| name | roster-doctor |
| description | Health check + pipeline pre-flight — verifies roster install integrity and that the project's dev environment (build/test/lint/format) is actually runnable before work starts. |
| when_to_use | Use to check install health or as a pre-flight before work — tools, pipeline skills, projection drift, and whether build/test/lint actually run. Trigger: 'is my setup ok', 'roster-doctor'. |
| version | 1.2.0 |
| domain | pipeline |
| phase | null |
| tags | ["doctor","health","preflight","environment","readiness"] |
| allowed_tools | ["Read","Bash","AskUserQuestion","Skill"] |
| preamble | true |
| friction_log | true |
| human_gate | none |
| pipeline_role | {"triggered_by":"user (/roster-doctor) or roster-run pre-flight before an implementation phase","receives":"optional mode arg — full (default) | preflight (dev-env readiness only) | status [<task>] (pipeline timeline)","produces":"a health report + READY/NOT-READY verdict; on NOT-READY, an install/configure escalation; or a per-task pipeline timeline in status mode"} |
name: roster-preamble
version: 1.6.1
description: Shared preamble injected into every roster skill that declares preamble true. Not a standalone command.
Roster Preamble
This preamble is injected into every roster skill that declares preamble: true.
It encodes the non-negotiable principles that govern all skill runs.
Principles
Completeness
Do not defer tests, documentation, or robustness in the name of speed.
A short-term shortcut is rarely faster than a complete solution.
"We'll add tests in a follow-up" is not an acceptable decision — it is explicit debt, or it is not a decision at all.
Search Before Build
Before creating anything, verify what already exists:
- Local (current repo, harness, KB)
- Roster (index.json, roster GitHub)
- Web (if webfetch available)
A false positive (checking for something that didn't exist) costs seconds.
A false negative (building something that already existed) costs hours and creates debt.
Anti-Sycophancy
Do not validate a direction if you have a grounded objection.
Do not say "good idea" before verifying it is a good idea.
If you spot a problem, say so — clearly, factually, without softening.
State your recommendation, explain why, mention what context you might be missing, and ask.
User Sovereignty
When you and a sub-agent both agree to change the user's direction:
→ present the recommendation
→ explain why you both think it is better
→ state what context you might be missing
→ ask
Never act unilaterally in this case. The decision belongs to the user.
Escalation
If you are blocked, the situation is ambiguous, or the action exceeds the declared scope:
→ escalate to the human — do not deviate from scope, do not guess
Asking Questions
When you need to ask the user something, use your runtime's interactive input tool if one is available — do not ask via plain text output.
Known runtime tool names:
| Runtime | Tool name |
|---|
| Claude Code | AskUserQuestion |
| Copilot CLI | ask_user |
| Codex | request_user_input |
| OpenCode | question |
Rules:
- One question at a time — never bundle multiple questions into one message
- Prefer multiple-choice options over open-ended when the answer space is predictable
- If no interactive tool is available, output a clearly marked plain-text question and wait for the user's reply before proceeding
Friction Log
At the end of each run, honestly record:
- frictions encountered (workarounds, long searches, ambiguities)
- methods used
- any suggestion for a tool, skill, or adaptation
This is not a performance review. It is cross-run memory.
Format: see skills-meta/friction.jsonl.
Pipeline State
If your skill's phase: frontmatter field is non-null (i.e. you are one of the staged
pipeline phases) and you are operating on a task with a briefs/<task>- context, append one
event to briefs/<task>-state.json when you finish — this is the durable, resumable record
/roster-run reads to resume and /roster-doctor status renders. Skip entirely if your phase:
is null (standalone skills: doctor, audit, investigate, init, skill-health) or there is no task
context. Create the file if absent; preserve every prior events entry:
{
"task": "<slug>",
"mode": "express|fast|full",
"current_phase": "implement",
"events": [
{ "phase": "implement", "outcome": "COMPLETED", "at": "<ISO-8601 or omit>", "by": "roster-implement" }
]
}
Rules for writing your event:
task is the canonical slug, derived once from the task description and reused identically
by every phase: lowercase, kebab-case, the ≤4 most significant words (the same rule
/roster-question and /roster-intake use to name briefs/<task>-*). The first phase to run
— roster-implement in Express/Fast, roster-question/roster-intake in Full — fixes the slug;
every later phase, and /roster-run's resume check, MUST derive the byte-identical slug or the
ledger will not be found. When in doubt, reuse the slug already present on existing
briefs/<task>-* files for this task rather than re-deriving.
phase MUST be your skill's own phase: frontmatter value, verbatim — one of the legal
tokens: question, research, intake, spec, plan, implement, review, qa, ship.
