missions

name	missions
description	Break large engineering tasks into planned, validated missions executed by specialized agents. Use this skill whenever the user wants to tackle a task that is too large or complex for a single session — multi-feature work, full-stack buildouts, large refactors, or any project that benefits from structured planning, parallel execution, and independent validation. Triggers on phrases like "start a mission", "plan a mission", "mission to build X", "break this into milestones", "I need a structured plan for X", "orchestrate building X", "multi-step project", or any request that implies decomposing large work into validated stages. Also triggers on "/missions".
metadata	{"version":"0.2.0"}

Missions

Break large engineering work into planned, validated missions executed by specialized agents — each with clean context, tight scope, and independent validation.

Why This Exists

Single-agent sessions work well for narrow tasks, but real engineering work is often too large and messy for one context window. As an agent accumulates context, its focus and reliability degrade. Two specific failure modes:

• Irrelevant context buildup. Wide scope means the agent carries information that has nothing to do with its current sub-task. Signal-to-noise drops.
• Self-evaluation bias. An agent that just built something is a poor judge of whether it built it correctly. Its own reasoning biases it toward thinking what it did was right.

Missions addresses both: each worker gets a fresh, tightly-scoped context, and correctness is judged by separate validators who never saw the implementation.

Design Principles

1. Separate concerns and incentives. Each role has exactly one goal. Orchestrator plans. Workers implement. Validators judge. No role does another's job.
2. Test-driven at two scales. Workers write tests before code. The orchestrator writes a validation contract before defining features. Contract first, plan second — so the contract reflects requirements, not the plan.
3. Externalize state. No single agent holds the whole project. State lives in shared files. Each agent pulls only what's relevant.
4. Specialize models by role. Strong reasoner for orchestration (opus), reliable executor for workers (sonnet), thorough critic for validation (opus or sonnet).

---

Prerequisites

The mission.sh shell library must be sourced before any mission operations. It lives alongside this SKILL.md:

source "$(dirname "$0")/mission.sh"   # when running from skill dir

Or Claude Code can source it directly:

source /path/to/skills/missions/mission.sh

Required tools: git, yq (for YAML parsing — install via brew install yq or pip install yq). If yq is not available, fall back to parsing YAML manually in bash or have Claude read the files directly.

---

Runtime Directory Structure

Missions live in a ./missions/ directory at the project root. Each mission gets a numbered subdirectory:

./missions/
  001-add-auth/
    plan.yaml                   # Mission metadata + milestone ordering
    validation-contract.md      # Behavioral assertions — written FIRST
    features.json               # Feature specs, each claiming assertions
    AGENTS.md                   # Procedures + guardrails for workers
    knowledge/                  # Grows over time — validator learnings
      milestone-1-learnings.md
    status.yaml                 # Progress tracking (resumable)
  002-realtime-messaging/
    plan.yaml
    validation-contract.md
    ...

Add missions/ to .gitignore or commit it — user's choice. The knowledge files are valuable project artifacts worth keeping.

---

Phase 1: Intake

When the user requests a mission, start an interactive planning conversation. The goal is unambiguous requirements before any planning begins.

Process

1. Ask the user to describe what they want built or changed.
2. Investigate the codebase — read key files, understand the stack, identify constraints. Delegate deep investigation to subagents to keep your own context lean.
3. Ask clarifying questions using the AskUserQuestion tool. Push for specifics on:
   • Scope boundaries (what's in, what's explicitly out)
   • Success criteria (how will we know it's done?)
   • Constraints (tech stack, existing patterns, performance requirements)
   • Dependencies (external services, APIs, existing code that must not break) Use AskUserQuestion for each clarification round rather than dumping all questions inline. This ensures the user sees a focused prompt and you get a clear answer before moving on.
4. Summarize the requirements back to the user (via AskUserQuestion) and get explicit confirmation before proceeding.

Key rule: Do NOT start planning until the user confirms the requirements are correct and complete. Use AskUserQuestion to gate every transition between phases — intake to contract, contract to decomposition, decomposition to execution.

---

Phase 2: Validation Contract

Before defining any features, write the validation contract. This is a finite checklist of testable behavioral assertions that together define "done and correct" for this mission.

Why contract first

If you define features first and then derive a contract, the contract will be subtly shaped by the implementation plan. Writing the contract first ensures it reflects what the requirements actually demand.

Contract format

Create validation-contract.md in the mission directory. Each assertion has:

Field	Description
ID	Unique identifier (A1, A2, ...)
Behavior	One-sentence behavioral description from the user's perspective
Method	How to verify — test-runner, cli-check, browser-agent, agent-screencast, code-review, manual
Evidence	What constitutes proof — passing tests, screenshots, specific output

See references/contract-format.md for the full schema and samples/sample-contract.md for an example.

Surface assumptions before drafting

Before writing assertions, explicitly list every assumption you're making about who performs the action, what confirms success, and what's out of scope. Present these to the user via AskUserQuestion and get confirmation. Common assumptions that slip through:

• Who is the actor? (e.g., "owner" vs "admin" vs "any authenticated user")
• What constitutes confirmation/authorization for destructive actions?
• Which layers need to enforce the behavior? (API-only vs API + UI)
• What happens on failure — error message, redirect, retry?

