بنقرة واحدة
fixing-metadata
Fix metadata issues. Use for SEO/social metadata audits or fixes.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Fix metadata issues. Use for SEO/social metadata audits or fixes.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Use this skill when the user wants to test a business idea, strategy, or initiative against real-world risk. Triggers include: 'test my idea', 'what are the riskiest assumptions', 'help me validate this', 'run EMT on this', 'extract assumptions', 'assumption mapping', 'what could go wrong with this plan', 'pressure test this', 'validate this plan', 'what could go wrong with this strategy', 'identify hidden risk in this idea', or any request to pressure-test a business decision before committing resources. Runs a guided Extract → Map → Test system based on David J. Bland's Precoil methodology.
Calibrate an LLM judge against human labels using data splits, TPR/TNR, and bias correction. Use after writing a judge prompt (write-judge-prompt) when you need to verify alignment before trusting its outputs. Do NOT use for code-based evaluators (those are deterministic; test with standard unit tests).
Generate beautiful, self-contained HTML pages that visually explain systems, code changes, plans, and data. Use when the user asks for a diagram, architecture overview, diff review, plan review, project recap, comparison table, or any visual explanation of technical concepts. Also use proactively when you are about to render a complex ASCII table (4+ rows or 3+ columns) — present it as a styled HTML page instead.
This skill should be used when shaping a software change and needing to breadboard the solution at the right level of abstraction (places, affordances, connections), including mapping an existing system via UI + code affordances, producing a wiring diagram, a parts/BOM plan, a fit check, and (when relevant) an extract-vs-duplicate analysis.
Clarify requirements before implementing. Do not use automatically, only when invoked explicitly.
This skill should be used when a user needs a demo package that starts with a live demo (not slides) and produces both a demo script and a navigable single-file HTML runbook, including caveats, respectful competitive comparison, and LLM architecture details (RAG, evals, observability).
| name | fixing-metadata |
| description | Fix metadata issues. Use for SEO/social metadata audits or fixes. |
Source: ui-skills.com.
Ship correct, complete metadata.
fixing-metadata to apply these constraints to any metadata work in this conversation.Do not introduce new frameworks or SEO libraries unless explicitly requested. Prefer minimal diffs.
Reference these guidelines when:
| priority | category | impact |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | correctness and duplication | critical |
| 2 | title and description | high |
| 3 | canonical and indexing | high |
| 4 | social cards | high |
| 5 | icons and manifest | medium |
| 6 | structured data | medium |
| 7 | locale and alternates | low-medium |
| 8 | tool boundaries | critical |
pnpm lint, pnpm test, pnpm build, pnpm verify; report GO or NO-GO with evidence.