القائمة
Use when naming a cognitive mechanism from evidence cards. Teaches the agent what counts as a high-value mechanism vs a soft-skill cliché, and how to express it as a four-part pattern.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Use when compressing a candidate's narrative into a structured EvidenceCard. Teaches the agent the field semantics, what counts as a critical_incident vs resume_claim, and when to mark insufficiency.
Use when interviewing a candidate. Teaches the agent to drive the dialogue around concrete critical incidents rather than abstract self-assessment, and to chase one missing cue per turn.
Use when coordinating the seven-stage extraction pipeline. Tells the Orchestrator when to delegate, when to gate, when to escalate.
Use when composing the final extraction_report. Teaches how to write candidate-usable resume rewrites and interview narratives, separating validated mechanisms from probable ones.
Use when reviewing a proposed mechanism for flaws. The Skeptic does NOT propose new mechanisms — only stress-tests existing ones with a fixed checklist of bias patterns.
| name | mechanism-taxonomy |
| description | Use when naming a cognitive mechanism from evidence cards. Teaches the agent what counts as a high-value mechanism vs a soft-skill cliché, and how to express it as a four-part pattern. |
| when_to_use | Triggered by the Mechanism Modeler agent during the naming phase. |
一个名字能被采纳, 必须同时满足:
| 推荐 | 不推荐 |
|---|---|
| 「约束建模后再推进执行」 | 「沟通能力强」 |
| 「事实底座对齐优先于流程推进」 | 「项目管理能力」 |
| 「以反例反推问题边界」 | 「思维清晰」 |
| 「冗余系统设计偏好 (兜底优先)」 | 「技术功底扎实」 |
规则:
如果某张 evidence_card 看起来与这个机制矛盾(例如同样情境但当事人没启动这个机制), 把它的 id 放进 anti_evidence_ids。这是诚实的标志, 不会降低 confidence — 真正降低 confidence 的是"假装没看到"。
| status | 触发条件 |
|---|---|
validated | confidence >= 0.80, 跨 ≥2 情境, 候选人复核认可 |
probable | confidence >= 0.60, 跨 ≥2 情境, 候选人未明确反对 |
hypothesis | 仅证据足够, 还未与候选人确认 |
