| name | meeting-prep |
| description | Prepare meeting briefs with SPICED discovery (WbD) and MEDDICC qualification (Andy Whyte) — account research, attendee profiles, question banks, scorecard gaps, and competitive context. Use before discovery calls, demos, executive meetings, or deal reviews. Triggers on: "meeting prep", "call prep", "discovery prep", "MEDDICC", "MEDDIC", "qualify this deal", "pre-call research", "discovery questions", "champion test", "economic buyer". |
| license | MIT |
| compatibility | Claude Code, Jesse, Codex, Hermes, Windsurf, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, Copilot, Zed, VS Code, Goose |
| metadata | {"version":"1.1.0","author":"LeadMagic","category":"sales-revops","tags":["meeting-prep","discovery","call-prep","spiced","meddicc","qualification"],"related_skills":["pipeline-management","competitive-intel","objection-handling","demo-scripts","multi-thread-orchestration","roi-calculator"],"frameworks":["Winning by Design — SPICED","Keenan — Gap Selling","Andy Whyte — MEDDICC Qualification","Force Management — MEDDICC Methodology","Huthwaite — SPIN Selling","Gartner — Challenger Sale"]} |
Meeting Prep
Overview
Win rates are decided before the call. This skill produces a one-page brief:
account snapshot, attendee profiles, tailored question banks, and — for active
deals — a MEDDICC gap analysis showing which dimensions still need evidence.
SPICED (Winning by Design) structures early discovery conversations.
Gap Selling (Keenan) deepens problem diagnosis — current state, future state, quantified gap, root cause, happy-ears guardrails.
MEDDICC (Andy Whyte) scores deal qualification with evidence. They do not
contradict — SPICED uncovers; MEDDICC scores. Both map to the same CRM fields
defined in pipeline-management.
When to Use
- "Prep me for a call with [company]"
- "Discovery questions for [prospect]"
- "MEDDICC score this deal" or "what's missing on MEDDICC?"
- "Champion test — is this contact a real champion?"
- "Brief me before my demo / exec meeting"
- "Pre-call research for [account]"
For full sales process design, load pipeline-management first.
Authoritative Foundations
- Winning by Design — SPICED. Situation, Pain, Impact, Critical Event,
Decision — progressive discovery in Connect and Discovery stages. Critical
Event is the urgency gate: no CE, no timeline.
- Keenan — Gap Selling. Problem Centric™ discovery: map Current State
(situation, problem, impact, root cause, emotions) → Future State → Gap.
Spend ~25% of cycle on diagnosis; build Problem Identification Chart before
calls. Anti-pattern: happy ears — validate impact, don't assume yes.
Full playbook →
references/keenan-gap-selling.md.
- Andy Whyte — MEDDICC (MEDDICC.com). Seven dimensions scored 0/1/2 with
evidence: Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Criteria, Decision Process,
Identify Pain, Champion, Competition. "Always Be Qualifying" — re-score after
every interaction. Champion must pass four tests before Proposal.
- Force Management — MEDDICC Methodology. Source framework for enterprise
qualification; Whyte's scorecard operationalizes it for deal inspection.
- Huthwaite — SPIN. Question flow for conversational discovery — complements
SPICED, does not replace it.
- Challenger — Teach-Tailor-Take Control. Lead with insight, not interrogation.
SPICED + MEDDICC — how they work together
| Call Type | Lead With | Score With |
|---|
| First discovery | SPICED + Gap Selling (current state) | Light MEDDICC (note gaps) |
| Second+ meeting | SPICED gaps + Gap (future state) | Full MEDDICC scorecard |
| Pre-proposal / exec | Economic buyer prep | MEDDICC must be ≥10/14 |
| Deal review (internal) | — | MEDDICC evidence inspection |
Step-by-Step Process
Phase 1: Account Research (5 min)
- Company size, industry, revenue, headquarters
- Recent news (funding, hires, launches) — potential Critical Events
- Tech stack and pain signals
- Competitive landscape and status quo risk
Phase 2: Attendee Research
Per attendee: role, tenure, priorities, LinkedIn activity, likely MEDDICC role
(Champion? Economic Buyer? Technical Buyer? Blocker?).
