axiom-cloud-sync

name	axiom-cloud-sync
description	Use when choosing between CloudKit vs iCloud Drive, implementing reliable sync, handling offline-first patterns, or designing sync architecture - prevents common sync mistakes that cause data loss
license	MIT
compatibility	iOS 10+, macOS 10.12+
metadata	{"version":"1.0.0","last-updated":"2025-12-25"}

Cloud Sync

Overview

Core principle: Choose the right sync technology for the data shape, then implement offline-first patterns that handle network failures gracefully.

Two fundamentally different sync approaches:

• CloudKit — Structured data (records with fields and relationships)
• iCloud Drive — File-based data (documents, images, any file format)

Quick Decision Tree

What needs syncing?

├─ Structured data (records, relationships)?
│  ├─ Using SwiftData? → SwiftData + CloudKit (easiest, iOS 17+)
│  ├─ Need shared/public database? → CKSyncEngine or raw CloudKit
│  └─ Custom persistence (GRDB, SQLite)? → CKSyncEngine (iOS 17+)
│
├─ Documents/files users expect in Files app?
│  └─ iCloud Drive (UIDocument or FileManager)
│
├─ Large binary blobs (images, videos)?
│  ├─ Associated with structured data? → CKAsset in CloudKit
│  └─ Standalone files? → iCloud Drive
│
└─ App settings/preferences?
   └─ NSUbiquitousKeyValueStore (simple key-value, 1MB limit)

CloudKit vs iCloud Drive

Aspect	CloudKit	iCloud Drive
Data shape	Structured records	Files/documents
Query support	Full query language	Filename only
Relationships	Native support	None (manual)
Conflict resolution	Record-level	File-level
User visibility	Hidden from user	Visible in Files app
Sharing	Record/database sharing	File sharing
Offline	Local cache required	Automatic download

Red Flags

If ANY of these appear, STOP and reconsider:

• ❌ "Store JSON files in CloudKit" — Wrong tool. Use iCloud Drive for files
• ❌ "Build relationships manually in iCloud Drive" — Wrong tool. Use CloudKit
• ❌ "Assume sync is instant" — Network fails. Design offline-first
• ❌ "Skip conflict handling" — Conflicts WILL happen on multiple devices
• ❌ "Use CloudKit for user documents" — Users can't see them. Use iCloud Drive
• ❌ "Sync on app launch only" — Users expect continuous sync

Offline-First Pattern

MANDATORY: All sync code must work offline first.

// ✅ CORRECT: Offline-first architecture
class OfflineFirstSync {
    private let localStore: LocalDatabase  // GRDB, SwiftData, Core Data
    private let syncEngine: CKSyncEngine

    // Write to LOCAL first, sync to cloud in background
    func save(_ item: Item) async throws {
        // 1. Save locally (instant)
        try await localStore.save(item)

        // 2. Queue for sync (non-blocking)
        syncEngine.state.add(pendingRecordZoneChanges: [
            .saveRecord(item.recordID)
        ])
    }

    // Read from LOCAL (instant)
    func fetch() async throws -> [Item] {
        return try await localStore.fetchAll()
    }
}

// ❌ WRONG: Cloud-first (blocks on network)
func save(_ item: Item) async throws {
    // Fails when offline, slow on bad network
    try await cloudKit.save(item)
    try await localStore.save(item)
}

Conflict Resolution Strategies

Conflicts occur when two devices edit the same data before syncing.

Strategy 1: Last-Writer-Wins (Simplest)

// Server always has latest, client accepts it
func resolveConflict(local: CKRecord, server: CKRecord) -> CKRecord {
    return server  // Accept server version
}

Use when: Data is non-critical, user won't notice overwrites

Strategy 2: Merge (Most Common)

// Combine changes from both versions
func resolveConflict(local: CKRecord, server: CKRecord) -> CKRecord {
    let merged = server.copy() as! CKRecord

    // For each field, apply custom merge logic
    merged["notes"] = mergeText(
        local["notes"] as? String,
        server["notes"] as? String
    )
    merged["tags"] = mergeSets(
        local["tags"] as? [String] ?? [],
        server["tags"] as? [String] ?? []
    )

    return merged
}

Use when: Both versions contain valuable changes

Strategy 3: User Choice

// Present conflict to user
func resolveConflict(local: CKRecord, server: CKRecord) async -> CKRecord {
    let choice = await presentConflictUI(local: local, server: server)
    return choice == .keepLocal ? local : server
}

Use when: Data is critical, user must decide

Common Patterns

Pattern 1: SwiftData + CloudKit (Recommended for New Apps)

import SwiftData

// Automatic CloudKit sync with zero configuration
@Model
class Note {
    var title: String
    var content: String
    var createdAt: Date

    init(title: String, content: String) {
        self.title = title
        self.content = content
        self.createdAt = Date()
    }
}

// Container automatically syncs if CloudKit entitlement present
let container = try ModelContainer(for: Note.self)

Limitations:

• Private database only (no public/shared)
• Automatic sync (less control over timing)
• No custom conflict resolution

Pattern 2: CKSyncEngine (Custom Persistence)

// For GRDB, SQLite, or custom databases
class MySyncManager: CKSyncEngineDelegate {
    private let engine: CKSyncEngine
    private let database: GRDBDatabase

    func handleEvent(_ event: CKSyncEngine.Event) async {
        switch event {
        case .stateUpdate(let update):
            // Persist sync state
            await saveSyncState(update.stateSerialization)

        case .fetchedDatabaseChanges(let changes):
            // Apply changes to local DB
            for zone in changes.modifications {
                await handleZoneChanges(zone)
            }

        case .sentRecordZoneChanges(let sent):
            // Mark records as synced
            for saved in sent.savedRecords {
                await markSynced(saved.recordID)
            }
        }
    }
}

See axiom-cloudkit-ref for complete CKSyncEngine setup.