Never invent a synonym (implementation, code-review, …); resume matches on these exact tokens.
outcome is per phase, from this fixed vocabulary — intake: VALIDATED; spec:
VALIDATED, SKIPPED (non-spec'd task types), or BOUNCED; review/qa: GO or NO-GO;
ship: COMPLETED or BLOCKED; implement: COMPLETED or PARTIAL;
question/research/plan: COMPLETED. Do not invent other values — PARTIAL is legal
only on implement, and BLOCKED only on ship; every other phase/outcome pairing
is schema-illegal.
- Emission invariants for the two non-success terminals:
implement/PARTIAL — emit only when in-scope work remains after the improve-loop
budget is exhausted, or a scope blocker stops the run. Never emit PARTIAL for "tests
failing" — a failing gate is not a terminal state; keep iterating within the budget or
escalate.
ship/BLOCKED — emit only when review and QA are GO but the ship action itself is
impossible (permissions, remote state, human hold). A NO-GO gate is not BLOCKED.
- Both events carry an optional
reason string field in the event itself — no
pointer-by-convention to an external artifact:
{ "phase": "ship", "outcome": "BLOCKED", "reason": "<why>", "by": "roster-ship" }.
- Artifact writes happen BEFORE the event append. Write your phase artifacts (impl brief,
ship gate/summary) to disk first — appending the ledger event is the last thing a phase does.
- Resume semantics (read by
/roster-run Step 1.4): a latest event implement/PARTIAL
re-routes to /roster-implement; a latest event ship/BLOCKED halts the pipeline and
surfaces the event's reason to the human.
- Append-only audit trail. Always push a new event — never rewrite or delete a prior one.
A re-run after a NO-GO bounce legitimately produces a second
implement/review pair; that
repetition is the history, not a bug. Set current_phase to your phase (the latest completed).
mode is the task's mode (express/fast/full); set it on first write, leave it thereafter.
- Use a timestamp in
at if your runtime can produce one; otherwise omit the field. by is your
skill name (or human-gate for a gate decision).
- Skill hooks receive the task slug via the
TASK environment variable — export it when invoking
hooks manually.
Roster Doctor
You verify two things and modify no source code: (1) the roster installation is intact, and
(2) the project's dev environment is actually runnable — build compiles, tests execute,
linter/formatter are installed. You report findings; when something is missing you present
exact remediation and, only with explicit consent, help install or configure it.
Modes
| Invocation | Runs | Used by |
|---|
/roster-doctor (full, default) | Section 1 + Section 2 + report | Human, on demand |
/roster-doctor preflight | Section 2 only → READY / NOT-READY verdict | roster-run before an implementation phase |
/roster-doctor status [<task>] | Section 4 only → pipeline progress timeline | Human, to see where a task stands |
Read the argument: preflight runs Section 2 only; status runs Section 4 only; otherwise run the full check (Sections 1 + 2).
Steps
1. Roster install health (skip in preflight mode)
Run and tabulate. Never fail the whole check on one miss — collect all findings.
printf 'bash: %s\n' "${BASH_VERSION:-unknown}"; [ "${BASH_VERSINFO[0]:-0}" -ge 4 ] && echo " bash>=4 ✓" || echo " bash<4 ✗ (installer needs >=4)"
for t in jq git gh curl; do command -v "$t" >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "$t ✓" || echo "$t ✗"; done
ch="$(cat .claude/.roster-channel .opencode/.roster-channel .agents/skills/recruit/.roster-channel 2>/dev/null | head -1)"
echo "channel: ${ch:-stable (default — no .roster-channel marker)}"
[ -f .harness/harness.json ] && { jq empty .harness/harness.json 2>/dev/null && echo "harness.json ✓ valid" || echo "harness.json ✗ invalid JSON"; } || echo "harness.json — absent"
for p in .claude/commands/roster-run.md .agents/skills/roster-run/SKILL.md; do [ -f "$p" ] && echo "pipeline skills ✓ ($p)"; done
[ -f scripts/sync-harness.sh ] && bash scripts/sync-harness.sh --check 2>&1 | tail -1
[ -f scripts/check-recruiter-sync.js ] && node scripts/check-recruiter-sync.js 2>&1 | tail -1
Report each as ✓ / ✗ / absent. gh absent is a warning (only /roster-ship PR creation needs it), not a failure.
if [ -d workflows/templates ]; then
for f in workflows/templates/*.cwr.json; do
[ -f "$f" ] && { jq empty "$f" 2>/dev/null && echo "$(basename $f) ✓" || echo "$(basename $f) ✗ invalid JSON"; }
done
else
echo "workflows/templates/: absent ✗ (workflow dispatch unavailable)"
fi
if ls workflows/*.cwr.json 2>/dev/null | grep -v '/templates/' | grep -q .; then
grep -q 'workflows/\*\.cwr\.json' .gitignore || \
echo "⚠ WARN: workflow instances present but not gitignored — add 'workflows/*.cwr.json' to .gitignore (and '!workflows/templates/*.cwr.json' to preserve templates)"
fi
Capability tag check (formal skills).
