القائمة
Record one atomic friction into the learning inbox (via MCP) — the gap between what is and what could be. Use when something caused friction, confusion, a blocker, or an improvement opportunity appeared.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Edit a content draft — structure, voice, tightness.
Record one atomic friction — the gap between what is and what could be — into the learning inbox (via the inbox MCP friction tool).
Record the session — progress, problems, insights and context gaps — into the learning inbox (via the inbox MCP journal tool).
The local governance pass — list and clear the pending frictions within your reach (via the inbox MCP pending/resolve/rescope tools). Invoked by the human; never run spontaneously.
Route a request to the right purpose/persona of this workspace.
Draft a content piece in acme's voice from a brief.
| name | friction |
| description | Record one atomic friction into the learning inbox (via MCP) — the gap between what is and what could be. Use when something caused friction, confusion, a blocker, or an improvement opportunity appeared. |
| argument-hint | optional hint about the friction |
Record a friction — the gap between what is and what could be — atomically,
in the moment, with the context fresh. The skill is the method (capture it
well-formed); the record goes to the inbox table in Surreal via the friction
tool of the inbox MCP (append-only, user stamped server-side, drained only by
governance). Never write to disk.
Frictions are the fuel of governance.
Identify the friction in the recent interaction: what ground, confused,
blocked, or what improvement opportunity appeared. If the human gave a hint
($ARGUMENTS), use it as direction; otherwise take the most relevant recent one.
Assemble the record as structured markdown, in the shape of
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/format.md. Be rich and specific in the record (not in
the reply).
Scope it — whose problem is this? The criterion is the MOUNTS: who has the context and access to actually fix it?
scope = your purpose.scope = that
ancestor. Escalation happens HERE, at creation — pick the ancestor now.scope (the root governance queue).Write to the inbox: call the friction tool (of the inbox MCP server)
with the markdown as the text argument, origin = who you are right now
(the purpose/agent acting — a subagent names itself, not the shell that dispatched
it) and the scope from step 3. Each friction is a separate append.
Confirm in one sentence. E.g. "Friction recorded (scope: delivery): X and Y terms are easily confused." No essay, no follow-up.