Phase 3: SPICED Question Bank (Discovery Calls)
| SPICED | Question Examples |
|---|
| Situation | "Walk me through how your team handles [process] today." |
| Pain | "What's the most frustrating part of that approach?" |
| Impact | "What does that cost you annually — rough order of magnitude?" |
| Critical Event | "Why is fixing this a priority now versus six months from now?" |
| Decision | "If we find a fit, what does your evaluation process look like?" |
Phase 4: MEDDICC Question Bank (Qualification Calls)
| Dimension | Question Examples | Confirmed When |
|---|
| Metrics | "How would you measure success 12 months after implementation?" | Baseline + target KPI documented |
| Economic Buyer | "Who ultimately approves budget for initiatives like this?" | EB named; meeting scheduled or completed |
| Decision Criteria | "What are the must-haves vs nice-to-haves in your evaluation?" | Criteria list documented |
| Decision Process | "Walk me through each step from today to signed contract." | Steps, owners, dates mapped |
| Identify Pain | "What happens if this problem isn't solved by [date]?" | Quantified cost of inaction |
| Champion | "Would you be comfortable presenting this internally without us?" | Four-part Champion test passed |
| Competition | "Who else are you evaluating — including doing nothing?" | Competitors + status quo named |
Phase 5: Andy Whyte — Champion Test
Score the contact before calling them a Champion:
| # | Criterion | Evidence Required |
|---|
| 1 | Power to influence the decision | Can access EB and decision committee |
| 2 | Personal win if deal closes | Career, team, or KPI benefit articulated |
| 3 | Articulates problem without you | Repeats pain accurately in their words |
| 4 | Commits to internal selling | Agrees to present or multi-thread on your behalf |
All four required for Champion score = 2. Enthusiasm alone = 1 at best.
Phase 6: MEDDICC Gap Analysis (Active Deals)
If CRM data exists, score current state and list gaps to close on this call:
MEDDICC Score: __/14
Gaps to close this meeting:
- [ ] Metrics — need quantified baseline
- [ ] Economic Buyer — identified but not met
- ...
Load pipeline-management for stage gate minimums before advancing the deal.
Phase 7: Competitive Context
- Named competitors and status quo
- Decision criteria influence strategy (
competitive-intel)
- Trap-setting questions for differentiators
Output Format
One-page meeting brief. Use templates/output-template.md for structure.
# Meeting Brief: [Company]
Date | Attendees | Deal stage | MEDDICC score: __/14
## Company Snapshot
## Attendee Profiles (+ MEDDICC role)
## SPICED Questions (discovery)
## MEDDICC Questions (gaps to close)
## Champion Test (if applicable)
## Competitive Context
## Desired Outcome + Fallback
Quality Check
Common Pitfalls
-
MEDDICC as a discovery script. Running all seven dimensions on a first call
feels like an audit. Fix: SPICED first; MEDDICC scores build over calls.
-
Champion = friendly contact. Enthusiasm without power is score 1, not 2.
Fix: apply Whyte's four-part Champion test.
-
Vendor-defined Metrics. "You'll save 30%" is not M=2. Fix: buyer must
name the KPI and baseline.
-
Ignoring status quo as Competition. "No competitors" still has a competitor:
do nothing. Fix: always assess status quo.
-
SPICED and MEDDICC in separate silos. Reps capture Impact in SPICED notes
but leave Metrics blank. Fix: Impact field populates Metrics in CRM.
Execution Artifacts
references/framework-notes.md — SPICED/MEDDICC map, Champion test, question banks
templates/output-template.md — one-page brief structure
scripts/check-output.py — validates brief sections
references/keenan-gap-selling.md — Gap Selling discovery, PIC, happy ears, checklists
Related Skills
pipeline-management — Stage gates, CRM fields, MEDDICC scorecard rules
sales-coaching — Manager deal review using same scorecard
competitive-intel — Battlecards for Competition dimension
multi-thread-orchestration — When Champion cannot access EB alone
roi-calculator — Metrics dimension business case
demo-scripts — Post-discovery demo structure