Critically interview the user about a plan or design until every design-significant branch reaches shared understanding. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan, clarify an uncertain idea, compare real alternatives, expose edge cases, or be grilled before implementation.
Extend a design criticizing session with repository-aware documentation discovery, terminology checks, decision status, and controlled documentation updates. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan against existing code and documented intent, create a private working draft, or keep canonical design documentation aligned as decisions are accepted.
Run four independent PR reviews (/review-pr, /review, /code-review, /audit-tests) in parallel and merge them into one deduplicated, severity-tiered report. Use for a thorough multi-lens review before merging a non-trivial PR.
Review a ProbPipe PR for documentation, tests, API consistency, philosophy adherence, and code quality. Use when asked to review a PR or check for issues.
Audit the ProbPipe test suite for gaps, stale tests, duplicates, style issues, weak assertions, and mathematical correctness.