بنقرة واحدة
create-issues-from-text
Use when break down assignment into multiple structured issues
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Use when break down assignment into multiple structured issues
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Use when reviewing HTTP API design in a PR or change set — endpoints, routes, HTTP methods, status codes, idempotency, and input validation. Treats the API as a consumer-facing contract and flags resource-orientation, method-semantics, status-code, and trust-boundary violations. Read-only.
Use when checking that the pull request implementation actually fulfills the business requirements stated in the linked issue or task. Returns a plain-language markdown block that is the Functional review half of the two-part CR output (`@rules/code-review/general.mdc` Two-part CR output — Technical & Functional review): a full checklist of every extracted acceptance criterion with its status (Met / Not met / Partial / Divergent) and an explicit Goal met: Yes/No verdict, rendered on every run that has a linked tracker — including the fully affirmative report when every requirement is satisfied. No local file is created and the block is not embedded in the GitHub PR comment.
Use when run code review for a Bugsnag error and publish results to the linked GitHub PR and the Bugsnag error
Use when perform code review for GitHub pull requests and post findings as PR comments plus a non-technical summary to every linked issue
Use when run code review for JIRA issues and publish results to GitHub PR and JIRA
Use when senior PHP code review focused on architecture, business logic, and risk detection. Read-only.
| name | create-issues-from-text |
| description | Use when break down assignment into multiple structured issues |
| license | MIT |
| metadata | {"author":"Petr Král (pekral.cz)"} |
Split a complex assignment into multiple clear, structured issues.
@rules/compound-engineering/general.mdc Assign the most relevant existing label when creating a tracker issue)Use the template defined in templates/issue-structure.md.
Use this when the assignment is a cross-cutting mix of requirements spanning multiple parts of the application (e.g. backend + frontend + mobile, or schema + API + UI). Instead of a flat list of peer issues, build a parent → children tree so the whole effort is trackable from one place.
EPIC. Apply the EPIC label to the parent. Create the label once if the repository does not have it yet (gh label create EPIC --description "Tracks a cross-cutting effort split into sub-issues" --color 5319e7), then ignore the "already exists" outcome on subsequent runs.templates/issue-structure.md structure) scoped to a single area; do not bundle two areas into one sub-issue.Part of #<parent> so the relationship is visible from the child.- [ ] #<child> per sub-issue — under a ## Sub-issues heading, so the parent shows the full breakdown and progress.## Dependencies so a resolving run (e.g. daidalos) can pick a dependency-aware order — dependencies before dependents.EPIC-labelled parent URL plus the list of linked sub-issue URLs and the planned resolve order.