بنقرة واحدة
review-changes
Review all uncommitted changes in the current repo and produce a structured code review report.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Review all uncommitted changes in the current repo and produce a structured code review report.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
蚂蚁银行开户
香港卡办理
A brief description of what this skill does
A brief description of what this skill does
look up and explain llm api pricing across models.dev, openrouter, and official provider pages. use when the user asks for model prices, input/output token costs, cached-token costs, openrouter aliases such as :free, provider-specific pricing, official versus third-party prices, or wants to verify an api call cost log.
Analyze Claude Code features and capabilities to uncover advanced usage patterns, best practices, and real-world application scenarios. Use this skill whenever the user mentions a Claude Code feature (like Streaming Tool Execution, Hooks, MCP, Skills, Subagents, Context Management, Permission Modes, etc.) and wants to know how to leverage it effectively — including advanced tips, workflow optimizations, creative use cases, and pitfalls to avoid. Also trigger when the user pastes a feature description or asks 'how to use X better in Claude Code', even without explicitly saying 'analyze'.
| name | review-changes |
| description | Review all uncommitted changes in the current repo and produce a structured code review report. |
| whenToUse | When the user asks to review their changes, check their code, or wants feedback before committing. |
| context | fork |
| allowedTools | ["Bash","Read","Grep"] |
Review all uncommitted changes in the current Git repository and produce a structured code review report.
git diff --stat to get an overview of changed filesgit diff to get the full diff contentReturn a markdown report with this structure:
One paragraph overview: how many files changed, what the changes do at a high level, overall assessment (looks good / needs attention / has issues).
For each file with findings:
A final one-line recommendation: "Ready to commit", "Consider addressing N issues first", or "Needs revision".