| name | manage-a-research-collaboration |
| category | school |
| description | Manage a research collaboration through shared questions, contribution agreements, ethical authority, version control, conflict handling, and publication decisions. Use when several people or institutions jointly produce research. |
manage-a-research-collaboration
Make authority, credit, care, and evidence explicit before pressure rises.
When to use
- Use across disciplines, institutions, communities, countries, or career stages.
- Do not treat funding, seniority, data ownership, or administration as automatic authorship.
Preconditions
- Identify partners, communities, funders, institutions, ethics approvals, agreements, data, risks, and decision authority.
Procedure
- Write a collaboration charter covering purpose, scope, values, roles, decisions, communication, resources, and review.
- Map legal, ethics, community, data, intellectual-property, confidentiality, export, and publication authority.
- Define expected contributions and revisit authorship, acknowledgment, and order throughout the work.
- Establish repositories, naming, versioning, access, provenance, analysis, and backup rules.
- Set meeting cadence, decision records, issue escalation, safe dissent, conflict disclosure, and recusal.
- Track milestones, dependencies, capacity, changes, and support for junior or marginalized contributors.
- Define review, release, correction, withdrawal, departure, dispute, and closeout processes.
- Periodically audit whether practice matches the charter and repair inequities.
Failure plan
- If ethics or data authority conflicts, stop affected work until authorized governance resolves it.
- If a contributor faces retaliation or unsafe power, use an independent escalation route.
Worked example
Three universities and a community organization share decision rights, record local data authority, revisit credit after fieldwork, and preserve a community review without granting factual veto.
Done
- A collaboration charter and status report record roles, authority, contributions, ethics, data, decisions, conflicts, milestones, publication, and departures
- Contribution, access, consent, version, recusal, safe-escalation, authorship, and closeout checks verify accountable operation