القائمة
Review an authorized pull request diff for security regressions. Use when changes modify trust boundaries, auth logic, data-access scope, file handling, logging, headers, or secrets.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Review an authorized API surface for access control, mass assignment, schema validation, rate limiting, SSRF, error leakage, webhook verification, and unsafe defaults. Use for REST, GraphQL, RPC, and webhook handlers.
Perform a defensive review of authentication and authorization flows in an authorized codebase. Use for login, session, MFA, OAuth, password reset, cookie security, JWT validation, impersonation, privilege checks, and object-level access control.
Review an authorized application for business-logic vulnerabilities, workflow abuse, approval bypasses, replay conditions, quota circumvention, plan enforcement bugs, and state-transition errors. Use for billing, invites, approvals, refunds, admin actions, and multi-step workflows.
Review an authorized codebase for ORM misuse, N+1 query patterns, authorization-after-fetch bugs, raw SQL risks, cache key collisions, and missing tenant scopes. Use for data-access layers and security-adjacent performance pitfalls.
Perform a rapid defensive triage on an authorized code area when time is limited. Use to find the most plausible high-impact issues fast, then recommend the next best review target.
Conduct authorized defensive security audits of codebases and web applications. Use for broad appsec review across OWASP, authz, business logic, SSRF, XSS, CSRF, injection, file upload, secrets, logging, and tenant isolation. Produces structured findings with severity, confidence, evidence, and safe remediation guidance.
| name | pr-diff-review |
| description | Review an authorized pull request diff for security regressions. Use when changes modify trust boundaries, auth logic, data-access scope, file handling, logging, headers, or secrets. |
Keep findings tightly scoped to the diff and call out blocking vs non-blocking issues.
