تشغيل أي مهارة في Manus بنقرة واحدة

pmstack-weekly

النجوم٨

التفرعات١

آخر تحديث٥ مايو ٢٠٢٦ في ١٨:١١

A Monday-morning self-snapshot for PMs. Three sections only — decisions made, open loops aging out, and one required "thing I changed my mind about." Anti-vanity by design. Trigger when the user says "weekly memo," "weekly recap," "Monday status," "what changed this week," "weekly self-check," or asks to summarize last week's PM activity. Run weekly on schedule, or on demand to catch up.

التثبيت

التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.

تشغيل في Manus

المصدر

RyanAlberts

RyanAlberts/pmstack

فتح مستودع GitHub عرض مستودعات المنشئ

تنزيل

تشغيل في Manus

المهن ذات الصلةSOC

استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني

متخصصو إدارة المشاريعمهن الأعمال والعمليات المالية·SOC 13-1082

SKILL.md

readonly

name	pmstack-weekly
description	A Monday-morning self-snapshot for PMs. Three sections only — decisions made, open loops aging out, and one required "thing I changed my mind about." Anti-vanity by design. Trigger when the user says "weekly memo," "weekly recap," "Monday status," "what changed this week," "weekly self-check," or asks to summarize last week's PM activity. Run weekly on schedule, or on demand to catch up.

weekly — Monday-morning self-snapshot

A weekly memo that prioritizes what changed in your thinking over what shipped.

Required structure (exactly these three sections)

# weekly — <YYYY-Www>

## Decisions made
<bulleted list, grouped by skill (prd / metrics / eval / brief / competitive / compare / premortem / launch-readiness / lint / eval-drift / other)>
<each line cites the artifact path>

## Open loops aging
- PRD without metrics (>14 days): <path>
- Eval designed but not run (>7 days): <path>
- Brief with broken reference: <path>

## One thing I changed my mind about
<single paragraph; REQUIRED — if user can't name one, the routine writes "none this week" literally>

Hard rules

Three sections only. Do not add a "shipped this week" section — that's vanity.
Open loops cite real file paths, not placeholder text.
"Changed my mind" must contain real content or the literal string "none this week." Silent omission is forbidden — that's what turns this back into a vanity mirror.
Group decisions by skill so the reader sees the shape of the week, not 12 unsorted bullets.

Where to write

With filesystem: outputs/weekly-<YYYY-Www>.md. Read decisions-log.md and glob outputs/* for the 7-day window.
Inline (web/mobile): emit the artifact as markdown with the suggested filename at the top.

Decision-log entry

- <date> — weekly: <N decisions> / <M open loops> — outputs/weekly-<YYYY-Www>.md

Tone

Direct, calibrated, anti-status-report. State confidence levels. The "changed my mind" forcing function is the whole point — it captures learning, not output.

Cold-start behavior

If the last 7 days are empty, write a one-section "no activity yet" memo and prompt the PM to seed by running another skill. If decisions-log.md has at least one entry in the window, the "Decisions made" section is meaningful from week 1.

المزيد من هذا المستودع

نفس المستودع

pmstack-eval-report

RyanAlberts/pmstack

Turns a /run-eval result into a single self-contained, shareable HTML report — a verdict hero (pass/conditional/fail), the per-case table with PASS/FAIL color-coding, and the metrics table — that a PM can paste into Slack, a launch doc, LinkedIn, or a PR. The report carries a "run your own eval" backlink to pmstack. Use when the user says "make this eval shareable," "turn my eval run into a report," "export the eval results," "an HTML report of my eval," "share my eval results," or has a /run-eval output directory and wants a presentable artifact. Renders real run data only (from summary.md) — never invents numbers. Runs bin/eval-report.py on a run directory. Output: report.html next to the run's summary.md.

2026-06-248

pmstack-eval-grade

RyanAlberts/pmstack

Grades an eval the user already has against Anthropic's eval-design principles and returns an Eval Report Card — a letter grade A–F, the failures that earned it with the offending line, the single highest-leverage fix, and a shareable verdict card. It is the inverse of /eval (which writes a suite); this checks whether a suite is any good. Use when the user says "grade my eval," "is my eval any good," "review my eval suite," "roast my eval," "what's wrong with this eval," "did I write this eval right," pastes an eval YAML or rubric and asks for feedback, or wants to check an eval against the Anthropic framework before trusting it. Catches grader leakage, missing negative cases, no target, vibes-as-metric, and uncalibrated LLM-as-judge. Accepts a file path, a pasted/attached eval, or a plain-English success metric. Output: outputs/eval-grade-<feature>-<date>.md.

