القائمة
Use this skill to review tests for false confidence, excessive mocking, meaningless assertions, and weak behavior coverage. Use after writing tests or when a suite passes but bugs still escape.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns ("AI-isms"). Use this skill when asked to "remove AI-isms," "clean up AI writing," "edit writing for AI patterns," "audit writing for AI tells," or "make this sound less like AI." Supports a detect-only mode, an edit-in-place mode for files, an optional voice profile (casual / professional / technical / warm / blunt), and an iterate-to-convergence pass.
Use this skill when reviewing production code for dead code, duplication, unnecessary complexity, and non-idiomatic patterns. Use after implementing a feature, after refactors, or whenever code quality feedback is requested.
Multi-agent debate with visible transcripts where agents respond to each other. USE WHEN council, debate, perspectives, weigh options, deliberate, multiple viewpoints. Unlike RedTeam (adversarial), Council is collaborative-adversarial.
Summarize or extract text/transcripts from URLs, podcasts, and local files (great fallback for “transcribe this YouTube/video”).
Use this skill when the user asks to "commit", "make a commit", "commit my changes", "create a commit", or invokes /commit. Detects the active VCS (git, jj, or hg), inspects the working copy, drafts a commit message in the project's standard format (terse summary + detailed paragraph + test plan), and creates the commit. Honors staged-files-only when files are already staged in git. Handles jj-specific traps (interactive editors, conflict states, the operation log, the post-commit working copy gotcha) without dropping into TUIs that block non-interactive shells.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "brainstorm", "design a feature", "think through an idea", "help me plan", or has a vague concept that needs refining into a technical specification through collaborative dialogue.
| name | test-reviewer |
| description | Use this skill to review tests for false confidence, excessive mocking, meaningless assertions, and weak behavior coverage. Use after writing tests or when a suite passes but bugs still escape. |
| version | 0.1.0 |
Evaluate whether tests provide real safety signals or merely appear to do so.
When trimming bloat, keep a single smoke / assert self-check as the minimum —
never delete the last line that fails when the logic breaks.
Use this structure:
Tests that provide false confidence.
High-impact rewrites that improve confidence.
Minor improvements for clarity and maintainability.
For each finding:
For build-time discipline (write the smallest test that catches the bug), pair
this with the ponytail skill.
