بنقرة واحدة
ultraqa
Adversarial dynamic E2E QA workflow with scenario matrix, fix/retest loop, and Omagy state tracking for agy.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Adversarial dynamic E2E QA workflow with scenario matrix, fix/retest loop, and Omagy state tracking for agy.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
[OMAGY] Run an anti-slop cleanup/refactor/deslop workflow
Run read-only deep repository analysis with ranked synthesis, concrete evidence, and explicit Evidence/Inference/Unknown boundaries.
Full OMX-style autonomous pipeline for Omagy: interview, plan, goal execution, optional team, review, and UltraQA.
Professor-critic research workflow with durable Omagy artifacts for agy.
Stateful validator-gated research loop with artifact-gated completion.
[Omagy] Bounded best-practice research wrapper using official/upstream evidence first
| name | ultraqa |
| description | Adversarial dynamic E2E QA workflow with scenario matrix, fix/retest loop, and Omagy state tracking for agy. |
Use /omagy:ultraqa when the user asks for adversarial QA, hostile E2E
testing, regression hardening, interactive CLI/service QA, or "test it beyond
normal unit tests".
UltraQA is not satisfied by a shallow build/lint/typecheck/test checklist. It must exercise the requested behavior through adversarial dynamic E2E scenarios whenever the target can be run, simulated, or harnessed safely.
omagy ultraqa start --goal "<goal>" --json..omagy/state/ultraqa-state.json.omagy ultraqa record-scenario --input '<json>' --json to persist each
scenario row.omagy ultraqa complete --input '<json>' --json.omagy cancel --mode ultraqa --json for cancellation.Before declaring success, create and maintain a scenario matrix. Each row must include scenario id, intent, user/attacker model, setup, command or harness, expected signal, actual result, fixes applied, evidence, and cleanup status.
Include normal-path coverage plus these hostile and edge-case classes unless clearly irrelevant or blocked by safety:
.omagy/state files, mismatched sessions, missing
timestamps, contradictory phase metadata.Run up to 5 cycles:
Use these phase names:
planningbaselineadversarial-e2ediagnosefixcleanupcompleteExamples:
omagy ultraqa start --goal "Verify CLI rejects misleading success output" --json
omagy ultraqa record-scenario --input '{"id":"ADV-E2E-001","intent":"malformed input","user_model":"hostile CLI user","scenario":"invalid JSON","command":"omagy state write --input not-json","expected_signal":"non-zero exit","actual_result":"failed as expected","status":"pass","evidence":["exit 1"],"cleanup":"none"}' --json
omagy ultraqa complete --input '{"qa_verdict":{"clean":true,"skipped":false,"summary":"baseline and adversarial scenarios passed"},"scenario_matrix_path":".omagy/reports/ultraqa-report.md","verification_evidence":["npm test passed","ADV-E2E-001 passed"],"cleanup":{"status":"clean"}}' --json
UltraQA completion requires:
qa_verdict.clean:true or qa_verdict.skipped:truescenario_matrix or scenario_matrix_path unless skippedverification_evidence or equivalent evidence unless skippedcleanup.status:"clean", cleanup.ok:true, or cleanup_status:"clean"
unless skippedIf the QA gate fails, keep the workflow active and return findings to the
implementation owner. In a future /omagy:autopilot, failed UltraQA should
return to planning/execution; until then, report the failing scenarios and the
next owner explicitly.
Every terminal result must include:
Do not run destructive cleanup, exfiltrate secrets, write to production, spawn unbounded processes, wait indefinitely, or hide unrelated dirty work. If a scenario would violate these bounds, mark it blocked and use a safe substitute.