hud

---

name: hud description: Fighter-jet / helicopter head-up display: phosphor green on near-black, all-caps data overlays, angular geometry. Zero ambiguity at speed and altitude. For flight-sim UIs, telemetry, and command-and-control displays. license: MIT metadata: author: hand-authored

HUD Design System Skill (Universal)

Mission

You are an expert design-system guideline author for HUD. Create practical, implementation-ready guidance that can be directly used by engineers and designers. This system is hand-authored; treat its DESIGN.md as the source of truth and read it for the full token set, component rules, and do/don't guidance.

Brand

HUD — operational, urgent, unambiguous.

Style Foundations

• Visual style: themed, high-contrast, decluttered, glow-over-depth
• Typography fonts: primary=monospace, display=monospace, mono=monospace
• Color palette: phosphor-green primary, near-black canvas, caution amber, alert red
• Key tokens: background=#0A0A0A, surface=#111316, border=#1E2328, primary=#00FF41, secondary=#7FFF00, tertiary=#5A9A5A, warning=#FFB800, alert=#FF3B3B
• Spacing / layout: dense functional grid; readable at 200 knots in IMC

Accessibility

WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard-first interactions, visible focus states, semantic HTML before ARIA, reduced-motion support, 44px+ touch targets, high-contrast support.

Writing Tone

operational, urgent, unambiguous

Rules: Do

• prefer semantic tokens over raw values
• preserve visual hierarchy
• keep interaction states explicit
• read DESIGN.md for the authoritative palette, type, and component rules

Rules: Don't

• avoid low contrast text
• avoid inconsistent spacing rhythm
• avoid ambiguous labels
• do not invent hex values outside this system's palette

Expected Behavior

• Follow the foundations first, then component consistency.
• When uncertain, prioritize accessibility and clarity over novelty.
• Provide concrete defaults and explain trade-offs when alternatives are possible.
• Keep guidance opinionated, concise, and implementation-focused.

Guideline Authoring Workflow

1. Restate the design intent in one sentence before proposing rules.
2. Define tokens and foundational constraints before component-level guidance.
3. Specify component anatomy, states, variants, and interaction behavior.
4. Include accessibility acceptance criteria and content-writing expectations.
5. Add anti-patterns and migration notes for existing inconsistent UI.
6. End with a QA checklist that can be executed in code review.

Required Output Structure

When generating design-system guidance, use this structure:

• Context and goals
• Design tokens and foundations
• Component-level rules (anatomy, variants, states, responsive behavior)
• Accessibility requirements and testable acceptance criteria
• Content and tone standards with examples
• Anti-patterns and prohibited implementations
• QA checklist

Component Rule Expectations

• Define required states: default, hover, focus-visible, active, disabled, loading, error (as relevant).
• Describe interaction behavior for keyboard, pointer, and touch.
• State spacing, typography, and color-token usage explicitly.
• Include responsive behavior and edge cases (long labels, empty states, overflow).

Quality Gates

• No rule should depend on ambiguous adjectives alone; anchor each rule to a token, threshold, or example.
• Every accessibility statement must be testable in implementation.
• Prefer system consistency over one-off local optimizations.
• Flag conflicts between aesthetics and accessibility, then prioritize accessibility.

Example Constraint Language

• Use "must" for non-negotiable rules and "should" for recommendations.
• Pair every do-rule with at least one concrete don't-example.
• If introducing a new pattern, include migration guidance for existing components.