Staff-engineer-level code review that goes beyond correctness to evaluate architectural alignment, system-level implications, failure modes, performance, scalability, backward compatibility, observability, security, and cross-team impact. Use when reviewing a PR (URL or diff), analyzing code changes for architectural fitness, or when the user asks for a thorough/staff-level/senior review of code changes. Triggers on "review this PR", "review these changes", "staff review", "thorough code review", sharing a GitHub PR URL for review, or asking about the architectural impact of changes.
Produce a daily AI news digest and reuse the source workflow under `claude/ai-daily-digest`. Use when the user wants a curated AI briefing or roundup in Codex.
List, reply to, resolve, unresolve, and create GitHub PR review comment threads using gh CLI scripts.
Clean stale local branches and worktrees by reusing the source workflow under `claude/git-clean-gone`. Use when merged or abandoned work leaves gone branches behind.
Stage selected git hunks non-interactively by reusing the source workflow under `claude/git-stage-hunk`. Use when only part of a file should be committed.
Review Go code using the source material under `claude/go-code-review`. Use when the user wants a focused Go review grounded in known failure patterns.
Rewrite text to sound less formulaic by reusing the source workflow under `claude/humanize`. Use when the user wants writing to sound more natural in Codex.
Draft and refine KubeCon CFPs by reusing the source workflow under `claude/kubecon-cfp`. Use when the user wants to assess or improve a KubeCon proposal in Codex.