planning-and-task-breakdown

name	planning-and-task-breakdown
description	Breaks .NET/C# work into ordered, verifiable tasks. Use when you have a spec or clear requirements and need to decompose work into implementable units with dotnet CLI verification steps. Use when a task feels too large to start, when you need to estimate scope across a multi-project solution, or when parallel work is possible.
version	0.2.0
source	vendor/agent-skills/skills/planning-and-task-breakdown/SKILL.md@44dac80

Planning and Task Breakdown

Overview

Decompose work into small, verifiable tasks with explicit acceptance criteria. Good task breakdown is the difference between an agent that completes work reliably and one that produces a tangled mess. Every task should be small enough to implement, test, and verify in a single focused session.

When to Use

• You have a spec and need to break it into implementable units
• A task feels too large or vague to start
• Work needs to be parallelized across multiple agents or sessions
• You need to communicate scope to a human
• The implementation order isn't obvious

When NOT to use: Single-file changes with obvious scope, or when the spec already contains well-defined tasks.

The Planning Process

Step 1: Enter Plan Mode

Before writing any code, operate in read-only mode:

• Read the spec and relevant codebase sections
• Identify existing patterns and conventions
• Map dependencies between projects and assemblies
• Note risks and unknowns

Do NOT write code during planning. The output is a plan document, not implementation.

Step 2: Identify the Dependency Graph

Map what depends on what:

Database schema / EF Core entities
    │
    ├── DTOs / contracts
    │       │
    │       ├── API endpoints or service methods
    │       │       │
    │       │       └── UI bindings (Avalonia / Blazor / MAUI)
    │       │               │
    │       │               └── Views and view models
    │       │
    │       └── Validation logic (FluentValidation, DataAnnotations)
    │
    └── Seed data / migrations (EF Core `dotnet ef migrations`)

Implementation order follows the dependency graph bottom-up: build foundations first. Within a .NET solution, that usually means MyApp.Core → MyApp.Infrastructure → MyApp.Contracts → MyApp (host project).

Step 3: Slice Vertically

Instead of building all the database, then all the API, then all the UI — build one complete feature path at a time:

Bad (horizontal slicing):

Task 1: Build entire EF Core model
Task 2: Build all controllers / service methods
Task 3: Build all views
Task 4: Connect everything

Good (vertical slicing):

Task 1: User can create an account (entity + migration + endpoint + UI)
Task 2: User can log in (auth scheme + endpoint + UI)
Task 3: User can create a task (entity + migration + endpoint + UI)
Task 4: User can view task list (query + endpoint + UI list view)

Each vertical slice delivers working, testable functionality.

Step 4: Write Tasks

Each task follows this structure:

## Task [N]: [Short descriptive title]

**Description:** One paragraph explaining what this task accomplishes.

**Acceptance criteria:**
- [ ] [Specific, testable condition]
- [ ] [Specific, testable condition]

**Verification:**
- [ ] Tests pass: `dotnet test --filter "FullyQualifiedName~FeatureName"`
- [ ] Build succeeds: `dotnet build -warnaserror`
- [ ] Format clean: `dotnet format --verify-no-changes`
- [ ] Manual check: [description of what to verify]

**Dependencies:** [Task numbers this depends on, or "None"]

**Files likely touched:**
- `src/MyApp.Core/Feature/Thing.cs`
- `tests/MyApp.Core.Tests/Feature/ThingTests.cs`

**Estimated scope:** [Small: 1-2 files | Medium: 3-5 files | Large: 5+ files]

Step 5: Order and Checkpoint

Arrange tasks so that:

1. Dependencies are satisfied (build foundation first)
2. Each task leaves the system in a working state
3. Verification checkpoints occur after every 2-3 tasks
4. High-risk tasks are early (fail fast)

Add explicit checkpoints:

## Checkpoint: After Tasks 1-3
- [ ] All tests pass (`dotnet test`)
- [ ] Solution builds without warnings (`dotnet build -warnaserror`)
- [ ] Core user flow works end-to-end
- [ ] Review with human before proceeding

Task Sizing Guidelines

Size	Files	Scope	Example
XS	1	Single method or config change	Add a validation attribute
S	1-2	One class or endpoint	Add a new controller action
M	3-5	One feature slice	User registration flow (entity + migration + endpoint + view)
L	5-8	Multi-component feature	Search with filtering and pagination across UI + API + query
XL	8+	Too large — break it down further	—

If a task is L or larger, it should be broken into smaller tasks. An agent performs best on S and M tasks.

