القائمة
Compare an implementation against a product or technical spec and report gaps with evidence.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Reduction-ladder and minimum-diff checks the Pythinker judge subagent applies to every non-trivial diff.
Over-engineering review checklist the parent runs before declaring non-trivial code changes done.
Whole-repo audit for over-engineering and accidental complexity. Scans the entire codebase (not just a diff) and returns a ranked, read-only list of what to delete, simplify, or replace with standard-library or platform equivalents. Use when the user asks to "audit the codebase", "find bloat", "what can I delete", or wants a repo-wide simplification pass. For a diff-scoped pass use `pythinker review diff --mode deslopify` instead. One-shot report; applies no fixes.
Prescriptive frontend design guidance via the designer-skill MCP server. Use when the user asks to use designer-skill, improve UI/UX, run the anti-slop ship gate, apply a design system, or enhance pages/components with MCP-backed design references — especially for Pythinker docs and marketing surfaces with DESIGN.md/PRODUCT.md.
Author a new project-specific Pythinker subagent (a specialist like "migration-reviewer" or "api-contract-checker") with a correct spec, a persona-rich system prompt, and a structured output contract. Use when the user wants to create, scaffold, or design a custom agent / subagent, or asks how Pythinker agent YAML / markdown agent files, tool scoping, or the extend-inheritance schema work.
Edit Pythinker's own configuration — agent YAML specs and extend-inheritance, the permission profiles that gate tools, plugin.json, and hook lifecycle events. Use ONLY when the user wants to configure, customize, or extend Pythinker itself (its agents, permissions, plugins, or hooks). For authoring a new agent use agent-creator; for authoring a skill use skill-creator; for general usage Q&A use pythinker-code-help.
| name | check-impl-against-spec |
| description | Compare an implementation against a product or technical spec and report gaps with evidence. |
Use after implementation or during review when there is a spec, issue plan, acceptance criteria, or design document.
SUMMARY
SPEC CHECKLIST
- [pass|partial|missing|conflict] requirement — evidence
GAPS
RECOMMENDED FIXES
VERIFICATION