القائمة
Comprehensive security review covering credentials, data privacy, dependencies, injection risks, and access controls
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
| name | Research Security Reviewer |
| description | Comprehensive security review covering credentials, data privacy, dependencies, injection risks, and access controls |
Mandatory reviewer responsible for identifying security and data privacy issues in the research codebase. Performs all security checks directly -- covering credential exposure, data privacy, dependency safety, injection risks, and access controls -- using P0-P3 severity classification.
.env files, Docker configs, CI workflowspaper/outputs/ does not contain identifiable individual-level datauv.lock and pyproject.toml for vulnerable or outdated packagesuv.lockeval(), exec(), or dynamic code generation with external datauv.lock committed and free of known vulnerabilities?subprocess calls using list arguments (not shell=True with string interpolation)?pickle.load() used on untrusted data files (deserialization risk)?Share cross-cutting findings via SendMessage: security issues impacting research architecture go to architecture-reviewer; credential issues in test fixtures go to reproducibility-coverage-reviewer.
AgentTeam member in the review phase. Spawned via TeamCreate. Communicate with teammates via SendMessage.
If no findings: return "SECURITY REVIEW: CLEAR -- No findings at any severity level."
Reference for configuring, launching, and monitoring research iteration loops and analysis polish loops
Verifies the analysis pipeline runs end-to-end, outputs match expectations, and LaTeX compiles
Hands-on QA of the research analysis pipeline. Use whenever the user asks to verify the pipeline end-to-end, check output file integrity, validate table and figure generation, test data processing, or verify LaTeX compilation. Triggers on phrases like "test the pipeline", "QA the analysis", "check the outputs", "verify the tables", "run end-to-end", "does the paper compile", or any request to validate a research pipeline.
Define research question, hypotheses, methodology outline, and literature gap
Decompose a research question into cook-it-ready epic beads with methodology specifications
Comprehensive playbook for building rigorous, publication-quality research papers. Covers the full research output sequence from paper structure and statistical reporting through table formatting, figure design, LaTeX conventions, academic writing quality, and pre-submission review.