| name | citation-verification |
| description | The rules for grounding every claim about a matter document in a verified citation — anchoring quotes with the cite tool, handling failed verification, and sourcing case law only from the case-law tool. Use whenever quoting, citing, summarizing, or making factual claims about a matter's documents or about legal authority. |
A lawyer must never be handed a quote whose text does not exist in the
document, or a case that does not exist in the reporter. Every factual claim
about a matter document is anchored before it is presented; every case-law
claim comes from a live lookup. Memory is not a source.
- **Anchor every quotation.** Before any passage from a matter document goes
into an answer, call `cite` with it. All four required args matter:
`docPath` (the absolute path exactly as search-document or read-document
returned it — never a guessed or reconstructed path), `documentName` (the
human-readable name), `quote`, and `reason` (why the passage supports the
claim), plus an honest integer `confidence` 1-5.
- **Quotes are verbatim, 10-600 characters.** Copy the text exactly as the
document returned it: no paraphrase, no added or removed ellipses, no
normalized punctuation or "cleaned up" spacing. Under 10 characters the tool
rejects the call — extend the quote with its surrounding sentence. Over 600,
split it into consecutive quotes or quote the operative sentence and put the
surroundings in the optional `context` arg.
- **Claims without a quote are claims without support.** A statement like "the
agreement has no cap on liability" must rest on cited text (the clause that
governs liability, quoted) or be presented as unverified. Do not present a
conclusion about a document's contents with no anchored passage behind it.
Every citation any tool returns — search-document hits and cite anchors alike —
is re-checked against the live file before you see it, on a three-step ladder:
- exact — the stored span still reproduces the excerpt verbatim: verified.
- re-anchor — the excerpt moved (the document was edited after indexing)
but still appears; the span is repaired and marked re-anchored: verified,
but the search index is stale.
- reject — the excerpt is nowhere in the live document: the citation is
dropped.
When a result reports re-anchored or rejected citations, relay the
recommendation to re-upload (re-ingest) the named document — search stays
inaccurate until then. Never quote or rely on a rejected passage.
When `cite` cannot verify a quote, the quote is wrong — the tool re-extracted
the live document and the text is not in it.
- Re-read, then re-quote. Go back to
read-document or search-document,
find the passage, and copy the verified text verbatim into a new cite call.
- Never paraphrase-and-retry. Reworking the failed quote from memory —
shuffling words, trimming clauses, "fixing" it until something passes — is
manufacturing a fabricated quotation. The only acceptable retry is text
freshly copied from a tool result.
- If the passage genuinely is not in the document, say so. "I could not
verify this in [document]" is a correct answer; an unanchored quotation
never is.
- Case names, reporter citations, holdings, and quotations from opinions come
ONLY from the `case-law` tool's results (or a connected CourtListener
source), never from memory — a remembered case is presumptively fabricated.
Cite only cases the tool returned, with the citation and URL it returned.
- The corpus is U.S. opinions only. On a non-U.S. matter, do not present its
results as binding authority — flag them as U.S. precedent and route
jurisdiction-specific authority questions to the supervising lawyer.
- When the tool returns nothing or is unreachable, report that. Never fill the
gap with an invented or recalled citation.
- Auditing the citations in a finished brief or memo is its own procedure: the
cite-check skill.
