القائمة
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the user-invoked skills in this repo.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Stages all changes and generates a lean Conventional Commits message via caveman-commit — user reviews and commits manually. Triggers on any commit intent: "commit", "stage my changes", "ready to push", "let's commit", "make a commit", "commit this", "push changes", "squash and commit", or any variation. Use whenever the user signals they're done with changes and ready to commit, even if they don't mention "message" or "caveman". Does NOT run git commit — outputs a ready-to-run command for the user to execute after review.
Autonomous ML research - agent modifies GPT training code, runs 5-min experiments, keeps improvements
Always use browser-harness for any web interaction: automation, scraping, testing, or site/app work.
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
AI spend analytics — see where your token budget goes by task, model, tool, and project across 31 AI coding tools including Claude Code. Use when the user asks about AI costs, token usage, spend breakdown, or wants to optimize their AI budget.
A standalone adversarial PLAN-review loop where Claude Code (builder) and OpenAI Codex (read-only critic) tag-team an implementation plan before any code is written. Use this when you ALREADY have a plan or a clear idea and just want the cross-model stress-test — no requirements interview first. Claude drafts/loads the plan into PLAN.md, Codex reviews it in a read-only sandbox and returns VERDICT:APPROVED or VERDICT:REVISE, Claude revises and re-submits to the SAME Codex session (context preserved) until APPROVED or a configurable MAX_ROUNDS cap is hit. Human approves the converged plan before code. Use when the user says "/codex-review", "codex review my plan", "have Codex review my plan", "argue this plan with Codex", "adversarial plan review", "make Claude and Codex argue/fight over the plan", or is about to build something high-stakes (auth, schema, concurrency, migrations, payments) and wants a second-model sanity check on the PLAN before implementation. For a guided requirements interview BEFORE the rev
| name | ask-matt |
| description | Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the user-invoked skills in this repo. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
You don't remember every skill, so ask.
A flow is a path through the skills. Most paths run along one main flow, and two on-ramps merge onto it. Everything else is standalone.
The route most work travels. You have an idea and want it built.
/grill-with-docs — sharpen the idea by interview. Start here when you have a codebase: it's stateful, retaining what it learns in CONTEXT.md and ADRs. (No codebase? Use /grill-me — see Standalone.)/handoff in both directions (see Crossing sessions):
/handoff out, then open a fresh session against that file,/prototype to answer the question with throwaway code,/handoff back what you learned, and reference it from the original idea thread./to-prd (turn the thread into a PRD) → /to-issues (split the PRD into independently-grabbable issues). Because the issues are independent, clear context between each one: start a fresh session per issue and kick off /implement by passing it the PRD and the single issue to work on./implement right here, in the same context window.Keep steps 1–3 in one unbroken context window — don't compact or clear until after /to-issues — so the grilling, PRD, and issues all build on the same thinking. Each /implement then starts fresh, working from the issue.
The limit on this is the smart zone: the window (~120k tokens on state-of-the-art models) within which the model still reasons sharply. If a session approaches it before /to-issues, don't push on degraded — /handoff and continue in a fresh thread.
A starting situation that generates work, then merges onto the main flow.
Bugs and requests piling up → /triage. It moves issues through triage roles and produces agent-ready issues, which /implement later picks up.
Triage is only for issues you didn't create — bug reports, incoming feature requests, anything that arrives raw. Issues that /to-issues produced are already agent-ready, so don't triage them.
Not feature work — upkeep.
/improve-codebase-architecture — run whenever you have a spare moment to keep the codebase good for agents to operate in. It surfaces deepening opportunities; picking one generates an idea you can take into the main flow at /grill-with-docs./handoff — when a thread is full or you need to branch off (e.g. into a /prototype session), this compacts the conversation into a markdown file. You don't continue in place — you open a new session and reference that file to carry the context across. It's the bridge between context windows, in either direction. Use it when you want a fresh session but need the current conversation preserved./compact (built-in) — stay in the same conversation, letting the earlier turns be summarized. Use it at intentional breaks between phases, when you don't mind losing the verbatim history. Don't compact mid-phase — the agent can lose its way. /handoff forks; /compact continues.Off the main flow entirely.
/grill-me — the same relentless interview as /grill-with-docs, but for when you have no codebase. Stateless: it saves nothing locally, builds no CONTEXT.md. Reach for it to sharpen any plan or design that doesn't live in a repo./teach — learn a concept over multiple sessions, using the current directory as a stateful workspace./writing-great-skills — reference for writing and editing skills well./setup-matt-pocock-skills — run before your first engineering flow to configure the issue tracker, triage labels, and doc layout the other skills assume. Custom issue trackers also work.