القائمة
Compare research, specs, plans, and related artifacts to find contradictions, coverage gaps, scope drift, and implementation-readiness risks.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Address pending PR review feedback through verified triage, small fix phases, implementation, validation, and evidence-backed replies. Manual invocation only.
Autonomous iteration loop for a measurable goal: review, ideate, modify, verify, keep or rollback, repeat until interrupted or capped.
Monitor a PR's CircleCI pipeline, diagnose failures, apply scoped fixes, push when requested, and continue until green or blocked.
Stage and commit changes in logical groups using the project's git message style, without mixing unrelated user changes.
Create or update a GitHub PR with concise description, review guidance, triggered specialty reviews, and focus areas.
Build a daily work brief from yesterday/off-hours activity plus today's Linear, Calendar, Gmail, and Notion context; update Notion and produce standup/checklist.
| model | opus |
| name | my-analyze |
| description | Compare research, specs, plans, and related artifacts to find contradictions, coverage gaps, scope drift, and implementation-readiness risks. |
Audit consistency across artifacts before implementation. This is not a code review; it checks whether the written plan still matches the research, spec, decisions, and constraints.
Read:
~/.claude/rules/question-policy.md~/.claude/rules/context-checkpoint.mdUse ~/.agents/rules/ when running through Codex. For complex multi-artifact comparisons or workflow-stage runs, read references/protocol-index.md.
$ARGUMENTS, workflow ledger, or recent research/spec/plan directories.my-clarify.Return consistency findings with artifact references, why each matters, recommended fix, and whether implementation should proceed.