent 1 → Fix agent-tool-abort.test.ts
Agent 2 → Fix batch-completion-behavior.test.ts
Agent 3 → Fix tool-approval-race-conditions.test.ts
**Results:**
- Agent 1: Replaced timeouts with event-based waiting
- Agent 2: Fixed event structure bug (threadId in wrong place)
- Agent 3: Added wait for async tool execution to complete
**Integration:** All fixes independent, no conflicts, full suite green
**Time saved:** 3 problems solved in parallel vs sequentially
## Key Benefits
1. **Parallelization** - Multiple investigations happen simultaneously
2. **Focus** - Each agent has narrow scope, less context to track
3. **Independence** - Agents don't interfere with each other
4. **Speed** - 3 problems solved in time of 1
## Verification
After agents return:
1. **Review each summary** - Understand what changed
2. **Check for conflicts** - Did agents edit same code?
3. **Run full suite** - Verify all fixes work together
4. **Spot check** - Agents can make systematic errors
## Real-World Impact
From debugging session (2025-10-03):
- 6 failures across 3 files
- 3 agents dispatched in parallel
- All investigations completed concurrently
- All fixes integrated successfully
- Zero conflicts between agent changes
---
## 專案整合
此技能已適配 Antigravity 系統:
- 遵循 `skills/_base/coding_style.md` 編碼規範
- 與 `skills/_base/architecture.md` 架構模式一致
- 符合 Constitution v3.1 語言規範 (繁體中文)
### 相關技能
可搭配以下技能使用:
- `systematic-debugging` - 系統化除錯
- `verification-before-completion` - 完成前驗證