When to break a task down further:

• It would take more than one focused session (roughly 2+ hours of agent work)
• You cannot describe the acceptance criteria in 3 or fewer bullet points
• It touches two or more independent projects in the solution (e.g., MyApp.Core and MyApp.Payments)
• You find yourself writing "and" in the task title (a sign it is two tasks)

Plan Document Template

# Implementation Plan: [Feature/Project Name]

## Overview
[One paragraph summary of what we're building]

## Architecture Decisions
- [Key decision 1 and rationale — e.g., "Use EF Core 8 with owned entity types for value objects"]
- [Key decision 2 and rationale — e.g., "Wire MediatR for CQRS at the ASP.NET Core boundary"]

## Task List

### Phase 1: Foundation
- [ ] Task 1: ...
- [ ] Task 2: ...

### Checkpoint: Foundation
- [ ] `dotnet test` green, `dotnet build -warnaserror` clean

### Phase 2: Core Features
- [ ] Task 3: ...
- [ ] Task 4: ...

### Checkpoint: Core Features
- [ ] End-to-end flow works (run host project, exercise the slice)

### Phase 3: Polish
- [ ] Task 5: ...
- [ ] Task 6: ...

### Checkpoint: Complete
- [ ] All acceptance criteria met
- [ ] Ready for review

## Risks and Mitigations
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|--------|------------|
| [Risk] | [High/Med/Low] | [Strategy] |

## Open Questions
- [Question needing human input]

Parallelization Opportunities

When multiple agents or sessions are available:

• Safe to parallelize: Independent feature slices, tests for already-implemented features, documentation
• Must be sequential: EF Core migrations, shared DbContext changes, dependency chains, anything that touches .csproj references
• Needs coordination: Features that share a DTO or API contract (define the contract in MyApp.Contracts first, then parallelize)

Common Rationalizations

Rationalization	Reality
"I'll figure it out as I go"	That's how you end up with a tangled mess and rework. 10 minutes of planning saves hours.
"The tasks are obvious"	Write them down anyway. Explicit tasks surface hidden dependencies and forgotten edge cases.
"Planning is overhead"	Planning is the task. Implementation without a plan is just typing.
"I can hold it all in my head"	Context windows are finite. Written plans survive session boundaries and compaction.

Red Flags

• Starting implementation without a written task list
• Tasks that say "implement the feature" without acceptance criteria
• No verification steps in the plan
• All tasks are XL-sized
• No checkpoints between tasks
• Dependency order isn't considered
• A task that spans more than two projects in the solution

Verification

Before starting implementation, confirm:

• Every task has acceptance criteria
• Every task has a verification step (concrete dotnet command or manual check)
• Task dependencies are identified and ordered correctly
• No task touches more than ~5 files
• Checkpoints exist between major phases
• The human has reviewed and approved the plan

---

Source & Modifications

• Upstream: https://github.com/addyosmani/agent-skills/blob/44dac80216da709913fb410f632a65547866346f/skills/planning-and-task-breakdown/SKILL.md
• Pinned commit: 44dac80216da709913fb410f632a65547866346f (synced 2026-04-19)
• Status: modified
• Changes:
  • Dependency graph relabeled for .NET: EF Core entities, DTOs/contracts, Avalonia/Blazor/MAUI bindings; added hint about EF Core migration commands
  • Project layout references explicitly named (MyApp.Core, MyApp.Infrastructure, MyApp.Contracts, host project)
  • Task verification block uses dotnet test --filter, dotnet build -warnaserror, dotnet format --verify-no-changes instead of npm commands
  • File-path examples use .cs extensions and src/MyApp.Core/…, tests/MyApp.Core.Tests/… layout
  • Task sizing table example text retargeted for .NET (validation attribute, controller action, multi-project solution)
  • Parallelization guidance: EF Core migrations + DbContext + .csproj references called out as sequential; MyApp.Contracts identified as the coordination point for parallel work
  • Architecture decisions example uses EF Core 8 + MediatR rather than generic wording
  • Checkpoint commands use dotnet test / dotnet build -warnaserror
  • Added "spans more than two projects" to the red-flag list
  • All structural sections, rationalization table, and planning workflow preserved from upstream verbatim
• License: MIT © 2025 Addy Osmani — see ../../LICENSES/agent-skills-MIT.txt