| name | market-research-reports |
| description | Generate comprehensive market research and analysis reports. Use when: analyzing grant funding landscapes, market sizing exercises, competitive analysis of funding sources, strategic planning for grant applications, creating investment or business case documentation. |
Market Research Reports
Overview
Generate comprehensive market research and analysis reports for strategic decision-making. This skill applies professional analysis frameworks to understand funding landscapes, competitive dynamics, and market opportunities relevant to grant seeking and research planning.
When to Use
- Analyzing funding agency landscapes and trends
- Conducting market sizing for research domains
- Evaluating competitive positioning among institutions
- Creating business cases for new initiatives
- Developing strategic plans based on market data
- Supporting grant applications with market context
- Analyzing industry trends for translational research
Core Frameworks
1. TAM/SAM/SOM Analysis
For sizing research funding markets:
## Market Size Analysis
### Total Addressable Market (TAM)
Total funding available in the domain
- Federal agency budgets (NSF, NIH, DOE, etc.)
- Foundation giving in the area
- Industry R&D spending
### Serviceable Addressable Market (SAM)
Funding accessible to your institution type
- Geographic restrictions
- Eligibility requirements
- Program-specific limitations
### Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM)
Realistic capture based on:
- Historical success rates
- Institutional capacity
- Competitive positioning
2. Porter's Five Forces (Funding Landscape)
| Force | Application to Grants |
|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Number of applicants, success rates |
| Threat of New Entrants | New institutions, emerging PIs |
| Bargaining Power of Funders | Agency priorities, budget constraints |
| Bargaining Power of Applicants | Unique capabilities, track record |
| Threat of Substitutes | Alternative funding sources |
3. PESTLE Analysis
Analyze external factors affecting funding:
## PESTLE Analysis: [Research Domain]
### Political
- Administration priorities
- Congressional appropriations
- Agency leadership changes
### Economic
- Federal budget trends
- Foundation endowment performance
- Industry R&D cycles
### Social
- Public health priorities
- Workforce development needs
- Diversity and inclusion focus
### Technological
- Emerging research areas
- Infrastructure investments
- Technology transfer trends
### Legal
- IP policies
- Data sharing requirements
- Compliance regulations
### Environmental
- Climate research priorities
- Sustainability mandates
- Environmental justice focus
4. SWOT Analysis
## SWOT Analysis: [Institution/Program]
### Strengths
- Unique capabilities
- Infrastructure advantages
- Track record
### Weaknesses
- Capacity limitations
- Gaps in expertise
- Resource constraints
### Opportunities
- Emerging funding programs
- Policy tailwinds
- Partnership possibilities
### Threats
- Budget cuts
- Competition increases
- Shifting priorities
Report Structure
Executive Summary (1-2 pages)
## Executive Summary
### Key Findings
1. [Major finding with quantification]
2. [Second finding]
3. [Third finding]
### Strategic Implications
- [Implication for strategy]
- [Action recommendation]
### Market Snapshot
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Total Market Size | $X billion |
| YoY Growth | X% |
| Top Agencies | NSF, NIH, DOE |
| Success Rate | X% |
Market Overview (2-3 pages)
- Definition and scope
- Key stakeholders
- Value chain analysis
- Historical context
Market Size & Growth (3-4 pages)
- TAM/SAM/SOM analysis
- Historical growth trends
- Forward projections
- Regional/segment breakdown
Competitive Landscape (3-4 pages)
- Porter's Five Forces
- Top competitors/institutions
- Market share analysis
- Positioning matrix
Trend Analysis (2-3 pages)
- PESTLE factors
- Emerging technologies
- Policy shifts
- Future outlook
Strategic Recommendations (1-2 pages)
- Prioritized opportunities
- Risk mitigation strategies
- Implementation roadmap
Data Sources
Federal Funding Data
## Data Sources
### Primary Sources
- USASpending.gov (obligations data)
- Grants.gov (opportunities)
- NIH RePORTER (awarded grants)
- NSF Award Search
### Agency Budgets
- Congressional appropriations
- Agency strategic plans
- Budget justifications
### Industry Data
- NSF S&E indicators
- USPTO patent data
- Industry association reports
Data Collection Commands
import requests
def get_nsf_budget_data(fiscal_year):
"""Fetch NSF budget by directorate."""
url = f"https://www.nsf.gov/about/budget/fy{fiscal_year}/pdf/fy{fiscal_year}budget.pdf"
pass
def search_nih_grants(keywords, fiscal_year):
"""Search NIH funded grants."""
endpoint = "https://api.reporter.nih.gov/v2/projects/search"
payload = {
"criteria": {
"fiscal_years": [fiscal_year],
"advanced_text_search": {
"search_text": keywords
}
}
}
response = requests.post(endpoint, json=payload)
return response.json()
Visualization Templates
Market Growth Chart
Year | Funding ($B)
--------|-------------
2020 | ████████░░ $8.0
2021 | █████████░ $9.2
2022 | ██████████ $10.5
2023 | ███████████ $11.8
2024 | ████████████ $13.2 (projected)
CAGR: 12.5%
Competitive Positioning Matrix
High Success Rate
▲
│
Leader │ Challenger
(NIH R01) │ (New Programs)
──────────────────────┼──────────────────────►
Large Pool │ Small Pool
│
Niche │ Developing
(Specialized) │ (Emerging)
│
Low Success Rate
Funding Allocation Pie Chart
NSF Budget FY2024 ($9.5B)
Research & Related ████████████░░░░░░░░ 58%
Education & HR ████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 12%
Major Equipment ███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 8%
Agency Operations ██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 6%
Other ████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 16%
Integration with Grant System
Use this skill with scraped grant data to:
- Trend identification: Analyze aggregated grants for funding patterns
- Success rate calculation: Compare funded vs. total applications
- Keyword analysis: Identify hot research areas from funded grants
- Agency comparison: Compare funding levels across sources
- Timeline planning: Align proposals with funding cycles
Anti-patterns
| Mistake | Solution |
|---|
| Unsourced claims | Cite all data with dates |
| Stale data | Use most recent available |
| Single source | Cross-reference multiple sources |
| Vague projections | State assumptions explicitly |
| Missing context | Explain methodology limitations |