Do not move from assumptions to contract silently. The cost of a missed assumption is a wrong contract, which cascades into wrong features.

Process

1. Surface and confirm assumptions (see above).
2. Draft the contract based on confirmed requirements and assumptions.
3. Present it to the user via AskUserQuestion: "Does this fully capture what 'done' means? Should any assertions be added, removed, or revised?"
4. Iterate until the user approves. Each revision round uses AskUserQuestion to present the updated contract and ask for confirmation.
5. Write the approved contract to the mission directory.

---

Phase 3: Feature Decomposition

Break the work into bounded features, grouped into milestones.

Features

Each feature is a self-contained unit of work that one worker can complete in a single session. A feature:

• Has a clear description and acceptance criteria
• Claims one or more assertions from the validation contract
• Lists file paths it will likely touch (helps workers orient)
• Declares dependencies on other features (if any)

Milestones

A milestone is a group of features that together produce a coherent chunk of functionality. Every milestone ends with a validation gate — work doesn't proceed to the next milestone until the current one passes validation.

Ordering

• Features within a milestone can run in parallel if they have no dependencies on each other.
• Milestones run sequentially — each builds on the last.
• Order features so that foundational work (models, schemas, utilities) comes before features that depend on it.

Process

1. Draft features and milestones based on the contract and requirements.
2. For each feature, note which contract assertions it satisfies. Every assertion must be claimed by at least one feature.
3. Present the plan to the user via AskUserQuestion for approval. Include the milestone structure, feature list, and parallelism decisions.
4. Write features.json and plan.yaml to the mission directory.

See references/plan-format.md for the file schemas.

---

Phase 4: Shared State Setup

Create the remaining state files before execution begins.

AGENTS.md

Worker procedures and guardrails. This file is included in every worker's prompt. It contains:

• Project context (tech stack, directory structure, key patterns)
• Coding standards and conventions to follow
• Things to avoid (patterns, anti-patterns, known pitfalls)
• Test requirements (framework, coverage expectations, test-first mandate)
• How to signal completion or blockers

See references/agents-template.md for the template.

status.yaml

Initialize with all features as pending and all milestones as pending. This file is updated throughout execution and enables resuming interrupted missions.

knowledge/

Create the directory. It starts empty. Validators will populate it with learnings as milestones complete.

Shell setup

source /path/to/skills/missions/mission.sh
mission_init "add-auth"
# Creates: ./missions/001-add-auth/ with subdirectories
# Creates and checks out branch: mission/001-add-auth

Note: mission_init creates a dedicated mission/<id>-<slug> branch off the current branch. All mission work happens on this branch. The parent branch (e.g. main) is recorded in plan.yaml so the mission can be merged or PR'd back when complete.

---

Phase 5: Execution

This is the deterministic runner loop. Follow the plan mechanically — do not improvise during execution.

For each milestone

5a. Launch agents for each feature

Each feature is implemented by a separate Agent() tool call with isolation: "worktree". The skill calls these "workers" — that's just a role label, not a special system concept. A worker is an Agent subagent.

Prompt construction (see references/worker-prompt.md for template):

1. Include the feature spec from features.json (description, assertions, file hints)
2. Include AGENTS.md (procedures and guardrails)
3. Include relevant knowledge files from previous milestones
4. Instruct the agent to write tests FIRST, then implement
5. Instruct the agent to commit its work with a clear message

Running features in parallel: If features within a milestone have no dependencies on each other, call multiple Agent() tools in a single response message. Claude Code runs all Agent calls from one message concurrently. Use model: "sonnet" unless the feature requires complex reasoning.

Example — launching two independent features in parallel (both Agent calls in the same response):

// Call 1 (in the same response)
Agent(
  description: "Feature F1: user model",
  isolation: "worktree",
  model: "sonnet",
  prompt: <constructed prompt for F1>
)

// Call 2 (in the same response — runs concurrently with Call 1)
Agent(
  description: "Feature F2: auth middleware",
  isolation: "worktree",
  model: "sonnet",
  prompt: <constructed prompt for F2>
)

Sequential features: If a feature depends on another (dependencies is non-empty), wait for the dependency to complete and merge before launching the dependent feature.

5b. Merge completed worktrees

After each worker completes, if it made changes:

• The Agent tool returns the worktree branch name
• Merge the worker's branch back to the mission branch:

mission_merge <mission-dir> <branch-name>

Workers always merge into the mission branch (mission/<id>-<slug>), never directly into the parent branch. This keeps all mission work isolated until the full mission is validated and ready.

If merge conflicts occur, attempt to resolve them. If resolution requires human judgment, use AskUserQuestion to present the conflict and ask the user how to proceed.