2026-06-208

pmstack-voc

RyanAlberts/pmstack

Synthesize many raw customer signals (support tickets, interview snippets, churn reasons, sales notes, NPS verbatims, app reviews) into a small set of ranked, PRD-ready problems. Use when a PM pastes or attaches a pile of feedback and asks "what's the real problem / what should we build first / what are the themes", when there are too many signals to read one by one, or when someone needs to turn voice-of-customer data into prioritized problem statements before writing a PRD. This is the front-of-funnel step that precedes pmstack-prd.

2026-05-298

pmstack-onboarding

RyanAlberts/pmstack

An interactive 9-step tutorial that walks a new user through every pmstack capability using a realistic AI-code-review scenario. Includes Anthropic's vibe-test (read raw transcripts before formalizing an eval) and transcript-review (diagnose failed trials as model / grader / task errors) rituals. Works in claude.ai web, desktop, and mobile (no terminal needed). Trigger when the user says "I just installed pmstack," "how do I use this," "tutorial," "walk me through pmstack," "getting started," or "show me what pmstack does."

2026-05-058

pmstack-transcript-review

RyanAlberts/pmstack

Walks a PM through Anthropic's Step 6 ritual — reading transcripts from many trials to diagnose every failed eval task as one of three things — model mistake, grader mistake, or task-spec error. Implements the practice Anthropic describes as "critical" — without it, badly-calibrated graders mask real model improvements. Use when the user has a /run-eval result with failures, asks "why did this fail?", says "let's read the transcripts," wants to debug an eval, suspects grader bugs, or mentions Anthropic's transcript-review practice. Accepts a run folder path, pasted summary + cases, or attached files. Output: a markdown memo at outputs/transcript-review-<feature>-<date>.md with verdict counts and per-trial diagnoses.

2026-05-058

pmstack-vibe-test

RyanAlberts/pmstack

Walks a PM through the layer-1 ritual of reading raw transcripts of an AI feature in action — what Anthropic calls "manual testing, dogfooding, and intuition" — before formalizing a structured eval. Surfaces failure patterns, drafts task candidates (including balanced negative cases per Anthropic Step 3), and produces a verdict on whether the feature is ready for /eval. Use when the user says "I want to vibe-test this," "I have transcripts of our AI feature," "before we write evals let's read the data," "we have support tickets / bug reports about this AI feature," or asks how to start an eval from scratch. Accepts pasted transcripts, attached files, or a folder path. Output: a markdown memo at outputs/vibe-test-<feature>-<date>.md.

2026-05-058

name	pmstack-weekly
description	A Monday-morning self-snapshot for PMs. Three sections only — decisions made, open loops aging out, and one required "thing I changed my mind about." Anti-vanity by design. Trigger when the user says "weekly memo," "weekly recap," "Monday status," "what changed this week," "weekly self-check," or asks to summarize last week's PM activity. Run weekly on schedule, or on demand to catch up.

weekly — Monday-morning self-snapshot

A weekly memo that prioritizes what changed in your thinking over what shipped.

Required structure (exactly these three sections)

# weekly — <YYYY-Www>

## Decisions made
<bulleted list, grouped by skill (prd / metrics / eval / brief / competitive / compare / premortem / launch-readiness / lint / eval-drift / other)>
<each line cites the artifact path>

## Open loops aging
- PRD without metrics (>14 days): <path>
- Eval designed but not run (>7 days): <path>
- Brief with broken reference: <path>

## One thing I changed my mind about
<single paragraph; REQUIRED — if user can't name one, the routine writes "none this week" literally>

Hard rules

Three sections only. Do not add a "shipped this week" section — that's vanity.
Open loops cite real file paths, not placeholder text.
"Changed my mind" must contain real content or the literal string "none this week." Silent omission is forbidden — that's what turns this back into a vanity mirror.
Group decisions by skill so the reader sees the shape of the week, not 12 unsorted bullets.

Where to write

With filesystem: outputs/weekly-<YYYY-Www>.md. Read decisions-log.md and glob outputs/* for the 7-day window.
Inline (web/mobile): emit the artifact as markdown with the suggested filename at the top.

Decision-log entry

- <date> — weekly: <N decisions> / <M open loops> — outputs/weekly-<YYYY-Www>.md

Tone

Direct, calibrated, anti-status-report. State confidence levels. The "changed my mind" forcing function is the whole point — it captures learning, not output.