القائمة
Workforce coding conventions — read existing patterns, prefer narrow types, leave the surface area smaller than you found it.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
| name | coding-conventions |
| description | Workforce coding conventions — read existing patterns, prefer narrow types, leave the surface area smaller than you found it. |
| tags | ["engineering","coding","style"] |
Generic guardrails for any agent that writes or modifies code. Load this skill when you're about to touch a codebase you don't fully own.
Read the file you're about to modify. Read its callers. Read the test that covers it. The shape that already exists is the shape — match it. Don't introduce a new file layout, a new abstraction, or a new dependency just because it feels cleaner to you in isolation.
The diff should answer the request and nothing else. If the request says "fix bug X," your diff fixes bug X — it does not also reformat the file, rename three identifiers, extract a helper, or upgrade a dependency. Each of those is a separate decision the user has not made yet.
Three similar lines beats a premature abstraction. Wait for the fourth before factoring.
Default: don't write one. Names and types do the explaining. Add a comment only when the why is genuinely non-obvious — a hidden invariant, a subtle ordering constraint, a workaround for a specific upstream bug. Keep it one line. Don't explain what the code does; the reader can see that.
Never write multi-paragraph docstrings. Never reference the current ticket or the caller list — both rot.
Prefer narrow types over any / unknown / wide unions. Make illegal states unrepresentable when it's cheap.
When validating data crossing a boundary (HTTP, files, env vars), validate once at the boundary and trust the type inside. Don't re-validate in every internal function.
Throw Error with a clear, specific message. Don't swallow. Don't wrap in try/catch just to log-and-rethrow.
Don't add error handling for cases that can't happen. Trust internal invariants; only validate at boundaries.
Don't add a dependency for something you can write in 20 lines. Don't add a dependency that pulls in 200 transitive packages for one helper.
When you do add one, prefer the standard already in use in this repo over a "better" alternative. Consistency beats individual optimization.
When the requirement is ambiguous, ask. Don't infer the user's intent from one example and ship the inferred behavior. A two-sentence question saves a re-do.
A bug fix gets a test that would have caught the bug. A new feature gets at least one happy-path test. If a function has no tests today and you're adding new behavior, add the test for the new behavior — don't backfill the existing surface.
Tests live next to their code (the test/ dir in this package, or alongside the file in others — match the local convention).
