تشغيل أي مهارة في Manus بنقرة واحدة

ابدأ الآن

rulesgen-validation-debugging

النجوم٠

التفرعات٠

آخر تحديث٢٨ مايو ٢٠٢٦ في ٠٩:٠٥

Use for Pydantic v2 validation errors, DSL parser/validator rejections, and API request validation issues in Rulesgen.

التثبيت

التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.

تشغيل في Manus

المصدر

tdspora

tdspora/tdm_rulesgen

فتح مستودع GitHub عرض مستودعات المنشئ

تنزيل

تشغيل في Manus

المهن ذات الصلةSOC

استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني

مطوّرو البرمجياتمهن الحاسوب والرياضيات·SOC 15-1252

SKILL.md

readonly

name	rulesgen-validation-debugging
description	Use for Pydantic v2 validation errors, DSL parser/validator rejections, and API request validation issues in Rulesgen.

Rulesgen Validation Debugging

Workflow

Capture the exact failing input (request body, DSL text, or library call) and the full error message.
Classify the failure:
- Pydantic schema — ValidationError raised in rulesgen/schemas/* or rulesgen/domain/models.py. Locate the offending field via the error loc tuple.
- DSL parser — failure in rulesgen/compiler/parser.py. Reproduce with a minimal DSL snippet and a unit test in tests/unit/test_compiler.py.
- DSL validator — AST rejected by rulesgen/compiler/validator.py. Check whether the rejection is expected for safety; if so, document why; if not, narrow the validator rule.
- Runtime properties — type or shape mismatch in RuntimeSpec. Check rulesgen/compiler/runtime_spec.py and tests/unit/test_runtime_properties.py.
- API request validation — FastAPI rejected the request before the route. Look at the route signature, the dependency in rulesgen/api/dependencies.py, and the schema in rulesgen/schemas/.
Confirm the contract:
- For schema changes: are positive and negative tests present?
- For DSL changes: does requirements/NL-to-Python-Generation-DSL.md describe this form?
- For API changes: does the error surface as RFC 7807 Problem Details (tests/contract/)?
Write or update a failing test that reproduces the bug before changing production code.
Fix in the smallest scope: schema field, validator branch, or parser rule.
Confirm by running uv run pytest <targeted> and the existing tests in the same file (no regressions).
Verify error response shape for API paths via tests/contract/test_problem_details.py patterns.

Common pitfalls

Loosening the AST validator to accept user input is a security issue — escalate to rulesgen-security-reviewer.
Pydantic v2 default factories vs default= semantics differ from v1; verify against the v2 docs (use the context7 MCP if needed).
from __future__ import annotations + Pydantic v2 requires explicit model_rebuild() in some forward-reference cases.

المزيد من هذا المستودع

نفس المستودع

rulesgen-docs-publish

tdspora/tdm_rulesgen

Use when adding, renaming, reordering, or linking Rulesgen public docs that flow to the tdm-docs Docusaurus site and tdspora.ai. Covers the import pipeline, sidebar/.order mechanics, the "link locally until published" rule, and the lychee link-check and docs-contract validation battery.

2026-07-020

rulesgen-docs-authoring

tdspora/tdm_rulesgen

Use for authoring or updating Rulesgen documentation — public docs (`docs/public/`), repo-root design docs, contributor docs, sample READMEs, and the glossary. Produces testable, glossary-aligned, link-integral docs.

2026-05-280

rulesgen-docs-testing

tdspora/tdm_rulesgen

Use for testing Rulesgen documentation — executes Markdown code fences via Sybil, validates link integrity, lints glossary usage, and cross-checks docs against Settings, schemas, and routes.

2026-05-280

rulesgen-dsl-authoring

tdspora/tdm_rulesgen

Use for authoring, reviewing, or correcting natural-language → Python generation DSL rules for Rulesgen.

2026-05-280

rulesgen-implement-feature

tdspora/tdm_rulesgen

Use for implementing production-grade Rulesgen features or non-trivial code changes.

2026-05-280

rulesgen-api-debugging

tdspora/tdm_rulesgen

Use for FastAPI route, middleware, lifespan, dependency injection, or Problem Details response issues in Rulesgen.

2026-05-270

Rulesgen Validation Debugging

Workflow

Capture the exact failing input (request body, DSL text, or library call) and the full error message.

Classify the failure:

Pydantic schema — ValidationError raised in rulesgen/schemas/* or rulesgen/domain/models.py. Locate the offending field via the error loc tuple.
DSL parser — failure in rulesgen/compiler/parser.py. Reproduce with a minimal DSL snippet and a unit test in tests/unit/test_compiler.py.
DSL validator — AST rejected by rulesgen/compiler/validator.py. Check whether the rejection is expected for safety; if so, document why; if not, narrow the validator rule.
Runtime properties — type or shape mismatch in RuntimeSpec. Check rulesgen/compiler/runtime_spec.py and tests/unit/test_runtime_properties.py.
API request validation — FastAPI rejected the request before the route. Look at the route signature, the dependency in rulesgen/api/dependencies.py, and the schema in rulesgen/schemas/.

Confirm the contract:

For schema changes: are positive and negative tests present?
For DSL changes: does requirements/NL-to-Python-Generation-DSL.md describe this form?
For API changes: does the error surface as RFC 7807 Problem Details (tests/contract/)?

Write or update a failing test that reproduces the bug before changing production code.

Fix in the smallest scope: schema field, validator branch, or parser rule.

Confirm by running uv run pytest <targeted> and the existing tests in the same file (no regressions).

Verify error response shape for API paths via tests/contract/test_problem_details.py patterns.

Common pitfalls

Loosening the AST validator to accept user input is a security issue — escalate to rulesgen-security-reviewer.

Pydantic v2 default factories vs default= semantics differ from v1; verify against the v2 docs (use the context7 MCP if needed).

from __future__ import annotations + Pydantic v2 requires explicit model_rebuild() in some forward-reference cases.