Scan pipeline skills for a mismatch between description content and the presence of a capability: frontmatter field. A skill that mentions formal tools but omits the tag will be invisible to roster-formal-verify's tool-resolution grep:
for f in skills/pipeline/*.md; do
skill_name=$(grep -m1 "^name:" "$f" 2>/dev/null | sed 's/^name: *//')
case "$skill_name" in roster-*) continue ;; esac
if grep -qi "^description:.*\(formal\|rocq\|coq\|quint\)" "$f"; then
if ! grep -q "^capability:" "$f"; then
echo "⚠ WARN: $f ($skill_name) — description mentions formal tools but lacks 'capability:' field"
fi
fi
done
Report each match as a warning, not a failure. The fix is to add capability: formal-rocq or capability: formal-quint to the skill's frontmatter. If formal-apparatus was installed without this tag, patch it before running roster-formal-verify.
2. Project dev-env readiness
Detect the gate commands. Prefer explicit harness tunables when present, else infer from
project signals (mirror of the post-edit-lint hook's detection):
jq -r '.. | objects | (.test_command // .build_command // .lint_command // empty)' .harness/harness.json 2>/dev/null
ls package.json Cargo.toml dune-project pyproject.toml go.mod 2>/dev/null
| Signal | build | test | lint / format | underlying tool(s) |
|---|
package.json | npm run build if script present | npm test if script present | eslint/biome if configured | node, npm |
Cargo.toml | cargo build | cargo test | cargo fmt --check, cargo clippy | cargo |
dune-project | dune build | dune test | dune fmt (.ocamlformat) | dune, opam |
pyproject.toml | — | pytest | ruff/flake8 if configured | python, pytest, ruff |
go.mod | go build ./... | go test ./... | golangci-lint if .golangci.yml | go |
Verify, cheapest signal first — do not run the full suite blindly:
- Tool presence:
command -v <tool> for every underlying tool the detected gates need.
A missing tool is the most common and most actionable failure.
- Command resolves: confirm the build/test/lint command is defined (e.g. the npm script
exists:
jq -e '.scripts.test' package.json).
- Build runs: attempt the build command (bounded). A clean baseline build is the
strongest readiness signal.
- Tests collect: prefer a non-executing collection where available (
pytest --collect-only,
cargo test --no-run, go test ./... -run x -count=0) over a full run — confirms the test
harness is wired without paying full runtime.
Record, per gate, one of: runnable / tool-missing:<tool> / not-configured / fails:<short reason>.
3. Verdict + escalation
- READY — every detected gate is
runnable (or legitimately absent for the project type).
- NOT-READY — any gate is
tool-missing, not-configured, or fails.
On NOT-READY, present exactly what is missing with concrete remediation, then ask
(via the interactive question tool) before changing anything:
Dev environment is NOT READY to start the pipeline:
✗ tests: pytest not installed
✗ lint: ruff configured in pyproject.toml but not installed
Fix options:
A) Install the missing tools now (I'll run: pip install pytest ruff)
B) I'll configure it myself — re-run /roster-doctor when done
C) Proceed anyway (NOT recommended — the pipeline will fail at the quality gate)
Only install/configure on explicit approval (option A). Never install global packages or
modify environment config without consent — this is an escalation trigger.
In preflight mode, return the single-line verdict to the caller and do not print the full
report: READY or NOT-READY: <comma-separated reasons>.
4. Pipeline status (status mode only)
Render the durable, append-only state ledger each pipeline phase writes (see the preamble's
Pipeline State section). This is read-only — it never writes or repairs the ledger.
