project-overview-assessment

name	project-overview-assessment
description	High-level assessment for the HealthGuard project. Triggers on keywords: project structure, project overview, tong quan, review architecture, assess structure. Uses MASTER_INDEX to optimize context.
risk	safe
source	custom
date_added	2026-03-03
date_updated	2026-03-04

Skill: Project Overview Assessment (TongQuan)

Purpose

Evaluate the holistic structure and progress of the HealthGuard project to ensure it aligns with the SRS, follows industry-standard architecture, and stays on track with JIRA sprint tasks (Epics/Stories).

When to Use This Skill

Automatically activates when the user wants to:

• Evaluate the overall project or a specific large section
• Verify if the existing codebase structure reflects the SRS correctly
• Review progress against JIRA sprints (Epics & Stories)
• Report the project status to stakeholders

Context Loading Protocol (MANDATORY)

[!IMPORTANT] The Agent MUST strictly follow this 3-tier loading protocol to optimize token limits and prevent getting lost in context.

Tier 1: Navigation (ALWAYS read first)

1. Read PM_REVIEW/MASTER_INDEX.md — The overall GPS map of the project.
2. Read PM_REVIEW/Resources/SRS_INDEX.md — System-level context (architecture, features, thresholds).
3. Determine the assessment scope (Admin / Mobile / or both).

Tier 2: Prepare Integrated Skills

3. CRITICAL: Before evaluating, read the internal bundled skills under skills/ to inherit their high-level structural rules:
   • skills/architect-review/SKILL.md
   • skills/software-architecture/SKILL.md
   • skills/backend-architect/SKILL.md
   • skills/architecture-patterns/SKILL.md

Tier 3: Structure (Read based on scope)

4. Read the corresponding Project_Structure.md (Admin or Mobile).

Tier 4: Summaries (Read ONLY relevant summaries)

5. Read related summary files from the summaries/ folder.

⛔ WHAT NOT TO DO

• ❌ DO NOT read the full SRS document — use the summary files instead. If more detail is needed, read the specific Use Case (UC) file in PM_REVIEW/Resources/UC/.
• ❌ DO NOT read the full JIRA CSV — use PM_REVIEW/Resources/TASK/JIRA/README.md (JIRA Index) to quickly locate Epics/Stories, then read only relevant rows from the CSV.
• ❌ DO NOT read the entire source code — only scan the folder structure for overviews.

Evaluation Process (Progressive Deepening)

Step 1: Complete the Context Loading Protocol. Step 2: Source Code Scan (Surface Level). Browse folder structure without reading file contents, comparing against Project_Structure.md. Step 3: Evaluate against 6 Criteria: SRS Compliance, Architecture, Consistency, Progress vs JIRA, Code Quality, Security. READ references/evaluation-criteria.md for specific check details. Step 4: Cross-check with JIRA Stories from the JIRA Index.

Output File Protocol (MANDATORY)

File Naming Convention

The review file MUST follow this naming pattern:

TONGQUAN_{PROJECT}_review.md

• PROJECT: Project name, UPPERCASE (e.g., ADMIN, MOBILE)
• If reviewing both projects → create 2 separate files or TONGQUAN_ALL_review.md

Output Location

• Admin project → PM_REVIEW/REVIEW_ADMIN/TONGQUAN_ADMIN_review.md
• Mobile project → PM_REVIEW/REVIEW_MOBILE/TONGQUAN_MOBILE_review.md

Examples

User Request	File Output
"Overview assessment for Admin project"	REVIEW_ADMIN/TONGQUAN_ADMIN_review.md
"Overview assessment for Mobile"	REVIEW_MOBILE/TONGQUAN_MOBILE_review.md

Re-review Protocol (2nd review and beyond)

[!IMPORTANT] Before starting a review, the AI MUST check if a previous review file already exists. If found → perform comparison.

Step 1: Find previous review file

1. Determine the filename using the Output File Protocol above.
2. Check if the file exists in REVIEW_ADMIN/ or REVIEW_MOBILE/.

Step 2: Read previous review file (if exists)

3. Read the old review file and extract:
   • Old score: Total score + score per criterion.
   • Old weaknesses: List of all weaknesses.
   • Old recommendations: List of action recommendations.
   • Old review date: From the "Thông tin chung" section.
   • Old review count: From the "Thông tin chung" section (if present).

Step 3: Perform new review as normal

4. Execute the review following the Evaluation Process above (Step 1–4).

Step 4: Compare and evaluate changes

5. Compare new results with data extracted from the old file:
   • Score increase/decrease per criterion.
   • Weaknesses that have been fixed (present in old, absent in new).
   • Weaknesses that still exist (present in both old and new).
   • Weaknesses that are newly introduced (absent in old, present in new).

Step 5: Overwrite old file

6. OVERWRITE the old review file with the complete new report, including the "🔄 SO SÁNH VỚI LẦN ĐÁNH GIÁ TRƯỚC" section (per template references/report-template.md).
7. Increment the Lần đánh giá counter by 1.

Important Notes

• If NO previous file found → this is the first review → do NOT add comparison section, set Lần đánh giá: 1.
• If previous file found → MUST add comparison section and increment Lần đánh giá.

Output Formatting

MANDATORY: You must use the Vietnamese markdown reporting template located at references/report-template.md. You must not deviate from this template.

After Review: Update MASTER_INDEX (MANDATORY)

When the overview review concludes, you MUST update MASTER_INDEX.md:

1. Set Review Status → ✅ Done (for each module assessed)
2. Set Score → XX/100 (if individual module scores are given)
3. Set Quality → Determined by score (see DanhGiaChiTiet/references/evaluation-criteria.md → Score Classification):
   • 76–100 → ✅ Pass
   • 51–75 → ⚠️ Needs Fix
   • 0–50 → ❌ Fail
4. Set Review File → Link to the overview review file (e.g., [View](REVIEW_ADMIN/TONGQUAN_ADMIN_review.md))
5. Set Last Review → Current date (ISO format)

Edge Cases

Scenario	Action
Summary file does not exist for a module	Note as "Missing summary" in the report, skip detailed assessment for that module
Source code folder is empty / not built	Mark as "⬜ Not built" in report, score = N/A
MASTER_INDEX row missing for a module	Add the row with available info
Previous review file is corrupted/unreadable	Treat as first review, set Lần đánh giá: 1

Reference Documents

Name	Path	When to read
MASTER INDEX	PM_REVIEW/MASTER_INDEX.md	ALWAYS
SRS Index	PM_REVIEW/Resources/SRS_INDEX.md	ALWAYS — System-level context
Admin Structure	PM_REVIEW/REVIEW_ADMIN/Project_Structure.md	When reviewing Admin
Mobile Structure	PM_REVIEW/REVIEW_MOBILE/Project_Structure.md	When reviewing Mobile
Admin Summaries	PM_REVIEW/REVIEW_ADMIN/summaries/*.md	Based on module
Mobile Summaries	PM_REVIEW/REVIEW_MOBILE/summaries/*.md	Based on module
DB Summary	PM_REVIEW/SQL SCRIPTS/README.md	When reviewing database design
Use Cases (UC)	PM_REVIEW/Resources/UC/**/*.md	When explicit detail is missing from summaries
JIRA Index	PM_REVIEW/Resources/TASK/JIRA/README.md	ALWAYS — Quick lookup for Epics/Stories
JIRA Full CSV	PM_REVIEW/Resources/TASK/JIRA/JIRA_IMPORT_ALL.csv	Only when need full Story details