single-tool-per-job

name	single-tool-per-job
description	Biome is enough. I don't run ESLint or Prettier — never alongside Biome, never instead of it. For every other job (types, tests, packages, build, scripts), one tool. Use when adding lint/format/build/test tooling, when proposing dev dependencies, or when user mentions "Biome", "ESLint", "Prettier", "consolidate tools", or asks "should I add X".

Single tool per job

Music on; nonsense off.

Tooling sprawl is debt. ESLint + Prettier + import-sort plugin + sort-keys plugin is four tools doing what Biome does in one — four config files, four peer-dependency trees, four editor extensions, four CI steps, four ways to break.

I don't pay that tax. Biome is enough.

When this skill is active

You are about to:

• Add a dev dependency for linting, formatting, testing, building, or workspace management
• Configure a new tool's config file
• Add a CI step that wraps a tool
• Recommend a tool to me without checking what's already in package.json

The Biome rule (non-negotiable)

In my repos, Biome is the linter and the formatter. Both jobs. Together. There is no "Biome alongside ESLint", no "Biome but Prettier for Markdown". If eslint, prettier, eslint-*, or prettier-* shows up in a pnpm add you're proposing, the answer is no.

If a repo I'm in already has ESLint or Prettier (legacy work, third-party fork), the migration is its own task — surface it, propose it, but don't run two linters at once "for safety". Two linters at once is the worst of both worlds: contradictory autofixes and double the CI time.

This is the one place in single-tool-per-job where the rule isn't "prefer the existing tool" — it's "Biome wins".

The defaults table (everywhere else)

Job	My tool	Don't add
Lint + format + import sort	Biome	ESLint, Prettier, eslint-*, prettier-*, simple-import-sort
Types	tsc	Babel for type-stripping, Flow
Tests	node:test + borp + c8	Jest, Vitest, Mocha, Chai, Sinon, @types/jest, nyc
Packages + workspaces	pnpm (via corepack)	npm, yarn, lerna, nx for workspace orchestration alone
Pre-commit	biome check --staged	husky + lint-staged + prettier + eslint chain
Build (TS lib)	tsdown or tsc --build	rollup + plugins + tsup + babel
Run TS scripts	node --experimental-strip-types (22.6+) or tsx	ts-node + @types/node + esbuild-register

For tools other than ESLint/Prettier, the principle is "don't migrate unprompted" — see result-not-throw. New additions to the repo follow this table; existing Jest/Mocha setups don't get rewritten as a side effect.

Biome quick reference

biome lint .                  # lint only
biome format .                # format only
biome check .                 # lint + format + organize imports
biome check --write .         # auto-fix safe transforms
biome check --write --unsafe  # auto-fix including unsafe
biome ci .                    # CI-optimised output
biome check --staged          # pre-commit

// package.json
{
  "scripts": {
    "lint": "biome check .",
    "lint:fix": "biome check --write ."
  }
}

For the full biome.json template, see setup-mateonunez-skills/seeds/seed-biome-2x.json.

The check before adding anything

Before pnpm add -D <thing>:

1. What job does this tool do? Name it in one phrase.
2. Is a tool in the current package.json already responsible for that job? If yes, replacement only — not addition.
3. Is the runtime / language standard library responsible for it? If yes (node:test, node:assert, Intl), the new tool needs to justify why the standard isn't enough.
4. Can you write a one-paragraph rationale for the tool's config? If not, you don't need the tool.

If it doesn't hold up against those four, it doesn't make the cut.

Anti-patterns

• ESLint and Biome. No. Biome is enough.
• Prettier and Biome. No. Biome formats.
• "Just for .md files we'll keep Prettier" / "Just for the legacy package we'll keep ESLint". Carve-outs become permanent. Pick one, retire the other.
• husky + lint-staged when biome check --staged works. Two tools to do what one does.
• Adding nx to a small monorepo for caching. pnpm + --filter covers it. Reach for nx/turbo only when build times actually hurt.
• Replacing a working tool because it trended. "I saw it on Twitter" is not a justification.
• Adding a CLI for something a one-line script handles. If find . -name '*.ts' | xargs ... works, no tool needed.

When two tools are genuinely complementary

Some pairings are fine because the jobs are different: Biome (lint/format) + tsc (types) + node:test (tests). The rule isn't "one tool total" — it's "one tool per job". Type-checking is not formatting; testing is not linting.