5c. Update status

After each feature completes, update status.yaml:

mission_feature_done <mission-dir> <feature-id>

---

Phase 6: Validation

Once all features in a milestone are complete, run validation with fresh agents. There are two types:

6a. Scrutiny validators

For each feature in the milestone, launch a scrutiny validator agent that:

1. Reads the feature's implementation (the actual code changes)
2. Reviews for quality, correctness, edge cases, and potential regressions
3. Writes learnings to knowledge/milestone-N-learnings.md
4. Reports issues as a structured list: {severity, description, file, suggestion}

Use references/scrutiny-validator-prompt.md for the prompt template.

6b. User-testing validators

Launch validator agents that interact with the built system as a black box:

1. Read the validation contract
2. For each assertion assigned to this milestone's features:
   • Execute the specified verification method (run tests, check CLI output, etc.)
   • Collect the required evidence
3. Report pass/fail for each assertion with evidence

Use references/user-test-validator-prompt.md for the prompt template.

Parallelism: Launch scrutiny and user-testing validators in parallel. Use model: "sonnet" or model: "opus" depending on complexity.

---

Phase 7: Fix Loop

If validation surfaces issues:

1. Read all validator reports.
2. For each actionable issue, create a targeted fix-feature — a small, scoped unit of work that addresses the specific problem.
3. Add fix-features to features.json with status pending.
4. Execute the fix-features (same as Phase 5 — worker agents with worktrees).
5. Re-run validation for the milestone.
6. Repeat until validation passes.

Convergence expectation: Most milestones converge in 2–4 validation rounds. If a milestone hasn't converged after 4 rounds, escalate.

---

Phase 8: Escalation

If something blocks that the system can't resolve:

• Merge conflicts that require human judgment
• Ambiguous requirements discovered during implementation
• Validation failures that persist after 4 fix rounds
• External dependencies that are unavailable

Stop the mission, preserve all state (status.yaml reflects exactly where things stand), and use AskUserQuestion to present the blocker:

1. What was attempted
2. Why it failed
3. What the user needs to decide or provide
4. How to resume once the blocker is resolved

AskUserQuestion is essential here — it pauses execution and waits for the user's input before continuing. Do not attempt to work around the blocker.

---

Phase 9: Completion

When all milestones pass validation, present the validation contract evidence to the user. This is the mission's deliverable — the user cannot evaluate quality without seeing proof.

Contract evidence table

Present every assertion as a row:

ID	Assertion	Method	Status	Evidence
A1	API requires confirm field	test-runner	PASS	3 tests: missing (400), wrong (400), correct (200)
A2	deleteOrg called on confirm	test-runner	PASS	Test verifies org status → 'deleted' in CP DB
...	...	...	...	...

Rules:

• Every assertion must appear. No silent omissions.
• Status is PASS or FAIL. If FAIL, explain what's unresolved.
• Evidence is one line — not a paragraph. Link to the test file or screenshot.
• If a validator caught and fixed issues, note the fix briefly.

Summary

After the table, provide a brief summary:

• Files changed (count and list)
• Tests added/modified
• Critical issues caught by validators (if any)
• Branch name for PR

Do NOT mark the mission complete or update status.yaml to complete until the evidence table has been presented to the user.

Merge to parent

Once the user approves, merge the mission branch back to the parent branch or open a PR:

Option A: Open a PR (recommended)

mission_pr <mission-dir>
# Pushes mission branch, opens PR against parent branch

Option B: Direct merge

git checkout <parent-branch>
git merge mission/<id>-<slug> --no-ff -m "mission: complete <slug>"

Use AskUserQuestion to ask the user which approach they prefer before finalizing.

---

Resuming a Mission

Missions are resumable. To resume:

1. Read status.yaml to determine where execution stopped.
2. Read features.json to find pending/failed features.
3. Continue from the next incomplete feature or re-run the failed validation.

mission_status ./missions/001-add-auth
# Shows: Milestone 2/4, Feature 3/7 complete, validation pending

---

Listing Missions

mission_list
# 001-add-auth        ✓ completed   2026-04-10
# 002-realtime-msgs   ◆ in-progress 2026-04-11  M2/F3

---

Quick Reference: Shell Commands

Command	Description
mission_init <slug>	Create new mission directory
mission_list	List all missions with status
mission_status <dir>	Show detailed progress for a mission
mission_feature_done <dir> <id>	Mark feature complete in status.yaml
mission_milestone_done <dir> <id>	Mark milestone complete
mission_merge <dir> <branch>	Merge a worker's branch into mission branch
mission_pr <dir>	Push mission branch and open PR to parent branch
mission_next_id	Get next sequential mission number

---

Quick Reference: Agent Roles

Role	Agent() params	Purpose
Orchestrator	(you — not a subagent)	Plans, decomposes, manages execution
Worker	model: "sonnet", isolation: "worktree"	Implements a single feature. Tests first.
Scrutiny validator	model: "sonnet" or "opus"	Reviews implementation quality, writes learnings
User-test validator	model: "sonnet" or "opus"	Black-box behavioral testing against contract
Research subagent	model: "haiku" or "sonnet"	Investigates codebase questions for orchestrator

All roles except Orchestrator are Agent() tool calls. "Worker", "validator", etc. are role labels in the prompt — not special system concepts. To run agents in parallel, include multiple Agent() calls in a single response.