Pattern 3: iCloud Drive Documents

import UIKit

class MyDocument: UIDocument {
    var content: Data?

    override func contents(forType typeName: String) throws -> Any {
        return content ?? Data()
    }

    override func load(fromContents contents: Any, ofType typeName: String?) throws {
        content = contents as? Data
    }
}

// Save to iCloud Drive (visible in Files app)
let url = FileManager.default.url(forUbiquityContainerIdentifier: nil)?
    .appendingPathComponent("Documents")
    .appendingPathComponent("MyFile.txt")

let doc = MyDocument(fileURL: url!)
doc.content = "Hello".data(using: .utf8)
doc.save(to: url!, for: .forCreating)

See axiom-icloud-drive-ref for NSFileCoordinator and conflict handling.

Anti-Patterns

1. Ignoring Sync State

// ❌ WRONG: No awareness of pending changes
var items: [Item] = []  // Are these synced? Pending? Conflicted?

// ✅ CORRECT: Track sync state
struct SyncableItem {
    let item: Item
    let syncState: SyncState  // .synced, .pending, .conflict
}

2. Blocking UI on Sync

// ❌ WRONG: UI blocks until sync completes
func viewDidLoad() async {
    items = try await cloudKit.fetchAll()  // Spinner forever on airplane
    tableView.reloadData()
}

// ✅ CORRECT: Show local data immediately
func viewDidLoad() {
    items = localStore.fetchAll()  // Instant
    tableView.reloadData()

    Task {
        await syncEngine.fetchChanges()  // Background update
    }
}

3. No Retry Logic

// ❌ WRONG: Single attempt
try await cloudKit.save(record)

// ✅ CORRECT: Exponential backoff
func saveWithRetry(_ record: CKRecord, attempts: Int = 3) async throws {
    for attempt in 0..<attempts {
        do {
            try await cloudKit.save(record)
            return
        } catch let error as CKError where error.isRetryable {
            let delay = pow(2.0, Double(attempt))
            try await Task.sleep(for: .seconds(delay))
        }
    }
    throw SyncError.maxRetriesExceeded
}

Sync State Indicators

Always show users the sync state:

enum SyncState {
    case synced       // ✓ (checkmark)
    case pending      // ↻ (arrows)
    case conflict     // ⚠ (warning)
    case offline      // ☁ with X
}

// In SwiftUI
HStack {
    Text(item.title)
    Spacer()
    SyncIndicator(state: item.syncState)
}

Entitlement Checklist

Before sync will work:

1. Xcode → Signing & Capabilities

   • ✓ iCloud capability added
   • ✓ CloudKit checked (for CloudKit)
   • ✓ iCloud Documents checked (for iCloud Drive)
   • ✓ Container selected/created

2. Apple Developer Portal

   • ✓ App ID has iCloud capability
   • ✓ CloudKit container exists (for CloudKit)

3. Device

   • ✓ Signed into iCloud
   • ✓ iCloud Drive enabled (Settings → [Name] → iCloud)

Large Dataset Sync

When syncing 10,000+ records, naive approaches cause timeouts and launch slowdowns.

Initial Sync Strategy

// ❌ WRONG: Fetch everything at once
let allRecords = try await database.fetchAll()
syncEngine.state.add(pendingRecordZoneChanges: allRecords.map { .saveRecord($0.recordID) })

// ✅ CORRECT: Batch initial sync
func performInitialSync(batchSize: Int = 200) async throws {
    var cursor: CKQueryOperation.Cursor? = nil

    repeat {
        let (results, nextCursor) = try await database.records(
            matching: query,
            resultsLimit: batchSize,
            desiredKeys: nil,
            continuationCursor: cursor
        )
        // Process batch
        try await localStore.saveBatch(results.compactMap { try? $0.1.get() })
        cursor = nextCursor
    } while cursor != nil
}

Incremental Sync (After Initial)

CKSyncEngine handles incremental sync automatically — it fetches only changes since the last sync token. Ensure you persist stateSerialization so the engine doesn't re-fetch everything on next launch.

Performance Guidelines

Dataset Size	Strategy	Notes
< 1,000 records	Default CKSyncEngine	Works out of the box
1,000–10,000	Batch initial sync	200-record batches, show progress UI
10,000+	Pagination + background	Use BGProcessingTask for initial sync
100,000+	Server-side filtering	Only sync what user needs, lazy-load rest

Key insight: Initial sync is the bottleneck. After initial sync, CKSyncEngine's incremental approach handles large datasets efficiently because it only fetches deltas.

Pressure Scenarios

Scenario 1: "Just skip conflict handling for v1"

Situation: Deadline pressure to ship without conflict resolution.

Risk: Users WILL edit on multiple devices. Data WILL be lost silently.

Response: "Minimum viable conflict handling takes 2 hours. Silent data loss costs users and generates 1-star reviews."

Scenario 2: "Sync on app launch is enough"

Situation: Avoiding continuous sync complexity.

Risk: Users expect changes to appear within seconds, not on next launch.

Response: Use CKSyncEngine or SwiftData which handle continuous sync automatically.

Related Skills

• axiom-cloudkit-ref — Complete CloudKit API reference
• axiom-icloud-drive-ref — File-based sync with NSFileCoordinator
• axiom-cloud-sync-diag — Debugging sync failures
• axiom-storage — Choosing where to store data locally