القائمة
Goal-directed review of git history for change coherence. Trigger when: - Analyzing project history, reviewing diffs, or checking commit messages for alignment. - Prompt contains: /git-review, git history, commit log, change coherence.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
SOP for the architect-tier campaign workflow (/campaign): exhaustive survey, mitigation planning, tiered orchestration, and reconciliation. Trigger when: - Running a multi-workstream initiative where an expensive architect-tier council surveys, plans, emits worker prompts, and judges landed work. - Conducting production-readiness assessments that fan out into autonomous mitigation dispatches across model tiers. - Prompt contains: /campaign, campaign workflow, survey, orchestrate, reconcile, premise freshness, tier routing, worker IBC, scratch.
Runnable driver for the deterministic campaign-execution protocol — the automaton that takes a validated campaign DAG to a correctly merged branch. Trigger when: - A campaign has a validated DAG + worker IBCs and the composer (or a cheap-tier runner) must DRIVE dispatch ⇄ reconcile as a loop rather than by hand. - Resuming a partially-executed campaign from its git history + sketch checkpoint after a halt or crash. - Prompt contains: /orchestrate, orchestration, drive the DAG, run the campaign, layer schedule, reconcile-and-merge, resume campaign.
Conditional discipline for projects hosted on a git forge (GitHub, GitLab, Forgejo, …): branch↔PR mapping, self-contained PR prose, review-on-forge, merge consent, and the forge audit. Trigger when: - Opening, updating, reviewing, or merging a pull/merge request. - A campaign's integration branch is ready to surface on a forge. - Auditing forge-side presence at merge-consent or campaign CLOSE. - Prompt contains: /forge, pull request, PR body, merge request, forge discipline, PR review, stacked PR.
Normative sufficiency conditions for Initial Boundary Conditions (IBCs) and the SOP for the cheap-tier boundary refinement loop (/boundary). Trigger when: - Crafting, auditing, or refining a prompt/IBC destined for an expensive (architect-class) model or an autonomous worker dispatch. - Evaluating whether a task frame is sufficient to bound an agent walk. - Prompt contains: /boundary, IBC, initial boundary condition, boundary contract, sufficiency conditions, worker prompt, prompt refinement.
Durable categorized record-keeping for any predicate-enabled walk. Trigger when: - Classifying a step's output for recording (decision, finding, debt, feedback). - Promoting a scratch artifact to the ledger, to repo/docs, or to a category home (.ledger/tech-debt/, .ledger/process-feedback/). - Auditing whether a draft is structurally ready for its destination. - Running a zero-context sensibility read before committing to promotion. - Recording a known limitation as a tech-debt entry (not prose in the log). - Recording a friction, miss, improvement, or process amendment. - Prompt contains: /record, record-keeping, promote, ledger note, zettelkasten, scratch-to-ledger, zero-context read, over-strip, classification trigger, tech-debt, process-feedback, amendment.
Rules, conventions, and constraints for formatting git commit messages and committing at logical boundaries. Trigger when: - Drafting, revising, or validating git commit messages. - Pausing at commit boundaries under the CORE or CONTINUE workflows. - Evaluating whether a changeset should be split into multiple commits. - Prompt contains keywords: commit message, git commit, conventional commits, commit hygiene, commit guidelines, logical boundary, spaghetti diff, atomic commit, commit boundary.
| name | git-review |
| description | Goal-directed review of git history for change coherence. Trigger when: - Analyzing project history, reviewing diffs, or checking commit messages for alignment. - Prompt contains: /git-review, git history, commit log, change coherence. |
A structured approach to reviewing change history with an explicit purpose. Never browse history aimlessly — always state what you're looking for.
Adversarial path anchor. This lens is invoked on the Verification Dual's adversarial path (rules.md §2 Invariant 1): when no deterministic evaluator can close a change-coherence condition, context-free agents using this protocol supply the decorrelated review. See skills/refine/SKILL.md AUDIT §"Sibling Skills Consultation" for the wiring point.
Before reviewing history, declare what you're investigating — state your purpose and scope (commits, timeframe, file path, or keyword).
Examples:
git log --oneline -n 20 # Recent commits
git log --oneline --since="1 week ago" # Time-bounded
git shortlog -sn --since="1 month ago" # By author
git log --grep="keyword" --oneline # Message search
git log --all --oneline -- "path/to/file" # File history
git log -S "function_name" --oneline # Code change search
git show <hash> # Full commit details
git diff <hash>^..<hash> # Diff only
git show <hash> --stat # Changed files summary
When examining a commit, assess:
GIT REVIEW
PURPOSE: [stated purpose]
SCOPE: [what was searched]
COMMITS EXAMINED: N
RELEVANT:
- <hash>: <summary>
Finding: [how it relates to purpose]
CONCERNS:
- <hash>: <summary>
Issue: [problem identified]
CONCLUSION: [what was learned, relative to purpose]
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. [Actionable item]
The active closed-loop execution workflow (/core, /refine) requires ledger updates and JUSTIFICATION blocks at each COMMIT boundary. Well-formed commits should:
Red flags: Commits with "and" in the message, unexplained scope changes, or missing context.
Recovery: If inconsistencies are found, use /core to plan remediation.