rc-qa-execution

name	rc-qa-execution
description	Executes full-project QA like a real user by discovering the repository verification and E2E contracts, running build, lint, test, and startup commands, exercising core workflows end-to-end through CLI, HTTP, and browser interfaces, requiring automated regression coverage for supported critical flows, fixing root-cause regressions, and rerunning the full gate. Uses the agent-browser companion skill for Web UI validation when a web surface exists. Use when validating a branch, release candidate, migration, refactor, or risky commit. Do not use for static code review only, one-off unit test edits, planning test cases, or architecture brainstorming without execution.
argument-hint	[qa-output-path]
model	sonnet
effort	high

Systematic Project QA

Required Inputs

• qa-output-path (optional): Directory where QA artifacts (issues, screenshots, verification reports) are stored. When provided, create the directory if it does not exist and use it for all QA outputs. When omitted, fall back to repository conventions or /tmp/codex-qa-<slug>.

Procedures

Step 1: Discover the Repository QA Contract

1. Read root instructions, repository docs, and CI/build files before running commands.
2. Execute python3 scripts/discover-project-contract.py --root . to surface candidate install, verify, build, test, lint, start commands, Web UI signals, and E2E signals.
3. Read references/project-signals.md when command ownership is ambiguous or when multiple ecosystems are present.
4. Read references/e2e-coverage.md to decide whether the repository already supports public-surface automated coverage and how strong that support is.
5. Prefer repository-defined umbrella commands such as make verify, just verify, or CI entrypoints over language-default commands.
6. Identify the changed surface and the regression-critical surface before choosing scenarios.
7. Determine whether the project has a Web UI surface. Indicators include: a start or dev command that launches a web server, framework config files (next.config.*, vite.config.*, nuxt.config.*, angular.json, svelte.config.*), or HTML/template entry points. Record the dev server URL (default http://localhost:3000 unless the project specifies otherwise).
8. Record the E2E contract in working notes: support detected or not, harness name, canonical command, known spec locations, and blockers.
9. Resolve the QA artifact directory. If the user provided a qa-output-path argument, use that path. Otherwise, use repository conventions. If neither exists, fall back to /tmp/codex-qa-<slug>. Create the qa/ subdirectory under the resolved path if it does not exist. Store all issues, screenshots, and verification reports under <qa-output-path>/qa/.

Step 2: Define the QA Scope

1. Check whether <qa-output-path>/qa/test-cases/ and <qa-output-path>/qa/test-plans/ contain artifacts from a prior QA planning run. If they exist, read the test plans, test case IDs, and automation annotations to seed the execution matrix and prioritize P0/P1 test cases.
2. Build a short execution matrix covering baseline verification, changed workflows, unchanged business-critical workflows, and automation follow-up.
3. Read references/checklist.md and ensure every required category has a planned validation.
4. Prefer public entry points such as CLI commands, HTTP endpoints, browser flows, worker jobs, and documented setup commands over internal test helpers.
5. Classify each changed or regression-critical public flow as existing-e2e, needs-e2e, manual-only, or blocked.
6. Require the needs-e2e classification when the repository already supports E2E and the flow is P0, P1, release-critical smoke coverage, or a reproduced public regression. Do not downgrade such flows to manual-only without a concrete reason.
7. When a Web UI surface exists, read references/web-ui-qa.md and select 3-5 critical user flows to exercise through the browser. Prioritize flows that cover the changed surface and the most business-critical paths.
8. Create the smallest realistic fixture or fake project needed to exercise the workflow when the repository does not already include one.
9. Treat mocks as a local unit-test boundary only. Do not use mocks or stubs as final proof that a user flow works.

Step 3: Establish the Baseline

1. Install dependencies with the repository-preferred command before testing runtime flows.
2. Run the canonical verification gate once before scenario testing to establish baseline health. Execute in fastest-first order: lint and type-check, then build, then unit tests, then integration tests.
3. If the E2E command is separate from the umbrella gate, decide whether to run it in baseline now or after runtime prerequisites are ready, then record that plan explicitly.
4. If the baseline fails, read the first failing output carefully and determine whether it is pre-existing or introduced by current work before moving on.
5. When the project has a Web UI surface, start the dev server in the background using the discovered start command. Confirm readiness by waiting for the server to respond (e.g., curl -sf -o /dev/null http://localhost:<port> returns 0, or startup logs emit a ready signal).
6. Start services in the closest supported production-like mode and confirm readiness through observable signals such as health checks, startup logs, or successful handshakes.

Step 4: Execute CLI and API Flows

1. Drive CLI and API workflows through the same interfaces a real operator or user would use.
2. Capture the exact command, input, and observable result for each scenario.
3. Validate changed features first, then validate at least one regression-critical flow outside the changed surface.
4. Exercise live integrations when credentials and local prerequisites exist. When they do not, validate every reachable local boundary and record the blocked live step explicitly.
5. Record whether each validated flow already has matching automated coverage or should move to needs-e2e.
6. Re-run the scenario from a clean state when the first attempt leaves the environment ambiguous.

Step 5: Execute Web UI Flows

Skip this step if the project has no Web UI surface.

