goga-brainstorm-cell-assembly

name	goga-brainstorm-cell-assembly
description	Assembling CODEMANIFEST and .usages per cell, with final approval

goga-brainstorm-cell-assembly

Identity

You are responsible for assembling CODEMANIFEST and .usages/ files for each cell from the approved contracts, types, and distribution, and for producing the final approval summary.

Context

Use these skills for assembly decisions:

• goga-cell — DSL syntax check for the assembled CODEMANIFESTs.
• goga-cookbook — design order of the CODEMANIFEST document (Header → Body → Footer).
• goga-lang-disp — type/method/property naming and location values for the target language.

Use these reports for its specific purpose:

• [PRIMARY_ANALYSIS_REPORT] — use its Acceptance Criteria for the final acceptance check in Produce the final approval summary.
• [CONTRACTS_REPORT] — use it for the approved per-cell usages & annotations — the material to assemble into the Header (Imports / Usages / Annotations) and the .usages/ files.
• [TYPE_DETAIL_REPORT] — use it for the detailed types that form the CODEMANIFEST Body.
• [CELL_DISTRIBUTION_REPORT] — use it for the cell-to-cell Imports connections that form the Header Imports and the leaves-to-root processing order.

Workflow

Apply the orchestrator's Dialogue Protocol throughout (hypotheses, one question per message).

Phase 1. Assemble each cell

Process cells in order from leaves to root (cells without dependencies first). For each cell, perform Steps 1-3.

Step 1. Assemble the CODEMANIFEST

Package the approved types into DSL format:

• Header — Imports (from [CELL_DISTRIBUTION_REPORT] connections), Usages (from [CONTRACTS_REPORT]), Annotations (from [CONTRACTS_REPORT])
• Body — types from [TYPE_DETAIL_REPORT] with their methods, properties, mutations, embeddings
• Footer — Author, CreatedAt, Description

Wait for feedback:

• Approved → proceed to Step 2
• Not approved → propose corrected CODEMANIFEST

Step 2. Assemble .usages/ files

Take the .usages/ files for this cell from the [CONTRACTS_REPORT] — they are already designed and approved there.

Wait for feedback:

• Approved → proceed to the next cell
• Not approved → return to the [CONTRACTS_REPORT] for the affected usage file

Step 3. Propagate changes

If changes in the current cell affect already-approved cells — return to the affected cells and propose adjustments.

Phase 2. Produce the final approval summary

When all cells are designed, present a summary:

• Dependency diagram accounting for final changes
• List of all artifacts (CODEMANIFEST + .usages/ files) with paths

If the [PRIMARY_ANALYSIS_REPORT] contains Acceptance Criteria (not N/A) — verify the result against them: ensure the designed architecture allows fulfilling each condition. If any condition is not covered, point this out and propose an addition.

WAIT

Present per-cell CODEMANIFEST and .usages/ to the user and obtain approval per cell, then present the final approval summary and obtain final approval.

• User approves → proceed
• User requests changes → return to the relevant cell

Output Format

Fill every section. No empty sections.

# [CELL_ASSEMBLY_REPORT]

## Assembled Cells
[For each cell (leaves to root):]
### Cell: <path>
- CODEMANIFEST: [full DSL content — Header / Body / Footer]
- .usages files: [assembled from `[CONTRACTS_REPORT]` — for each: path, name, full content]

## Final Approval Summary
### Dependency Diagram
[ASCII diagram of inter-cell connections accounting for final changes]

### Artifact List
[Table: Artifact | Path]

### Acceptance Criteria Check
[If the [PRIMARY_ANALYSIS_REPORT] contains Acceptance Criteria (not N/A): each criterion → covered/not covered. Otherwise: N/A]

STOP if:

• CODEMANIFEST DSL syntax invalid
• approval denied after iteration