بنقرة واحدة
plan
Strategic planning — create implementation plan from brainstorm specs. Tasks, dependencies, acceptance criteria.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Strategic planning — create implementation plan from brainstorm specs. Tasks, dependencies, acceptance criteria.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Long-running iterative development loops. Run arbitrarily-long tasks without diluting model attention. Triggers: ralph, ralph loop, iterative loop, long-running task, development loop.
Full compactor reference — tool parameters, anti-patterns, sandbox languages, context budget, workflows.
Diagnostics — validate config, session DB, runtimes, and troubleshoot compactor issues.
Context management — compact session, recall history, run code, search content.
Stats display — context savings, session metrics, compactions, sandbox and recall/search counters.
Helps you use the /unipi:btw side-conversation workflow effectively. Use when you want to think in parallel, ask side questions without interrupting ongoing work, or inject a side thread back into the main agent.
| name | plan |
| description | Strategic planning — create implementation plan from brainstorm specs. Tasks, dependencies, acceptance criteria. |
Turn brainstorm decisions into an actionable implementation plan.
This skill MAY: read specs, read codebase, ask questions, write plan document, update brainstorm checkboxes. This skill MAY NOT: edit code, implement anything, run tests, deploy.
NEVER write code during this skill. This is planning, not implementation.
/unipi:plan specs:<path>(multiple,optional) <string(greedy)>(optional)
specs:<path> — one or more brainstorm specs to plan from (auto-suggested)string(greedy) — optional scope guidance (e.g., "focus on API layer only").unipi/docs/.unipi/docs/ directory.unipi/docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-plan.md
Committed to current branch.
specs: arg provided, read those spec files.unipi/docs/specs/ and ask user to chooseExit: Spec(s) loaded. Understand what to plan.
string(greedy) provided: use it to scope planning (e.g., "focus on auth only")"Where should this work happen?"
- Main branch — work directly on main (small/medium tasks, low risk)
- New branch — isolated worktree (larger tasks, risky changes)
If "New branch": "What branch name? (e.g.,
feat/auth, or press enter for auto-naming based on spec topic)"
Record the decision:
workbranch: will be empty in plan frontmatterworkbranch: {branch-name} in plan frontmatter (auto-generate feat/{topic} if not provided)Exit: No blockers. Branch strategy decided. Ready to plan.
Structure the plan with heart of gold style:
---
title: "{Topic} — Implementation Plan"
type: plan
date: YYYY-MM-DD
workbranch: {branch-name} # empty string = work on main branch
specs:
- path/to/spec.md
---
# {Topic} — Implementation Plan
## Overview
{Brief summary of what this plan covers}
## Tasks
- unstarted: Task 1 — {Task Name}
- Description: {What needs to be done}
- Dependencies: {None, or list of tasks}
- Acceptance Criteria: {How to verify done}
- Steps:
1. {Concrete step}
2. {Concrete step}
- unstarted: Task 2 — {Task Name}
- Description: ...
- Dependencies: ...
- Acceptance Criteria: ...
- Steps: ...
## Sequencing
{Order of execution, dependency graph if complex}
## Risks
{Potential blockers or concerns}
Tasks use prefixes to track progress:
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
unstarted: | Not started |
in-progress: | Being worked on |
completed: | Done and verified |
failed: | Attempted but failed, needs investigation |
awaiting_user: | Needs user action (test, approve, provide input) |
blocked: | Waiting on dependency or external factor |
skipped: | Intentionally not doing (deferred, out of scope) |
After plan is complete:
[x][ ]Example:
## Implementation Checklist
- [x] Set up auth middleware — covered in Task 1
- [x] Create login endpoint — covered in Task 2
- [ ] Add OAuth support — deferred to next plan
- [ ] Rate limiting — out of scope
This creates the link between brainstorm and plan — plan covers some items, others remain for future plans.
Semantics: Spec [x] means "planned" (covered by a plan). It does NOT mean "done". Implementation progress is tracked in the plan file, not the spec.
Self-check before presenting:
/unipi:work sessionDo NOT re-read or re-edit the spec checkboxes — Phase 4 already wrote them.
Present plan summary to user. Then ask what to do next. If ask_user is available, prefer structured handoff options using action: "new_session" so the selected workflow can be queued automatically:
ask_user({
question: "What would you like to do next?",
options: [
{
label: "Proceed to /unipi:work",
description: "Start implementing the plan",
value: "work",
action: "new_session",
prefill: "<work-command>",
},
{
label: "Proceed to /unipi:auto",
description: "Run full pipeline (work → review → merge)",
value: "auto",
action: "new_session",
prefill: "/unipi:auto plan:YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-plan.md",
},
{ label: "Revise plan", description: "Adjust tasks or scope", value: "revise" },
{ label: "Done for now", description: "Return later", value: "done", action: "end_turn" },
],
allowFreeform: false,
})
Use the correct <work-command>:
/unipi:work worktree:<branch-name> specs:YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-plan/unipi:work specs:YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-plan (no worktree arg)Copyable fallback commands when ask_user is unavailable:
/unipi:work worktree:<branch-name> specs:YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-plan
/unipi:work specs:YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-plan
/unipi:auto plan:YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-plan.md
Recommend starting a new session for work if using a worktree; the ask_user launcher handles compact/direct queuing when available.
If user runs /unipi:plan on an existing plan:
completed: tasks