requesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, placing them in Figma or a local folder, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings from that evidence. Use when the user asks to audit, critique, review, inspect, assess, or evaluate a product experience.
Generate image-based visual alternatives, remixes, or concept directions after Product Design get-context has confirmed the design brief. Use when the user asks for design variants, visual exploration, remixes, or image-generated approaches from provided context.
Implement a selected image, screenshot, mockup, or Image Gen reference as a faithful responsive frontend after Product Design get-context has confirmed the design brief.
Use to discover specific skills for the Product Design plugin, when it is at-mentioned directly, or for any mentions of potentially relevant work, including: UX research; product, screen, or flow audits; visual ideation; app or interface design, redesign, cloning, prototyping, or implementation from ideas, URLs, images, Figma, or code; design QA; and prototype sharing or deployment.
Route coded prototype requests after Product Design get-context has confirmed the design brief. Use for building prototypes from URLs, images, mockups, Figma, existing code, or ideas that need visual exploration before build.
Clone a live URL as a runnable frontend-only local app using Browser/Chrome source evidence after Product Design get-context has confirmed the design brief.
| id | requesting-code-review |
| name | requesting-code-review |
| description | Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements |
| context | inline |
| version | 1 |
| source_repo | obra/superpowers |
Dispatch a code reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work.
Core principle: Review early, review often.
Mandatory:
Optional but valuable:
1. Get git SHAs:
BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) # or origin/main
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
2. Dispatch code reviewer subagent:
Use Task tool with general-purpose type, fill template at code-reviewer.md
Placeholders:
{DESCRIPTION} - Brief summary of what you built{PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS} - What it should do{BASE_SHA} - Starting commit{HEAD_SHA} - Ending commit3. Act on feedback:
[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]
You: Let me request code review before proceeding.
BASE_SHA=$(git log --oneline | grep "Task 1" | head -1 | awk '{print $1}')
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
[Dispatch code reviewer subagent]
DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types
PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/superpowers/plans/deployment-plan.md
BASE_SHA: a7981ec
HEAD_SHA: 3df7661
[Subagent returns]:
Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests
Issues:
Important: Missing progress indicators
Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval
Assessment: Ready to proceed
You: [Fix progress indicators]
[Continue to Task 3]
Subagent-Driven Development:
Executing Plans:
Ad-Hoc Development:
Never:
If reviewer wrong:
See template at: requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md