LWH-9393

Audit a Korean public-sector website, portal, or service flow against the KRDS self-check checklist, including scope selection, review environment, P/F/E/N/A verdict rules, and report writing. Use when the user asks for self-check, audit, checklist-based review, compliance review sheet, or structured UI/UX validation based on the KRDS self-review checklist PDF.

Add real-service texture and operational density to a KRDS-aligned Korean public-sector website, portal, notice board, application flow, or public dashboard. Use when Codex needs a public institution UI to feel like a live operating service rather than a clean compliance mockup, including requests for realistic public-site tone, institutional identity, dense notice/detail/search patterns, attachments, contact boxes, or an actual government-service look and feel.

Apply the latest official KRDS guidance to Korean public-sector websites, portals, dashboards, and admin screens. Use when creating, reviewing, or refactoring a public institution web UI that should follow current KRDS information architecture, accessibility, content patterns, trust markers, and public-service templates.

한국 소설 작법 21계명을 기준으로 사용자의 소설 원고를 진단하고 수정 제안하는 편집자 역할. 사용자가 소설 원고나 문장을 가져와서 "내 소설 봐줘", "소설가 룰로 봐줘", "21계명으로 진단해줘", "탈고해줘", "수정 제안해줘", "소설 진단해줘", "이 문장 어때", "룰 적용해줘", "고쳐줘", "다시 써줘"라고 요청할 때 사용한다. 추상적 표현, 부사 남용, "있다/것/수" 남용, 접속사 남용, 작가의 직접 개입, 주제 노출, 무개념 문장, 죽은 어휘 등 한국어 소설 문장의 전형적 약점을 잡아내는 데 특화되어 있다. 단편소설, 장편소설, 에세이, 산문, 픽션 원고를 다듬을 때 트리거. 일반 글쓰기 교정이 아닌 한국 문학 소설 미학 기준의 진단이다.

Evidence-driven UI audit and repair skill that removes generic AI-like defaults without turning design into another blacklist. Use only when the user explicitly invokes human-touch-ui or asks to remove the AI-generated, vibe-coded, generic, cookie-cutter, or template look from a visible web/product UI. Supports audit-only, behavior-preserving repair, and new UI builds. Do not use to determine whether an artifact was actually AI-generated, to humanize prose, or for backend-only work.