| name | control-preflight-reflect |
| description | Before each experiment, analyze latest route/STA evidence, reflect on method gaps, and output concrete improvement hypotheses and next-step A/B plan. Use when user asks to start new experiments or when model/flow conclusions may be unstable. |
Control Preflight Reflect
Run this skill before submitting new experiment batches.
Background Knowledge Links
This skill should stay linked to:
- the current route-policy and comparison-policy KB context,
- local paper-derived or primary-source notes when assumptions about routing behavior may drift,
- experiment-experience artifacts from
eda-experiment-phenomenology-analyst when similar branches were already attempted,
eda-context-accessor when current KB or paper context is missing from the preflight brief.
If the latest evidence contradicts background knowledge, surface that contradiction directly in the reflection artifact and trigger KB feedback rather than hiding it inside a generic root cause label.
Mandatory outputs
preflight_reflection_*.md
- selected next-step plan (A/B/C)
- explicit go/no-go for new experiment submission
Operational References
- Load
references/evidence-lock.md when collecting required artifacts and deciding whether the run is in insufficient_evidence state.
- Load
references/checklist.md when scoring the explicit preflight checks and producing pass or fail per item.
- Load
references/reflection-artifact.md when writing the root-cause ranking, A/B/C plan, and acceptance criteria.
- Load
references/model-gap-patterns.md when deciding whether simple min(front,back) logic should be vetoed in favor of a judgment model path.