القائمة
Phase 11 Multi-Persona Product Review. Evaluates final product from 10 different professional perspectives to ensure real-world readiness. Triggered after Phase 10 Quality Score passes (>= 80).
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
MANDATORY workflow for GitHub Speckit projects. Enforces Spec-First → Clarify → Research → Evaluate → Design → Plan → TDD → Review, with optional Constitution and quality checks. Activates when working in projects with .github/speckit/ directory.
Spawn parallel worker terminals to execute multi-domain tasks concurrently. Use when 3+ independent tasks span 2+ domains (frontend, backend, testing, security, etc.)
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation. Use to identify inconsistencies before implementation.
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements. Checklists are "unit tests for requirements" - they validate quality, clarity, and completeness of requirements in a given domain.
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec. Use after /speckit.specify to resolve ambiguities before research and evaluation.
Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs, ensuring all dependent templates stay in sync. Use when starting a new Speckit project or updating project principles.
| name | product-review |
| description | Phase 11 Multi-Persona Product Review. Evaluates final product from 10 different professional perspectives to ensure real-world readiness. Triggered after Phase 10 Quality Score passes (>= 80). |
Phase 11 evaluates the complete product (not just code) from multiple professional perspectives. While Phase 10 verifies code quality, Phase 11 ensures the product is ready for the real world.
Why This Matters:
IF Phase 10 Quality Score >= 80:
THEN Execute Phase 11
ELSE:
FIX Phase 10 issues first
| Persona | Agent | Focus Area | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| User | product-reviewer-user | UX, value delivery, usability | 20% |
| Designer | product-reviewer-designer | Visual, accessibility, polish | 15% |
| Entrepreneur | product-reviewer-entrepreneur | PMF, business viability, moat | 20% |
| Marketer | product-reviewer-marketer | GTM, virality, conversion | 15% |
| Developer | product-reviewer-developer | Maintainability, tech debt | 10% |
| Persona | Agent | When to Include | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investor | product-reviewer-investor | Seeking funding | 5% |
| CS Lead | product-reviewer-cs | User-facing product | 5% |
| Legal | product-reviewer-legal | Data/privacy sensitive | 5% |
| Analyst | product-reviewer-analyst | Data-driven product | 5% |
| DevOps | product-reviewer-devops | Production deployment | 5% |
Always include:
- User (20%)
- Designer (15%)
- Entrepreneur (20%)
- Marketer (15%)
- Developer (10%)
Include if applicable:
- Investor: IF seeking_funding = true
- CS: IF has_user_support = true
- Legal: IF handles_personal_data = true OR regulated_industry = true
- Analyst: IF data_driven = true
- DevOps: IF self_hosted = true OR complex_infra = true
Adjust weights proportionally to sum = 100%
Launch all active personas in parallel (background):
task(
subagent_type="product-reviewer-user",
run_in_background=true,
prompt="Evaluate product from end-user perspective..."
)
task(
subagent_type="product-reviewer-designer",
run_in_background=true,
prompt="Evaluate product design and UX..."
)
... (repeat for all active personas)
Wait for all to complete.
Collect results.
## Score Calculation
Product Score = Σ (Persona Score × Weight)
Example (Core 5 only):
- User: 85/100 × 0.25 = 21.25
- Designer: 78/100 × 0.20 = 15.60
- Entrepreneur: 82/100 × 0.25 = 20.50
- Marketer: 71/100 × 0.18 = 12.78
- Developer: 90/100 × 0.12 = 10.80
─────────────────────────────────
Product Score = 80.93/100
## Phase 11 Product Review Complete
### Overall Product Score: [X]/100
### Persona Breakdown
| Persona | Score | Weight | Weighted |
|---------|-------|--------|----------|
| User | X/100 | 25% | X |
| Designer | X/100 | 20% | X |
| Entrepreneur | X/100 | 25% | X |
| Marketer | X/100 | 18% | X |
| Developer | X/100 | 12% | X |
### Red Flags (Score < 70)
- [ ] [Persona]: [Issue] - [Impact]
### Strengths (Score > 85)
- [ ] [Persona]: [Strength]
### Critical Issues (Must Fix)
1. ...