1. Read references/web-ui-qa.md for the full browser testing procedure and checklist.
2. Use the agent-browser CLI (from the agent-browser companion skill) for all browser interactions. The core loop is: open, snapshot, interact, re-snapshot, verify. Valid commands are: open, back, forward, reload, snapshot -i, click @ref, fill @ref "text", select @ref "value", press Key, check @ref, uncheck @ref, wait, get text @ref, get url, get title, screenshot, state save, state load, close. Do not invent commands outside this set.
3. For each critical user flow identified in Step 2: a. Navigate to the entry URL: agent-browser open <url>. b. Take an interactive snapshot: agent-browser snapshot -i to get element refs (@e1, @e2, etc.). c. Execute the planned interactions using refs: agent-browser click @e1, agent-browser fill @e2 "text", etc. d. Re-snapshot after every navigation or significant DOM change. Refs become stale after page transitions. e. Verify the expected outcome by checking element text, page URL, or visible state via snapshot output. f. Capture screenshot evidence: agent-browser screenshot <qa-output-path>/qa/screenshots/<flow-name>.png.
4. Test critical form flows: fill valid data and verify success, fill invalid data and verify error messages appear.
5. When the changed surface includes responsive behavior, test at multiple viewports. Read the viewport testing section of references/web-ui-qa.md for session setup.
6. Verify navigation flows: page transitions, back/forward, deep links, and 404 handling.
7. Check error and loading states: trigger error conditions and verify the UI handles them gracefully.
8. Map each browser flow to its automation classification. When a harness exists but no matching spec exists, keep the flow in needs-e2e until coverage is added or the blocker is documented.
9. Close the browser session after all flows complete: agent-browser close.

Step 6: Diagnose and Fix Regressions

1. Reproduce each failure consistently before proposing a fix.
2. Activate companion debugging and test-hygiene skills when available, especially root-cause debugging and anti-workaround guidance.
3. Add or update the narrowest regression coverage that proves the bug when the repository supports automated coverage for that surface.
4. When the repository already supports E2E and the failure affects a public browser, HTTP, or CLI flow, add or update E2E coverage instead of stopping at unit or integration proof.
5. If the harness does not exist, keep manual proof and record the blocker rather than bootstrapping a new E2E framework during QA.
6. Fix production code or real configuration at the source of the failure. Do not weaken tests to match broken behavior.
7. Re-run the narrow reproduction, updated automated coverage, impacted scenario, and baseline gate after each fix.
8. For Web UI regressions, reproduce the visual failure with agent-browser, capture before/after screenshots under <qa-output-path>/qa/screenshots/, and verify the fix through the same browser flow.
9. Use assets/issue-template.md to write issue files under <qa-output-path>/qa/issues/. Create the subdirectory if it does not exist. Name each file using the BUG-<num>.md convention (e.g., BUG-001.md). Assign Severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low) and Priority (P0-P3) to every issue. When an issue was discovered while executing a test case from a prior QA test plan, include the TC-ID in the Related section and fill in the automation follow-up fields.

Step 7: Verify the Final State

1. Re-run the full repository verification gate from scratch after the last code change.
2. Re-run the most important CLI and API scenarios after the full gate passes.
3. Re-run the narrow E2E specs that were added or updated and, when the repository supports E2E, re-run the canonical E2E command or the smallest repository-defined subset that covers the touched critical flows.
4. When Web UI flows were tested, re-run the critical browser flows and capture final screenshot evidence.
5. Summarize the evidence using assets/verification-report-template.md and write the report to <qa-output-path>/qa/verification-report.md. The report must include these mandatory fields: Claim, Command, Executed timestamp, Exit code, Output summary, Warnings, Errors, Verdict (PASS or FAIL), plus an Automated Coverage section with support detected, required flows, specs added or updated, commands executed, and manual-only or blocked items. When Web UI flows were tested, append a Browser Evidence section with: Dev server URL, Flows tested count, per-flow entry (name, entry URL, final URL, verdict, screenshot path), Viewports tested, Authentication method, and Blocked flows.
6. Report blocked scenarios, missing credentials, or environment gaps with the exact command or prerequisite that stopped execution.
7. Do not claim completion without fresh verification evidence from the current state of the repository.

Error Handling

• If command discovery returns multiple plausible gates, prefer the broadest repository-defined command and explain the tie-breaker.
• If E2E support signals are weak or contradictory, prefer explicit config files and runnable commands before claiming that the repository supports E2E.
• If no canonical verify command exists, read references/project-signals.md, choose the broadest safe install, lint, test, and build commands for the detected ecosystem, and state that assumption explicitly.
• If a required live dependency is unavailable, validate every local boundary that does not require the missing dependency and report the blocked live validation separately.
• If a workflow requires data or services absent from the repository, create the smallest realistic fixture outside the main source tree unless the repository has its own fixture convention.
• If a failure appears unrelated to the requested change, prove that with a clean reproduction before excluding it from the QA scope.
• If the repository has an E2E harness but credentials, runtime services, or test data prevent execution, keep the affected flow classified as blocked and report the exact prerequisite that is missing.
• If the repository lacks an E2E harness, do not bootstrap a new framework during QA. Keep live manual evidence and document the automation gap as manual-only or blocked.
• If agent-browser is not installed or the dev server fails to start, skip Web UI flows, document the blocker in the verification report, and continue with CLI and API validation only.
• If a browser flow hangs or times out, close the session with agent-browser close, record the failure, and attempt the flow once more from a clean session before marking it as blocked.