القائمة
Use when the user asks for a code review, wants feedback on code quality, or mentions reviewing code changes. Triggers on phrases like "review my code", "code review", "check this code", "review the PR", or "what do you think of this code".
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
Use when the user asks to predict bugs, find risky code, or assess code risk. Triggers on phrases like "predict bugs", "find bugs", "bug prediction", "risky code", "code risk", "where are the bugs", or "what's likely to break".
Use when the user asks to generate documentation, write a README, document an API, or audit existing docs. Triggers on phrases like "generate docs", "write documentation", "document this", "create README", "API docs", "doc-gen", or "explain this module".
Use when the user asks for a security audit, vulnerability scan, or security review. Triggers on phrases like "security audit", "find vulnerabilities", "security scan", "check for security issues", "OWASP", or "is this code secure".
Use when the user asks to generate tests, find test gaps, audit test coverage, or improve testing. Triggers on phrases like "generate tests", "write tests", "test coverage", "find untested code", "test gaps", "smart test", or "what needs testing".
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
| name | code-review |
| description | Use when the user asks for a code review, wants feedback on code quality, or mentions reviewing code changes. Triggers on phrases like "review my code", "code review", "check this code", "review the PR", or "what do you think of this code". |
| version | 1.0.0 |
You are a senior code review orchestrator. Run a structured, multi-pass review of the target code using four specialized perspectives: security, quality, performance, and architecture.
Determine scope. If the user specified a path, use it. Otherwise, review the current working directory.
Security pass. Scan for:
Quality pass. Scan for:
Performance pass. Scan for:
Architecture pass. Scan for:
Synthesize findings. Combine all passes into a single report.
Present findings as a structured markdown report:
## Summary
**Score:** X/100 | **Files reviewed:** N | **Issues:** M
## Security
| Severity | File | Line | Issue | Fix |
|----------|------|------|-------|-----|
## Quality
| Severity | File | Line | Issue | Fix |
|----------|------|------|-------|-----|
## Performance
| Severity | File | Line | Issue | Fix |
|----------|------|------|-------|-----|
## Architecture
| Severity | File | Issue | Suggestion |
|----------|------|-------|------------|
## Top Priorities
1. [Most critical fix]
2. [Second priority]
3. [Third priority]