### Recommendations (Should Fix)
1. ...
### Quick Wins (Low Effort, High Impact)
1. ...
### Launch Readiness
- [ ] Product Score >= 75: Ready to launch
- [ ] All Critical Issues resolved
- [ ] No Red Flags blocking launch
| Score Range | Decision | Action |
|---|---|---|
| >= 85 | EXCELLENT | Launch immediately |
| 75-84 | GOOD | Launch with noted improvements |
| 65-74 | ACCEPTABLE | Launch to beta only, iterate |
| < 65 | NOT READY | Do not launch, fix issues first |
Even if overall score is high, block if:
- User Score < 60 (unusable)
- Legal Score < 60 (compliance risk)
- DevOps Score < 50 (unstable)
- Security issues found (from Developer review)
You are product-reviewer-user. Evaluate this product.
Product: [Product Name]
Target User: [User Description]
Core Problem: [Problem Statement]
Evaluate from end-user perspective:
1. First Impression (0-10)
2. Onboarding Experience (0-10)
3. Core Task Completion (0-10)
4. Performance & Speed (0-10)
5. Frustration Points (0-10)
6. Delight Moments (0-10)
7. Problem-Solution Fit (0-10)
8. Would Return (0-10)
9. Would Recommend (0-10)
10. Would Pay (0-10)
For each, provide:
- Score with justification
- Specific evidence
- Improvement suggestion
End with:
- Overall User Score: X/100
- Top 3 Issues
- Top 3 Strengths
- Key Quote: "As a [user], I felt [emotion] because [reason]"
You are product-reviewer-designer. Evaluate this product.
Product: [Product Name]
Design System: [If exists]
Evaluate design and UX:
1. Visual Hierarchy (0-10)
2. Typography (0-10)
3. Color System (0-10)
4. Layout & Spacing (0-10)
5. Interaction Design (0-10)
6. Consistency (0-10)
7. Responsive Design (0-10)
8. Accessibility (0-10)
9. Polish & Detail (0-10)
10. Innovation & Delight (0-10)
Include:
- WCAG 2.1 compliance check
- Responsive breakpoint test
- Color contrast validation
End with:
- Overall Design Score: X/100
- Critical Design Issues
- Accessibility Concerns
- Polish Recommendations
You are product-reviewer-entrepreneur. Evaluate this product.
Product: [Product Name]
Market: [Target Market]
Competitors: [Known Competitors]
Evaluate business viability:
1. Problem-Solution Fit (0-10)
2. Value Proposition Clarity (0-10)
3. Target Market Definition (0-10)
4. Competitive Differentiation (0-10)
5. Business Model Viability (0-10)
6. Scalability (0-10)
7. Market Size (0-10)
8. Timing (0-10)
9. Founder-Market Fit (0-10)
10. Execution Quality (0-10)
End with:
- Overall Business Score: X/100
- Investment Potential: [Would/Wouldn't invest, why]
- Key Risks
- Strategic Recommendations
- Potential Pivots (if needed)
You are product-reviewer-marketer. Evaluate this product.
Product: [Product Name]
Current Channels: [If any]
Evaluate go-to-market readiness:
1. Hook Quality (0-10)
2. Landing Page Effectiveness (0-10)
3. Viral Potential (0-10)
4. SEO Readiness (0-10)
5. Conversion Funnel (0-10)
6. Social Proof (0-10)
7. Messaging Clarity (0-10)
8. Mobile Marketing Readiness (0-10)
9. Retention Mechanics (0-10)
10. Competitive Positioning (0-10)
End with:
- Overall GTM Score: X/100
- Top Growth Opportunities
- Critical Marketing Gaps
- Suggested Experiments
- Headline/CTA Recommendations
You are product-reviewer-developer. Evaluate this product.
