بنقرة واحدة
adv-comp-research
Competitive intelligence research methodology for source code and public information comparison
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Competitive intelligence research methodology for source code and public information comparison
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Architecture inconsistency detection via deterministic tools, research fallback, and AI heuristic
AI-generated code quality detection via AST, regex, and heuristic analysis
Backend technology stack evaluation — choose boring technology scaled by project context. Use when selecting languages, databases, async infra, or API styles for new or existing backends.
Improvement-discovery methodology for current-state, LBP, and external landscape analysis
Backlog reconciliation, bug priority assignment, and ROADMAP.md regeneration methodology
Codebase reconnaissance skill for mapping structure, hotspots, and risks
| name | adv-comp-research |
| description | Competitive intelligence research methodology for source code and public information comparison |
| keywords | ["competitive","comparison","market","pricing","features","intelligence","research"] |
| metadata | {"priority":"medium","source":"agent-created"} |
Reusable competitive intelligence methodology for ADV comp-scan workflows. Provides two-mode research strategy, auto-mode detection, comparison table format, and evidence requirements.
When the competitor is a GitHub repository (URL matches github.com/*):
When the competitor is a website, product page, or documentation:
| URL Pattern | Mode | Override |
|---|---|---|
github.com/* | source | --mode source |
| Everything else | public | --mode public |
User can force mode via --mode source|public. When ambiguous, default to public mode.
| Feature | This Project | Competitor | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| {feature} | {our_status} | {their_status} | {observation} |
{
"category": "feature|pricing|performance|security|ux",
"our_status": "present|missing|partial|unknown",
"their_status": "present|missing|partial|unknown",
"delta": "parity|advantage|gap|unknown",
"source": "https://..."
}
source fieldconfidence: low when source is secondary