sentrux-boundaries

name	sentrux-boundaries
description	Check `.sentrux/rules.toml` for layer and boundary violations and suggest fixes. Use when the user asks "does this respect the architecture?", "any rule violations?", "check boundaries", or "are we following the layering?". Reads the `reason` field on each violation to tailor the fix suggestion.

Sentrux Boundaries

Validates architectural rules defined in .sentrux/rules.toml via the plugin:sentrux:sentrux MCP server.

Steps

1. Call mcp__plugin_sentrux_sentrux__scan on the repo root if the index isn't fresh.
2. Call mcp__plugin_sentrux_sentrux__check_rules.
3. For each violation:
   • Classify as [[boundaries]] violation (has a reason string from the TOML) or layer_direction drift (implicit, from the layer ordering).
   • For a handful of representative violations (no more than 5, highest-signal first), read the offending file and 20 lines of context around the import statement.
   • Suggest a fix:
     • Context → core interpreter/runtime (acyclicity + tree-shakability): offer to move the referenced helper inline into packages/context/src/ or duplicate a narrow utility to avoid pulling the larger module.
     • Sibling-package imports (e.g. eval → code-agent): offer to move the shared code into @noetic-tools/core or refactor the caller to not need it.
     • Layer_direction drift within cli/: offer to invert the dependency (e.g. extract the shared type into cli-foundations) or accept the drift and adjust specs/22-cli-architecture.md if the intent has changed.
4. Group the report by reason field so the user sees the architectural theme, not just file pairs.

Guidance

• Do not auto-fix without asking. List the suggestions and let the user pick.
• If check_rules returns zero violations, say so in one line. Don't invent issues.
• Cross-reference specs/00-overview.md and specs/22-cli-architecture.md when explaining why a rule exists — the spec is the primary source of intent, rules.toml just enforces it.
• Boundaries with context layers must be tree-shakable in their reason are the highest-priority; flag those at the top of the report.