Product: [Product Name]
Tech Stack: [Stack Details]
Evaluate technical sustainability:
1. Code Readability (0-10)
2. Documentation Quality (0-10)
3. Test Coverage & Quality (0-10)
4. Architecture Quality (0-10)
5. Error Handling & Logging (0-10)
6. Security Practices (0-10)
7. Performance Considerations (0-10)
8. Development Experience (0-10)
9. Deployment & Operations (0-10)
10. Technical Debt (0-10)
End with:
- Overall Maintainability Score: X/100
- Would I Want to Maintain This: [Yes/No, why]
- Critical Tech Debt Items
- Security Concerns
- Onboarding Time Estimate
Phase 10: Quality Score (Code)
↓ (IF Score >= 80)
Phase 11: Product Review (Multi-Persona)
↓ (IF Score >= 75)
LAUNCH READY
Add to oh-my-speckit SKILL.md:
## Phase 11: Multi-Persona Product Review (AUTO-EXECUTE)
**Triggered after Phase 10 >= 80**
1. Determine active personas based on product type
2. Launch all reviewers in parallel (background)
3. Aggregate scores with weights
4. Generate comprehensive report
5. Decision:
- Score >= 75: Proceed to launch
- Score < 75: Fix issues, re-review
## Phase 11 Product Review Complete
### ADHD CBT App Evaluation
**Overall Product Score: 78/100** ✅ (Launch Ready)
### Persona Breakdown
| Persona | Score | Weight | Weighted | Status |
|---------|-------|--------|----------|--------|
| User | 82/100 | 25% | 20.5 | ✅ |
| Designer | 75/100 | 20% | 15.0 | ✅ |
| Entrepreneur | 80/100 | 25% | 20.0 | ✅ |
| Marketer | 68/100 | 18% | 12.2 | ⚠️ |
| Developer | 88/100 | 12% | 10.6 | ✅ |
### Red Flags (Score < 70)
⚠️ **Marketer (68/100)**:
- Weak hook - "CBT for ADHD" not compelling
- No viral mechanics
- No social proof yet
### Strengths (Score > 85)
✅ **Developer (88/100)**:
- Excellent code quality
- Comprehensive tests
- Well-documented
### Critical Issues (Must Fix Before Launch)
1. **Improve marketing hook**
- Current: "ADHD CBT App"
- Suggested: "Rewire Your ADHD Brain in 5 Minutes a Day"
### Recommendations
1. Add testimonial section (even if just quotes)
2. Implement share feature for completed exercises
3. Add streak/gamification for retention
### Quick Wins
1. Update headline (10 min)
2. Add "as seen on" placeholder (5 min)
3. Add social share buttons (1 hr)
### Launch Readiness Checklist
- [x] Product Score >= 75
- [x] No User Score < 60
- [x] No Legal Score < 60
- [x] No DevOps Score < 50
- [ ] All Critical Issues resolved ← PENDING
**Recommendation**: Fix marketing hook, then launch to beta.
Create custom personas for specific industries:
# Healthcare SaaS
additional_personas:
- product-reviewer-clinician
- product-reviewer-patient
- product-reviewer-hipaa
# Fintech
additional_personas:
- product-reviewer-compliance
- product-reviewer-risk
- product-reviewer-trader
Adjust weights based on product stage:
# Early Stage (focus on PMF)
weights:
user: 30%
entrepreneur: 30%
designer: 15%
marketer: 15%
developer: 10%
# Growth Stage (focus on scale)
weights:
user: 20%
marketer: 25%
devops: 20%
analyst: 15%
developer: 10%
designer: 10%
"A product that only engineers love is a technical success and a market failure. A product that only marketers love is a sales pitch without substance. Excellence requires all perspectives."
Phase 11 ensures we ship products, not just code.