Select the ledger(s). If a task was named, target only its ledger; otherwise list all:
if [ -n "<task>" ]; then
[ -f "briefs/<task>-state.json" ] && echo "briefs/<task>-state.json" \
|| echo "no ledger for <task> — it has not started, or predates state tracking (inspect briefs/<task>-* directly)"
else
ls briefs/*-state.json 2>/dev/null || echo "no pipeline state recorded"
fi
For each selected ledger, print the timeline in recorded (append) order — the order phases
actually completed, which for a re-run after a NO-GO is e.g. implement, review, implement, review and is itself informative:
Validate each ledger against the byte-identical schema gate roster-run's Step 1.4 uses (not
just a JSON parse), so status flags exactly the ledgers a resume would reject — a
valid-JSON-but-malformed ledger (empty events, bad mode, slug/current_phase mismatch,
current_phase not in the mode's sequence, or an illegal last-event outcome) is a finding, not a
clean render. The expected slug is the file's own basename (briefs/<slug>-state.json):
LEDGER_SCHEMA='
{express:["implement","review","ship"],
fast:["implement","review","qa","ship"],
full:["question","research","intake","spec","plan","implement","review","qa","ship"]} as $seq
| {intake:["VALIDATED"],spec:["VALIDATED","SKIPPED","BOUNCED"],
review:["GO","NO-GO"],qa:["GO","NO-GO"],ship:["COMPLETED","BLOCKED"],
question:["COMPLETED"],research:["COMPLETED"],plan:["COMPLETED"],implement:["COMPLETED","PARTIAL"]} as $vocab
| .current_phase as $cp | .mode as $m | (.events[-1]) as $last
| (.task == $t)
and ($seq[$m] != null)
and ($cp|type=="string")
and (.events|type=="array") and ((.events|length)>0)
and (all(.events[]; . as $e
| ($e|type)=="object"
and ($e.phase|type=="string")
and (($vocab[$e.phase] // []) | index($e.outcome) != null)
and (($e|has("reason")|not) or ($e.reason|type=="string"))))
and ($last.phase == $cp)
and (($seq[$m]|index($cp)) != null)
'
for f in <selected ledgers>; do
slug="${f#briefs/}"; slug="${slug%-state.json}"
if jq -e --arg t "$slug" "$LEDGER_SCHEMA" "$f" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
jq -r '
"Task: \(.task) [\(.mode) mode] — last completed: \(.current_phase)",
(.events[] | " \(.phase): \(.outcome)\(if .at then " (\(.at))" else "" end)\(if .by then " ·\(.by)" else "" end)")
' "$f"
else
echo " ⚠ $f is invalid JSON or fails the ledger schema — corrupt; report it, do not rewrite it. Skipping next-phase computation."
fi
done
Compute the next phase (below) only for ledgers that passed the schema gate.
Then state the next phase roster-run would resume into, computed from current_phase in
the recorded mode's sequence (express: implement→review→ship; fast: implement→review→qa→ship;
full: question→research→intake→spec→plan→implement→review→qa→ship):
- If
current_phase is the last in its mode's sequence (ship), print next: complete when
the latest ship outcome is COMPLETED; if it is BLOCKED, print next: halted (ship BLOCKED) plus the event's reason if present.
- If
current_phase is an outcome-bearing phase (intake/spec/review/qa), note that the
actual route is verdict-dependent (read the brief's VALIDATED/SKIPPED/BOUNCED or GO/NO-GO) —
don't assert a positional successor.
- If
current_phase is implement with latest outcome PARTIAL, print next: implement (re-run — PARTIAL); with COMPLETED, print the positional successor as usual.
- Otherwise print the positional successor in that mode's sequence.
A malformed ledger is reported as a finding (above) — never crash, never rewrite it; a corrupt
ledger is something the human resolves.
Output Contract
A health report (full mode), a one-line READY / NOT-READY: … verdict (preflight mode), or a
per-task pipeline timeline + next-phase line (status mode).
No source files modified — including the state ledger, which is read-only here.
Tool installation happens only after explicit human approval.
When to Go Back
| Condition | Action |
|---|
NOT-READY and user declines to fix | Stop — do not proceed into the pipeline; report blocked |
| Roster install health shows projection drift | Point the user at ./scripts/sync-harness.sh; do not auto-sync from here |
| Detected gate commands are ambiguous (multiple toolchains) | Ask the user which is authoritative before verdict |
What Next
From full mode: report only — the human decides next action.
From preflight (READY): roster-run continues routing.
From preflight (NOT-READY): roster-run halts at the gate until resolved.
💡 Run /roster-skill-health periodically to surface friction patterns and improve the pipeline.
Friction Log
{
"date": "<ISO-8601>",
"skill": "roster-doctor",
"task": "<task-slug>",
"frictions": [],
"methods": [],
"suggestion_type": null,
"suggestion": null,
"effort_estimate": null
}
Rules
- Never modify source code — this skill only reports and (with consent) installs tooling.
- Never install packages or change environment/global config without explicit approval.
- Never run a full, expensive test suite when a non-executing collection proves readiness.
- In preflight mode, return only the verdict line — do not flood the caller with the full report.
- A missing
gh is a warning, never a readiness failure.