reviewer

name	reviewer
description	Use when reviewing active multi-agent work, PRs, or handoffs where you need Cavemem's hivemind tool to map branch and task ownership before reading full session memory.

Reviewer

Use this skill for review-shaped tasks where ownership matters:

• PR review on an active agent branch
• Handoff review
• "who owns this task?"
• conflict triage across worktrees
• stale lane vs live lane checks before touching code

Fast path

1. Call hivemind with the target repo_root (or repo_roots).
2. Pick the smallest relevant session set by exact branch, task, agent, or worktree_path.
3. Only after you know which session matters:
   • use search for cross-session topic lookup
   • or list_sessions -> timeline when you already know the session
4. Fetch full bodies with get_observations only for the exact evidence you need.
5. Review the code or diff with findings first: bugs, regressions, missing tests, or ownership conflicts.

Hivemind rules

• Treat activity=working or activity=thinking as a live lane.
• Treat source=worktree-lock without a matching active session as fallback telemetry, not proof.
• Prefer the freshest exact branch match over loose task-name similarity.
• Do not fetch observation bodies for every session "just in case". hivemind exists to stop that waste.

Review checklist

• Confirm which branch or worktree owns the task.
• Check whether the lane is live, stalled, or dead.
• Pull only the memory evidence needed for the review claim.
• Review the actual diff or files after ownership is clear.
• Report findings first, highest risk first.

Output contract

• Findings first.
• Cite the branch, worktree_path, or session evidence you used.
• Call out stale telemetry or ownership collisions explicitly.
• If no findings, say so and mention residual risk or missing verification.

Example prompts

• Review PR #2 with hivemind first so you know which branch still owns the lane.
• Check whether this handoff is stale or still live before I edit the worktree.
• Find who owns the runtime bug, then review only that lane's evidence.