القائمة
用清晰的价值、成本、风险和依赖关系对需求项做优先级排序与版本编排
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Use when the user asks for a deep code review, adversarial review, multi-agent review, risk-ranked review, PR review, security-sensitive review, or implementation verification with concrete file and line evidence.
Use when the user asks to debug a failing test, runtime error, regression, flaky behavior, production-like failure, root-cause analysis, or loop-until-done repair workflow.
Use when the user asks for source-backed research, official-documentation lookup, technical comparison, dependency evaluation, repository investigation plus synthesis, or fan-out research with ranked conclusions.
Use when the user asks for a dynamic workflow, multi-agent workflow, task-specific harness, complex task orchestration, fan-out synthesis, adversarial verification, generate-and-filter exploration, tournament-style solution search, or loop-until-done execution in Codex.
Wireframe workflow for low-fidelity structure, hierarchy, and information layout exploration.
Animation workflow for motion-heavy artifacts, scene timing, and browser playback review.
| name | roadmap-prioritization |
| description | 用清晰的价值、成本、风险和依赖关系对需求项做优先级排序与版本编排 |
| version | v0.1 |
| template_version | 1.1 |
| owner | xiaoz |
| cn_title | 路线图与优先级排序 |
| en_alias | roadmap-prioritization |
| skill_family | prioritization |
| primary_artifact | prioritization memo |
references/prioritization-patterns-sanitized.md：排序维度与 P0-P4 抽象定义references/version-planning-patterns-sanitized.md：版本编排规则和依赖表达方式references/source-coverage.md：本 skill 可使用的脱敏来源覆盖说明| Category | Typical tool types | Enable when | Avoid when | Expected evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local docs/files | shell / file read / prior PRDs | 有历史 PRD、会议结论、功能池文档 | 没有候选事项时 | 候选项清单来源 |
| Structured docs | markdown / matrices / roadmap tables | 需要输出排序表、版本表、取舍说明 | 仅简单口头判断时 | 评分表与排序结论 |
| Data analysis | spreadsheet / weighted scoring | 有价值、使用频率、成本或风险数据 | 完全无数据时不要伪精确打分 | 评分口径与加权说明 |
| Web research | market scan / official product pages | 排序依赖最新竞品或政策窗口 | 纯内部版本排期 | 外部影响来源 |
| No-browse reasoning | direct synthesis only | 只基于内部需求池做版本编排 | 需要外部趋势判断时 | 内部排序依据 |
这里有 12 个 AI 助手相关需求，请帮我做 2 个版本的优先级建议。目标是首发必须可用、第二版提升留存。请给出 P0-P4 分类、排序依据、依赖关系、为什么有些需求不该进首发。