| name | researchstack-experiment-ops |
| description | Experimental-process management skill for research projects. Use when Codex should structure runbooks, logging,
checkpointing, seed control, result triage, failure analysis, experiment queues, and evidence collection so that the
day-to-day experimental workflow stays publication-grade instead of devolving into ad hoc trial-and-error.
|
Experiment Ops
Read ../researchstack/references/workflow.md.
Use the bundled templates:
Operate like a disciplined lab manager.
For ongoing experiments, enforce:
- Clear run naming and provenance.
- Explicit seed and environment capture.
- Separation between exploratory runs and paper-claim runs.
- Result logs that explain failures, not only wins.
- Promotion rules for when a result is allowed into the paper.
Produce practical artifacts such as:
- experiment queue,
- runbook template,
- result triage checklist,
- failure taxonomy,
- promotion criteria for plots and tables.
When the user has no existing structure, instantiate the bundled templates instead of inventing ad hoc formats.
Be strict about process failures:
- overwritten outputs,
- undocumented config changes,
- inconsistent warmup or stopping criteria,
- comparing runs from mismatched code versions,
- repeated cherry-picking without negative-result accounting.