بنقرة واحدة
runbook
Structured incident investigation.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Structured incident investigation.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Post-implementation integrity and quality audit.
Session-start skill discovery protocol.
Structured root-cause investigation for bugs and failures.
Execute implementation plan task-by-task inline.
Complete work with merge, PR, or cleanup options.
Integrity guardrails during code implementation.
| name | runbook |
| description | Structured incident investigation. |
Structured incident investigation: symptom intake, triage, investigation, resolution, documentation. Every step collects evidence.
Core principle: Collect evidence before forming hypotheses. Do not fix what you have not diagnosed.
Not for: planned maintenance, feature development, or issues with obvious root cause already known.
1. Intake — Capture symptoms, timeline, blast radius
2. Triage — Severity assessment, who to notify, immediate mitigation
3. Investigate — Systematic evidence gathering, hypothesis testing
4. Resolve — Apply fix, verify, monitor
5. Document — Post-incident report with timeline and learnings
Capture before investigating:
# Quick checks to establish timeline
git log --oneline --since="2 hours ago" # recent deploys
# Check monitoring dashboards, alert history
# Check infrastructure change logs
| Signal | Severity | Response |
|---|---|---|
| Data loss, security breach | Critical | All hands, immediate mitigation, notify stakeholders |
| Service fully down | High | On-call team, rollback consideration |
| Degraded performance, partial outage | Medium | Investigate, communicate ETA |
| Cosmetic, non-blocking | Low | Queue for next business day |
Immediate mitigation options (before root cause is known):
Systematic, not ad hoc. Work from evidence, not hunches.
Evidence gathering order:
Hypothesis testing: Form hypothesis, predict what evidence would confirm or refute, check that evidence. Do not confirmation-bias toward the first theory.
Use arsyn:debugging for deep root cause analysis when the surface investigation identifies the failing component but not the underlying cause.
Write post-incident report. See references/incident-template.md for format.
Key sections: timeline, root cause, impact, resolution, action items. The report serves future investigations — be specific about what worked and what did not during diagnosis.
| Phase | Key question | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Intake | What exactly is happening? | Symptom summary with timeline |
| Triage | How bad is it? | Severity level + immediate actions |
| Investigate | Why is it happening? | Root cause with evidence |
| Resolve | Is it fixed? | Verified fix + monitoring |
| Document | What did we learn? | Post-incident report |