Use when the user says "new issue", "create an issue", "file an issue", "/new-issue", or asks to turn a bug, idea, or discussion into a GitHub issue. Takes an optional description of what the issue should cover; with no input, derives the issue from what was discussed in the current conversation. Verifies claims against the code before filing and produces a complete, complexity-scored issue — never a stub.
Use when the user asks to validate, review, or check whether a GitHub issue is valid. Takes a GitHub issue URL or number (defaults to the latest open issue in the current repo). Verifies every factual claim against the actual code with file:line citations rather than trusting the author's description; for non-trivial proposals, also checks architectural feasibility and proposal self-consistency.
Use when the user asks to validate a GitHub issue with Fable 5, always plan it with Fable 5, and autonomously drive it to a reviewed PR in one shot — "fable-validate-fableplan-loop", "fable validate, fable plan, and work on
Use when the user asks to validate a GitHub issue with Fable 5 and then autonomously drive it to a reviewed PR in one shot — "fable-validate-loop", "fable validate and work on
Required format for creating or editing any GitHub issue — [C<score>] title convention, complexity rationale line, complete-body rule, attribution footer. Load BEFORE creating or editing a GitHub issue.
Use when the user asks to validate a GitHub issue (without Fable), conditionally plan it with fableplan, then autonomously drive it to a reviewed PR in one shot — "validate-fableplan-loop", "validate, plan, and work on
Use when the user asks to validate a GitHub issue and then autonomously drive it to a reviewed PR in one shot — "validate and work on this issue", "validate-issue-loop", "fully automate issue
Required format and rules for writing any pull request (PR) review comment — verdict line, section structure, materiality filter, safety carve-out. Load BEFORE composing or posting a PR review.